Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 03-26-2024

Case Style:

State of Oklahoma v. Cecil Langstan

Case Number: CF-2022-582

Judge: Paul Hesse

Court: In the District Court in and for Canadian County, Oklahoma.

Plaintiff's Attorney: Canadian County District Attorney's Office

Defendant's Attorney: Garet Lee Holland

Description: El Reno, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: DU8TAM3, AGGRAVATED TRAFFICKING IN ILLEGAL DRUGS (METHAMPHETAMINE), in violation of 63 O.S. 2-415(C)
Date of Offense: 10/06/2022
LANGSTON, CECIL
Disposed: CONVICTION, 03/26/2024. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: AGGRAVATED TRAFFICKING IN ILLEGAL DRUGS (METHAMPHETAMINE)(DU8TAM3)
Violation of 63 O.S. 2-415(C)
Count # 2.
Count as Filed: DU8M, UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-401(B)(2)
Date of Offense: 10/06/2022
LANGSTON, CECIL
Disposed: CONVICTION, 03/26/2024. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE(DU8M)
Violation of 63 O.S. 2-401(B)(2)

Outcome: CRT MIN. DET APPEARS IN PERSON ALONG WITH HIS ATTY GARET HOLLAND. THE STATE APPEARS THRU AUSTIN MURREY. THE COURT REPORTER IS BRI EVANS. THE DEFT WAS SWORN TESTIMONY WAS TAKEN. THE DEFT TESTIFIED THAT HE UNDERSTOOD THE QUESTIONS ON THE SUMMARY OF FACTS AND THAT HIS ANSWERS WERE TRUTHFUL AND HONEST. THE DEFT FURTHER TESTIFIED THAT HE UNDERSOOD HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND THAT BY ENTERING A PLEA HE WOULD BE GIVING UP THOSE RIGHTS. THE PLEA AGREEMENT ON COUNT 1 IS A 20 YEAR SENTENCE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ALL SUSPENDED EXCEPT FOR THE FIRST 10 YEARS. $50,000.00 FINE ALL SUSPENDED EXCEPT FOR THE FIRST $10,000.00, A $200.00 VCA, SUPERVISED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. COUNT 2 IS A 7 YEARS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. $200.00 FINE, $200.00 VCA. BOTH COUNTS TO RUN CONCURRENT TO EACH OTHER. DEFT UNDERSTOOD THE PLEA AND PLED GUILTY TO BOTH COUNTS. THE COURT ACCEPTS THAT PLEA. THE DEFT NEEDED NO FURTHER EXPLANATION OF HIS RIGHTS TO APPEAL. THE COURT EXECUTES THE SUMMARY OF FACTS ALONG WITH THE ORDER OF COMMITMENT, THE RULE 8 HEARING AND THE RULES AND CONDITIONS OF DOC SUPERVISION. JUDGE HALLEY

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: