Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 05-12-2021

Case Style:

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. LACEY LYNN JOHNS, Defendant.

Case Number: CF-2020-196

Judge: McCurdy, Jack

Court: In the District Court in and for Canadian County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Canadian County District Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:


El Reno Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory


Description: El Reno, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, charged with:
Count # 1. Count as Filed: COMPU, COMPUTER FRAUD / UNLAWFUL USE OF COMPUTER / SYSTEM, in violation of 21 O.S. 1953(A)(2)
Date of Offense: 12/05/2019
Party Name Disposition Information
JOHNS, LACEY LYNN Disposed: DEFERRED, 05/12/2021. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: COMPUTER FRAUD / UNLAWFUL USE OF COMPUTER / SYSTEM(COMPU)
Violation of 21 O.S. 1953(A)(2)
Count # 2. Count as Filed: OWN, FALSE DECLARATION OF OWNERSHIP IN PAWN, in violation of 59 O.S. 1512
Date of Offense: 12/23/2019
Party Name Disposition Information
JOHNS, LACEY LYNN Disposed: DEFERRED, 05/12/2021. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: FALSE DECLARATION OF OWNERSHIP IN PAWN(OWN)
Violation of 59 O.S. 1512

Outcome: 05-12-2021 CTFREE

CRT MIN. STATE WAS REPRESENTED BYAUSTIN MURREY. DEFT APPEARED IN PERSON WITH ATTORNEY, CRAIG CORGAN. A COMPLETED PLEA OF GUILTY SUMMARY OF FACTS FORM WAS SUBMITTED TO THE COURT. DEFT WAS SWORN AND TESTIMONY RECEIVED. DEFT WAS ADVISED OF HER RIGHTS AND ENTERED A PLEA OF GUILTY TO BOTH COUNTS. PURSUANT TO A PLEA AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE AND DEFT, SENTENCING WAS DEFERRED FOR FOUR YEARS ON EACH COUNT. DEFT WAS ORDERED TO BE SUPERVISED BY THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND COMPLY WITH THE RULES AND CONDITIONS OF PROBATION INCLUDING PAYMENT OF RESTITUTION. THE COURT APPROVED THE SUMMARY OF RESTITUTION PAYMENTS FORM. THE STATE ADVISED THE COURT THAT THE PLEA AGREEMENT WAS FAIR TO THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. DEFT WAS ORDERED TO PAY A FINE, VCA AND COSTS IN BOTH COUNTS. DEFT WAS ADVISED OF HER APPEAL RIGHTS. A RULE 8 ORDER WAS EXECUTED. JUDGE STRUBHAR

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: