Spokane, Washington personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75 million in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Spokane County Superior Court, 21-200541-32
9CCA, 22-35714 and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Duty of care: All drivers in Wa

Richland, Washington personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on wrongful death auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $5 million in damages and/or injuries.

Seattle, Washington personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on motor vehicle product liability theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Motor vehicle product liability law protects consumers from injuries caused by defective or malfunctioning vehicles and their components. It's a complex area of law with various fact

Seattle, Washington personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Federal Tort Claims Act Law:

the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) is a federal law and applies throughout the United States, including Washington State, it do

Seattle, Washington personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the King County Superior Court, 22-00002-16888-9 SEA, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Washington Auto Negligence Law:

Duty of

Portland, Oregon personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Multnomah County Circuit Court, 22CV25585, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Oregon Auto Negligence Law Overview:

Oregon law refer

Portland, Oregon personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the County of Multnomah, 21CV31232, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Oregon Auto Negligence Law Overview:

Oregon law refers to the l

Eureka, California personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on Federal Torts Claims Act auto negligence negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $1.2 billion in damages and/or injuries.

Oakland, California personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or injuries.

Los Angeles, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, 23LBCV01487, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Defendant filed a motion to remand the case to the Superior Court

Los Angeles, California personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto nglgience negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Los Angeles, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a result of

Los Angeles, Calofornia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on atuo negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of CA, County of Los Angeles, 23AHCV02101, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Santa Ana, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Riverside, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.


This case was filed in the County of Riverside, CVPS2303499, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Plaintiff filed a motion to remand.

Riverside, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, CIVSB2223434, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Plaintiff's car was hit from behind while she was stopped on South Memorial Drived on January 8, 2023.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle which was driven by Defendant Lollis who made a left turn and his car was struck by an oncoming vehicle resulting in Plaintiff being injured.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on premises liablity negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

On December 23, 2020, Plaintiff was a business invitee at Chic Fil A's restaurant on South Memorial in Tulsa, Oklahoma when she tripped over an extension cord that was used for the Christma

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on Governmental Torts Claims Act auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on am auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

On or about July 23, 202, Defendant Antonio Martinez ws driving a 1996 Honda Accord south on Highway 169 near East 21st Street in Tulsa. Defendant was in the middle southbound lane. Plaintif

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on premises liability negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

On or about the 5th day of Mrch 2020, Plaintiff was very seriously injured while a business invitee of Defendants Law Americas Supermerado #3. Plaintiff fell while entering the store.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Plaintiff claimed that she was invited to Defendants' residence for a gathering on July 19, 2017. While leaving the event she fall and was injured as a result of a defective and dangerous condition that the

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Key Elements of Oklahoma Auto Negligence:

Duty of care: Every person in Oklahoma has a duty to act with reasonable care in any situation where their actions could