LaDonna S. Cade and John Cade v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp., et al.
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs on negligence, breach of warranty and product liability theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a total knee replacement that was defective and unreasonably dangerous.
More... $0 (01-05-2023 - OK)
Claudel Fils-Aime v. Adriana Colman, et al.
Miami, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered less than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a result of a motor vehicle accident caused by a Lyft, Inc. employee.
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of motor vehicle accident that occurred on December 5, 2020, which Defendant allegedly ran a red light.
The Estate of David Bryan Dyer v. Terry Lynn Spurlock
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on August 12, 2015, in Tulsa County.
Stillwater, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result on a motor vehicle accident caused by Defendant's failure to exercise due care.
table>
Will Hodges and Spring Hodges v. St. Luke's United Methodist Foundation, Inc., et al.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued defendant on a negligence theory claiming that there child, S.H. was injured while a patient at Defendant's hospital on October 31, 2018 including serious injuries to his left leg and buttock area from unknown causes.
Norma Burton and Maxima Cedillo v. Jordan Nix, Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and EAN Holdings, d/b/a Enterprise Holdings
Lawton, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and injuries as a direct result of an auto accident caused by Defendant.
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and injuries as a direct result of an auto accident caused by Defendant.
Dominique McQuilkin v. Jordan Anthony Robinson and Norman Door & Plywood, LLC
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Defendant that occurred in Cleveland County.
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and injuries as a direct result of an auto accident caused by Defendant.
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Defendant.
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure on the Defendant to exercise due care in the operation of her motor vehicle.
Plaintiff claimed that she was a passenger in a vehicle driving by her daughter that was struck
Rebecca Tickell v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al.
New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a marine negligence theory claiming more that $2,000,000 in damages.
Thomas Montgomery and Peggie Montgomery v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Mobile, Alabama insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of contract theory claiming more than $75,000 in damages and as a direct result of the breach.
Patricia Rothleitner and Mark Rothleitner v. Norstrom, Inc.
Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $2,000,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores.
MOM v. Scott Robinson, Vanessa Robinson and Allison Campbell Deberry
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on premises liability negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and injuries as a direct result of a dangerous condition on property where he was an invitee.
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
Sacramento, California personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores.
Sacramento, California personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a medical malpractice negligence theory claiming that Defendant did not provide appropriate care for Mr. Sam Rios.
Plaintiff claimed that Defendant prioritized profits over patient care and cut staffing until conditions were unsafe for residents like Sam Rios, age 86, who developed pressure ulcers on