Butte, Montana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Montana Fifth Judicial District Court, DV-29-02022-79, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

The elements on a personal injury claim in Montana are duty of care, failure to exercise due care, damage, and a direct casual link.

Great Falls, Montana personal injury law truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on auto negligence theories.

Montana negligence laws follow the doctrine of modified comparative negligence. This means that a plaintiff can't be more than 51 percent negligent or responsible for the injury, or they will be barred from recovery.

The elements on a personal injury claim are duty

Reno, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

The elements of a Nevada auto negligence claim are negligence, causation, and damages.

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, A-22-852222-C, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

The basic principles of premises liability are: A property owner has a duty to keep their property safe for entrants. However, they do not

Reno, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, A-23-884351-C.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of the

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

The elements of an auto negligence claim are duty of care, negligence, causation, and damages.

Negligence is the failure to comply with the applicable standard of care: the requisite standard of conduct objective.

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.


Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

The elements of a Federal Tort C

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

Colorado's product liability laws allow injured consumers to file lawsuits for defective products based on strict liability, negligence or breach of warranty.

Colorado product liability actions are based on negligence or strict liability and may include claims of design defec

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

To prevail on a claim of medical malpractice in Colorado, a plaintiff must prove that a healthcare provider failed to conform to an acceptable standard of health care and that this failure caused injury. A jury will compare the defendant’s conduct with w

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

On June 29, 2018, plaintiff Jodi Sheldon was seriously injured while participating in a high ropes course at the Golden Bell Ranch ("Golden Bell"). Ms. Sheldon sued Golden Bell under Colorado's Premises Liability Act ("PLA"), §13-21-115, C.R.S. She also brought a claim of negligence again

Central Islip, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of NY, County of Nassau, 604341/2020, and was removed to the federal court by the Defendant.

n New York, premises liability is generally defined as responsibilities placed upon owners and occupiers of pr

Brooklyn, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

"Individuals who are injured or whose property is damaged by the wrongful or negligent act of a federal employee acting in the scope of his or her official duties may file a claim with the government for reimbursement for that injury or damage. In order to stat

Las Cruces, New Mexico personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence wrongful death theory.

Yismary Diaz Cuellar as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jorge Diaz Corrales, Deceased
estate of Jorge Diaz Corrales, Deceased, filed this case in the Fifth Judicial District Court, 21cv0815, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Second Judicial District Court, Bernalillo County, D-202-CV-23-05271, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

"New Mexico has created specific laws for trucking accidents that can help protect injured vict

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Tenth Judicial District Court, Harding County, D-1010-CV-23-00031, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Negligence claims are the legal system's method for determining fault in injury-causing accidents and how much, if anything,

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

New Mexico is a "pure comparative negligence" state. This means you can still recover damages in a car-accident-related lawsuit, but your award will be reduced according to your share of negligence. For instance, suppose that the jury determines that your injuries

El Paso, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the County Court at Law No. 6 of El Paso County, T, #2023DCV2267, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Premises liability cases can be confusing and complicated for the average person to understand. This type of case is a persona

Austin, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 368TH Judicial District Court of Williamson County, 23-00532-C368, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

What Are The 5 Elements of Negligence in Texas?

Duty. According to Texas law, negligence cases are determined by the presence

El Paso, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 57th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, TX, 2023-CI-12180, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Landowners have a duty to invitees to make premises reasonable safe, they have a duty to warn, or they have a duty to make

Indianapolis, Indiana personal insurance lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligent failure to secure private information theories.

What Must You Prove in an Indiana Personal Injury Lawsuit?

The defendant owed the victim a duty of care.
The defendant breached their duty of care.
You were hurt because of the defendant's breach.

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

There are three possible theories of liability in a product liability case: (1) strict liability, (2) breach
of warranty, and (3), negligence.

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damages.

L’Oréal USA le

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Oklahoma County District Court, CJ-23-03651, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.


On November 26, 2022, the Plaintiff was an invitee on the premises owned by the Defendant. The Plaintiff alleged that the Defen

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendant on product liability theories.

Products liability claims in Oklahoma can be based on three areas: negligence, strict liability, or a breach of warranty. If a product is defective due to the way it was designed or constructed, either the manufacturer, seller, or distributor is strictly liable f

New York, New York civil fraud lawyers represented the Defendants charged with fiduciary fraud for their roles in opeating the National Rife Association.

LaPierre was the CEO, Phillips was the CFO, and Frazer was General Counsel.

The New York Attorney General's office alleged that the Defendants engaged in self-dealing, and lax financial oversight at the highest levels of the Nat