Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 06-15-2022
Case Style:
Case Number: CF-2021-304
Judge: McCurdy, Jack
Court: In the District Court in and for Canadian County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff's Attorney: Canadian County District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Description: El Reno, OK: criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with:
Count # 1. Count as Filed: MR9, UNLAWFUL USE OR DISPLAY OF LICENSE OR IDENTIFICATION CARD, in violation of 47 O.S. 6-301(2)(e)
Date of Offense: 02/22/2021
Party Name Disposition Information
SHAOWEI, NI Disposed: DISMISSED, 06/15/2022. Dismissed by Court
Count as Disposed: UNLAWFUL USE OR DISPLAY OF LICENSE OR IDENTIFICATION CARD(MR9)
Violation of 47 O.S. 6-301(2)(e)
Count # 2. Count as Filed: DU4, UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402
Date of Offense: 02/22/2021
Party Name Disposition Information
SHAOWEI, NI Disposed: CONVICTION, 06/15/2022. Nolo Contendere Plea
Count as Disposed: UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE(DU4)
Violation of 63 O.S. 2-402
Outcome: 5-2022 CTFREE
CRT MIN. STATE WAS REPRESENTED BY AUSTIN MURREY. DEFT APPEARED IN PERSON WITH ATTORNEY, ALISON ROBERTS. THE INTERPRETER, TOM NI, WAS ALSO PRESENT AND GIVEN THE INTERPRETERS OATH. THE DEFT WAS SWORN AND GIVEN THE INTERPRETER'S LANGUAGE. THE PROCEEDING WAS RECORDED. THE COURT WAS ADVISED THE DEFTS LAST NAME IS "NI". A COMPLETED PLEA OF NO CONTEST SUMMARY OF FACTS FORM WAS SUBMITTED TO THE COURT. DEFT WAS SWORN AND TESTIMONY RECEIVED. DEFT WAS ADVISED OF HIS RIGHTS. THE STATE MOVED TO DISMISS COUNT #1 WITHOUT COSTS. THE DEFT ENTERED A PLEA OF NO CONTEST TO COUNT TWO. PURSUANT TO A PLEA AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE AND DEFT, DEFT WAS SENTENCED TO A ONE YEAR SUSPENDED SENTENCE. DEFT WAS ORDERED TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES AND CONDITIONS OF PROBATION. DEFT WAS ORDERED TO PAY A $500.00 FINE, $200.00 VCA AND COSTS IN COUNT #2. THE STATE ADVISED THE COURT THE PLEA AGREEMENT WAS FAIR TO THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. THE DEFT WAS ADVISED OF HIS APPEAL RIGHTS. A RULE 8 ORDER WAS EXECUTED. JUDGE STRUBHAR
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: