Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 08-25-2022

Case Style:

State of Florida v. Tony Garcia

Case Number: SC19-1870

Judge: Couriel

Court: Supreme Court of Florida on appeals from the Fourth District Court on appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County

Plaintiff's Attorney: Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III, Assistant Attorney General

Defendant's Attorney:



Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best West Palm Beach Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory


If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free.


Description: West Palm Beach, Florida criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with arson.

On June 11, 2014, Tony Garcia’s mortgage lender sent him
notice that, in a month, his home would be sold at foreclosure.

Seventeen days later, Garcia’s neighbor saw the house go up in
flames and called 911. The State charged Garcia with arson for
setting fire to the place. Garcia’s first trial ended in a hung jury,
and, with his second trial pending, a judge released him on bond.
As the evidence later heard by the sentencing judge would
establish, Garcia made a menace of himself while out on bond. On
one occasion, while driving with a suspended license, he left the
scene of a car crash and was arrested. Another day, shaking and
crying as he did, Garcia aimed a gun in the face of a neighbor who
had stopped by Garcia’s house to pick up some tools and have a
beer; the neighbor did not call the police. Just two days after that
episode, the police were summoned to Garcia’s ex-wife’s house,
where Garcia had gone to retrieve guns from a safe. They found
him banging on her door, acting in a manner that to them
suggested intoxication, mental disturbance, or both. Garcia
denounced an officer on the scene with a racial epithet; the officer
deescalated the situation and gave Garcia a ride home.

No sooner had Garcia gotten out of the officer’s car than he
struck up an argument with his neighbor, threatening to shoot him
and the officer who had driven him home. The officer, at that point
having heard enough, took Garcia to a mental health facility and
sought to have him involuntarily examined under the Baker Act.2
Not an hour later, Garcia had walked out of the facility and was on
the street again. Another officer, having received a tip about
Garcia’s whereabouts, found him eating chicken wings and drinking
beer at a local bar and returned him to the mental health facility.
Learning all this, the trial court expressed its concern for the
safety of Garcia and of the community and revoked Garcia’s bond.
He would await retrial on his arson charge in jail. While there, as
the trial court would later learn, his threatening conduct continued.
On a call with his ex-wife, Garcia said that he would break his
daughter-in-law’s neck if he ever saw her again. On another call,
he told his ex-wife that he wanted to summon a gang to his
daughter-in-law’s house but was hesitant to do so knowing they
would also “take out” his grandson.

Garcia proceeded to his second trial and was convicted of first-
degree arson.3 The judge ordered a presentence investigation
report. The report showed that Garcia had a 12th-grade education;
that he was unemployed due to disability; that he had a criminal
history (one conviction for battery and one for the time he drove on
a suspended license while out on bond); and that his minimum and
maximum permissible sentences were 34.8 months and 360
months, respectively. The report concluded that Garcia failed to
cooperate with the court and the law, and that despite suffering
from stomach cancer and being confined to a wheelchair, he was a
threat to himself and society.

Garcia moved for a downward departure from the lowest
permissible sentence as calculated under the Criminal Punishment
Code; he wanted a sentence of probation. He argued that he was
severely ill with terminal cancer and required significant medical
attention to maintain his current state of health. The State, for its
part, recommended a sentence of 84 months. In its sentencing
submission, it laid out Garcia’s conduct while out on bond,
including his threats to witnesses, argued that the defendant’s
conduct had callously endangered the lives of neighbors and first
responders, and argued Garcia had proffered no evidence that he
required specialized medical treatment.

Outcome: Because we do not find fundamental error in Garcia’s
unpreserved claim, we quash the decision of the Fourth District to
the extent it requires that the Respondent be resentenced.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: