Chicago, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damages.

Hammond, Indiana personal injury slip and fall law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

In Indiana, slip-and-fall claims are based on negligence and premises liability principles. Under Indiana law, homeowners, businesses, and landlords must ensure that their properties are reasonably free of potential hazards to residents, customers, employ

South Bend, Indiana personal injury slip and fall law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

In Indiana, slip-and-fall claims are based on negligence and premises liability principles. Under Indiana law, homeowners, businesses, and landlords must ensure that their properties are reasonably free of potential hazards to residents, customers, emp

South Bend, Indiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover damages as long as you are not more than 50 percent responsible for the accident. However, your percentage of fault will reduce the amount of c

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the Hamilton Circuit Court, 29C01-2309-CT-008726, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

"In Indiana, slip-and-fall claims are based on negligence and premises liability principles. Under Indiana law, homeowners, business

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Hamilton Circuit Court, 29C01-2305-CT-004403, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Premises liability law in Indiana is designed to protect individuals who are injured on another person's property due to the propert

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Marion Superior Court 2, 49D02-2110-CT-036154, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover dam

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case is about a truck crash. Albalawneh styled his Complaint, (ECF No. 1-2), as several paragraphs of general allegations followed by two "causes of action" and a demand for "exemplary damages."

Kansas City, Mo criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Meth Trafficking .

Agents Seized 700 Kilos of Meth Hidden in Trailer, 66 Kilos of Meth and Nine Firearms Seized at Residence

Nashville, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Putnam County Circuit Court, 2023-cv-310, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omis

Nashville, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Plaintiffs Barry Nicholson and Anita Nicholson (“Plaintiffs”) originally commenced this action in the Circuit Court for Dickson County, Tennessee against Defendants Gurjant Singh (“Singh”) and Shagan Transport, Inc. (“Shagan Transport”) for “injuries and damages arisin

Nashville, Tennessee personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Wilson County, Tenn, 22-cv-592, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Tennessee uses what is commonly referred to as the “49 percent rule.” A person is entitled to recover damages so long as thei

Jackson, Tennessee personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Benson County, 22-CV-11, and was removed to federal court by Defendant.

Tennessee uses what is commonly referred to as the “49 percent rule.” A person is entitled to recover damages so long as their own negligence is not more than th

Louisville, Kentucky personal injury lawyer presented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filing in the Jefferson Circuit Court, 22-CI-004113, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

If you are a visitor to a person's home or apartment, property, or business, and are injured as a result of a dangerous condition or hazard, you

Paducah, Kentucky personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Graves Circuit Court, 20-CI-00174, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

If you are a visitor to a person's home or apartment, property, or business, and are injured as a result of a dangerous condition or haz

Louisville, Kentucky personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Louisville, Kentucky, a personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the plaintiff, who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Kentucky is a pure comparative negligence state. If both you and the other party in an accident are partially responsible for causing the accident, the fault will be distributed between you both in percentages.

Covington, Kentucky personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Kentucky is a pure comparative negligence state. If both you and the other party in an accident are partially responsible for causing the accident, the fault will be distributed between you both in percentages.

01/10/2024 111 Proposed Agreed Order extending dea

Covington, Kentucky personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence insurance law theory.

Dayton, Ohio personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Ohio, 2023 CV 06192, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Ohio negligence laws follow the modified comparative negligence approach which reduces damages in proportion to the claimant's degree of fault.

Columbus, Ohio personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Plaintiff Kevin D. Hardwick filed this action against 3M Company, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, the Chemours Company, Archroma Management L.L.C. (“Archroma”), Arkema, Inc. (“Arkema America”), Arkema France, S.A. (“Arkema France”), Daikin Industries Ltd. (“Daikin Industri

Columbus, Ohio personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Ohio negligence laws follow the modified comparative negligence approach which reduces damages in proportion to the claimant's degree of fault. However, if a claimant is found to be 51% or more at fault for their damages, they are barred from recovering anything.

Dayton, Ohio personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.


Ohio negligence laws follow the modified comparative negligence approach which reduces damages in proportion to the claimant's degree of fault. However, if a claimant is found to be 51% or more at fault for their damages, they are barred from recovering anything.

Cincinnati, Ohio personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Ohio negligence laws follow the modified comparative negligence approach which reduces damages in proportion to the claimant's degree of fault. However, if a claimant is found to be 51% or more at fault for their damages, they are barred from recovering anything.