Lincoln, Nebraska personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the District Court of Dawson County, CI 23-00145, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Premises liability law is summarized by the idea that a landowner has a legal obligation to protect visitors invited onto their land from

Omaha, Nebraska personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

In Nebraska, the right to compensation is based on the “51% rule.” A plaintiff can still recover partial compensation so long as their degree of fault is less than that of the defendant(s) in the case. The plaintiff's compensation will be reduced in proportion to their percentage o

Pierre, South Dakota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Pierre, South Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

In South Dakota, car accident liability is primarily determined based on fault. This means that the party responsible for causing the accident is typically held liable for the resulting damages. This is because South Dakota follows a modified comparative negligence rule.

Rapid City, South Dakota insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

"South Dakota recognizes insurance bad faith. As explained by the Supreme Court of South Dakota, “[a] cause of action against an insurance company for bad faith failure to pay a claim is recognized in South Dakota.” Stene v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. C

Fargo, North Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

North Dakota is a modified comparative negligence state It allocates fault to all parties involved, thus reducing how much each party can recover from the car accident. Since North Dakota is a modified comparative negligence state, drivers can claim damages so long as they were only

Fargo, North Dakota personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Morton County Court, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

North Dakota is a modified comparative negligence state It allocates fault to all parties involved, thus reducing how much each party can recover from the car a

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Minnesota follows the “comparative negligence” rule. Under this system, a plaintiff's compensation can be reduced by a percentage that equals their share of fault in causing the accident. If a plaintiff is found to be more than 50% at fault, they are barred from recovering d

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Minnesota follows the “comparative negligence” rule. Under this system, a plaintiff's compensation can be reduced by a percentage that equals their share of fault in causing the accident. If a plaintiff is found to be more than 50% at fault, they are barred fro

Cedar Rapids, Iowa personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Missouri is a pure comparative negligence state. The law allows you to sue for damages even if you are 99 percent at fault for your own injuries. However, as in the example above, a jury will reduce your award by your percentage of fault.

Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, 2316-CV23414, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Missouri follows a comparative negligence principle which means even if you're partially at fault for an accident, you can still receive

Cape Girardeau, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on wrongful death negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court, Dunklin County, 23DU-CC00043, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

"Brooke Langeneckert, 32, of Herculaneum was driving north on I-55 south of Richardson Road in Arnold at 2:50 p.m. when her 2003 Ford Must

St. Louis, Missouri personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, 23SL-CC02908, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Missouri follows a comparative negligence principle which means even if you're partially at fault for an accident, you can still re

Hot Springs, Arkansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

Arkansas is a modified comparative fault state. This means that if a victim is found to be 50% at fault for their injuries, they will be barred from recovering compensation of any kind. Multiple parties can have acted negligently, contributing to a victim's injuries, incl

El Dorado, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Negligence, the legal theory behind most injury lawsuits, is the violation of a duty owed to another individual. In other words, to do something (or not do something) a "reasonable person" wouldn't (or would) do -- such as driving drunk or failing to ensure the safety

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyers sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Saline County Circuit Court, 63CV-22-01168-2, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Premises liability is a form of personal injury law in Arkansas that deals with accidents that occur on property owned by an individual or a legal ent

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Negligence, the legal theory behind most injury lawsuits, is the violation of a duty owed to another individual. In other words, to do something (or not do something) a "reasonable person" wouldn't (or would) do -- such as driving drunk or failing to ensure the safety

East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court, Franklin County, Illinois, case number 22-LA-56, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

(740 ILCS 130/1)

Sec. 1. This Act is called and may be cited as the "Premises Liability Act".

S

East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury track wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or dam

Peoria, Illinois personal injury slip and fall law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Premises liability law revolves around holding property owners and operators accountable if their careless or negligent actions cause harm to those who have a right to be on the premises. As with any personal injury case in Illinois, a premises liability

Rock Island, Illinois personal injury slip and fall law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability Negligence theory.

(740 ILCS 130/2) (from Ch. 80, par. 302)
(Text of Section WITH the changes made by P.A. 89-7, which has been held unconstitutional)
Sec. 2. The distinction under the common law between invitees and licensees as to the duty owed by an

Peoria, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damages.

Chicago, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the The Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, 2021 L 008366, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified compar