Cleveland, Ohio personal injury slip and fall lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Premises liability is a legal concept that holds property owners or operators liable for injuries suffered by people on their premises. These cases arise when an individual sustains an injury due to the dangerous conditions of a property, such as slippery flo

Youngstown, Ohio personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Ohio negligence laws follow the modified comparative negligence approach which reduces damages in proportion to the claimant's degree of fault. However, if a claimant is found to be 51% or more at fault for their damages, they are barred from recovering anything.

Detroit, Michigan personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on premises liability theories.

This case was filed in the Jackson County Circuit Court, 23-01127-NO, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.


Premises liability cases are like other negligence cases in that the plaintiff must prove the following elements: (1) a duty owed to the plainti

Detroit, Michigan personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Washtenaw County Circuit Court, 23-001633-NI, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

The Plaintiff sought remand to the state court because the federal court lacked jurisdiction.

Michigan’s comparative negligence

St. Louis, Missouri criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Drug, Gun Crimes .

St. Louis Man Sentenced to 65 Months in Prison for Drug, Gun Crimes

Detroit, Michigan personal injury slip and fall lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Premises liability cases are like other negligence cases in that the plaintiff must prove the following elements: (1) a duty owed to the plaintiff by the defendant, (2) a breach of that duty, (3) an injury proximately resulting from that breach, and (4) dam

Detroit, Michigan personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Under Michigan negligence laws use a structure called “comparative negligence.” Essentially, when a person has been injured and files a personal injury claim seeking damages, he or she must prove the party that caused the injury was at least partially at fault for the

San Antonio, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a wrongful death negligence theory.

Yazmin Juarez Coyoy is a migrant from Guatemala. She was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") in Texas shortly after she crossed the border from Mexico, accompanied by her 19-month-old daughter, Mariee Camyl Newberry Juarez. While the tw

Pecos, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the 112th District Court, P-12873-112-CV, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a
premises defect theory. The elements to establish a premises
liability c

San Antonio, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar Co., Texas, 2023CI22266, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a premises defect theory. The elements to establish

Austin, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the 419th District Court, Travis County, D-1-GN-22-006727, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a premises defect theory. The elements to establish a premises

Austin, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the 480th Judicial District Court of Williamson Co. TX, 23-01341-C480, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiff

El Paso, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Texas, is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiffs can sue for damages even if they are partially at fault for an accident. However, if they are found to be more than 50% to blame for an

San Antonio, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 438th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, TX, 2023CI24493, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiff

Austin, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 453rd Judicial District Court of Hays County, Texa, 21-02083, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Texas, is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiffs c

Dallas, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the County Court at Law No 5 of Dallas County, TX, CC-22-04793-E, and was removed to federal court.

A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a premises defect theory. The elements to establish a premises liability c

Abilene, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas, CC-22-05707-C, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiffs

Fort Worth, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the United States on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Fort Worth, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 43rd District Court- Parker County, CV23-1283, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiff

Dallas, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Dallas County Court at Law No. 2, CC-23-00227-B, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiffs c

Burlington, Vermont criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Pandemic Fraud.

New Haven, Vermont Woman Sentenced to Prison Term for Pandemic Fraud

Charleston, South Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Some states subscribe to the “pure comparative negligence” rule, where a plaintiff can recover damages even if he or she was 99 percent at-fault. But South Carolina follows the “modified comparative negligence” rule, with a 51 percent bar. Here, the plain

San Francisco, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with participating in a conspiracy that targeted U.S. military personnel and property in Iraq.

Rock Hill, South Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, 2023-CP-12-00086, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Some states subscribe to the “pure comparative negligence” rule, where a plaintiff can recover damages even if he or

Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

To bring a premises liability claim in North Carolina, a plaintiff will need to prove the following elements: The property owner owed you a duty of care (lawfully on the property), a dangerous condition existed, and the property owner knew of or should have known