Discrimination Law
 
Tanjaneka Jones v. Eli Lilly And Company

Baltimore, Maryland employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on sex and race based discrimination and retaliation theories.

Jones, a Black woman, alleged that she was disciplined more severely than a White male coworker, even though both employees had exhibited similar performance deficiencies. She further alleged that her supervisor
retaliated against her after she co... More...
   $0 (07-03-2025 - MD)

Jacqueline M. Morrow v. City of Overland Park

Kansas City, Kansas employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.

... More...
   $1 (07-02-2025 - KS)

Colleen Stuart v. City of Topeka, Kansas

Kansas City, Kansas employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination theory. theory.... More...   $1 (07-02-2025 - KS)

Merrier A. Jackson Tartt v. Unified School District No. 475

Wichita, Kansas employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on job discrimination and retaliation theories.

Merrier A. Jackson Tartt is a Black woman with years of experience as an educator. She served for a time as principal of Junction City High School, which is part of the Unified School District No. 475 (the District) in the state of Kansas. After the District refused to ... More...
   $0 (06-27-2025 - KS)

Anthony B. Sullers, Sr. v. International Union Elevator Constructors, Local 2

Chicago, Illinois employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a job discrimination claim.

Anthony Sullers, Sr., an elevator mechanic who is African American, brought this action against his union, the International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local 2 (“IUEC” or “the Union”). He alleged that IUEC had breached its duty of fair representation in its handling of his allega... More...
   $0 (06-27-2025 - IL)

Mary Ann Arnold v. United Airlines, Inc.

Chicago, Illinois employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a job discrimination theory.

Mary Ann Arnold brought this action against her former employer, United Airlines (“United” or “the Company”), alleging unlawful discrimination and retaliation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) and the Illinois Human Rights Act (“IHRA”). Ms. Arnold also ... More...
   $0 (06-27-2025 - IL)

Cheryl Butler v. Jennifer M. Collins, et al.

Dallas, Texas employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights job discrimination claim.

Southern Methodist University (“SMU”) previously employed Plaintiff-Appellant Cheryl Butler as a non-tenured law professor at the SMU Dedman School of Law. After being denied tenure in 2016 and leaving the law school in 2017, Butler sued SMU and a number of its administrators and... More...
   $0 (06-25-2025 - TX)

Darren Markley v. U.S. Bank National Association, d/b/a US Bank

Denver, Colorado employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a job discrimination claim.

Darren Markley sued his employer, US Bank, in federal court, asserting a federal claim for age discrimination and a state law claim for wrongful termination. The district court resolved the federal claim in the employer’s favor but declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state... More...
   $0 (06-24-2025 - CO)

Kimberly S. Carder v. Metso USA, Inc.

Columbia, South Carolina civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an Americans with Disabilities Act theory.

* * *

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a landmark civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in various areas of public life. It ensures equal opportunities for people with disabilities in employment, public se... More...
   $1 (06-24-2025 - SC)

Michele Miller v. Walmart Associates, Inc.

Charleston, South Carolina labor and employment lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a job discrimination claim.

* * *

Federal laws enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (.gov) prohibit job discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age (40 or older), disability, and genetic information. These laws, including Title VII of the Civil Right... More...
   $0 (06-24-2025 - SC)

Kevin Akinjobi v. Pegasus Steel, LLC

Charleston, South Carolina labor and employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a job discrimination civil rights violation theory.

* * *

42 U.S.C. 2000e-2, part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This includes discrimination in hiring, firing, compensation, and other ... More...
   $0 (06-24-2025 - SC)

Dr. Sari Edelman v. NYU Langone Health System, et al.

New York, New York employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on New York and federal Equal Pay
Acts, and for gender discrimination and retaliation under Title VII, the New York
State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law violation theories.

Dr. Sari Edelman, a female rheumatologist formerly employed by the New York University hospital system, sued various... More...
   $700000 (06-23-2025 - NY)

Misty Blanchette Porter, M.D. v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, et al.

Burlington, Vermont civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on employment discrimination theories.

* * *

Blanchette Porter was among three fertility doctors terminated when DHMC abruptly shut down its division of reproductive endocrinology and infertility, or REI, in May 2017.

In her lawsuit, Blanchette Porter alleged that DHMC had retaliat... More...
   $0 (06-20-2025 - VT)

Jamall S. Baker v. Tammy O'Reilly

Seattle, Washington civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a prisoner civil rights violation claim.

* * *

Prisoner civil rights laws protect inmates from violations of their constitutional rights while incarcerated. These laws safeguard against cruel and unusual punishment, discrimination, and denial of due process. Key areas of protection include freedom from excessiv... More...
   $0 (06-18-2025 - wa)

Stephen D. Woodbridge v. The City of Greenfield

Springfield, Massachusetts personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Civil Rights Act violation theory.

* * *

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a landmark US law that prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It addresses discrimination in various areas including voting, public accommodations, public education, and employment. Th... More...
   $1 (06-18-2025 - MA)

Heather Hutchison v. Ranch and Home Supply, LLC, d/b/a Murdock's Ranch & Home Supply

Denver, Colorado civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintff on a job discrimination claimed under 42:2000(e)(2)-(o)(t)

* * *
42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, which is part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits unlawful employment practices based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This includes discrimination by employers, employment agencies, and labor organ... More...
   $1 (06-17-2025 - CO)

Lora Premo v. Starbucks Corporation

Denver, Colorado civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Discrimination) theory.

The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a broad civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on disability in several areas, including employment, public services, public accommodations, and telecommunications. It ensures equal opportuniti... More...
   $1 (06-16-2025 - CO)

Keenan H. Meadors v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the parties in a Job Discrimination (Employment) 42 U.A.X. 2000e casa.

42 U.S.C. 2000e, also known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It applies to employers, employment agencies, and labor organizations. This law makes it illegal to dis... More...
   $0 (06-13-2025 - OK)

Prielinso Conner v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

San Antonio, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a Job Discrimination (Employment) claim

Federal employment law prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, and gender identity), national origin, age (40 or older), disability, and genetic information. This protection extends to various aspects of employment, in... More...
   $1 (06-13-2025 - TX)

Sadie Foster v. BNSF Railway Company

Austin, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff on an Americans with Disabilities Act theory.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a US civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on disability. It ensures equal opportunities for individuals with disabilities in various aspects of public life, including employment, state and local government services, public... More...
   $0 (06-13-2025 - TX)

Jesus Yanez v. Dish Network, LLC, etc.

El Paso, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination theory.

In 2001, EchoStar Communications Corporation (“EchoStar”) hired
Appellant Jesus Yanez as a customer service representative at its El Paso,
Texas location. As part of his day one onboarding, Yanez allegedly signed an
arbitration agreement purporting to bind Yanez, ... More...
   $0 (06-13-2025 - TX)

E.R. v. Beaufort County School District

Beaufordt, South Carolina civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Title IX theory alleging
that Appellee failed to appropriately respond to her reports of sexual abuse and harassment while she was a student.

Title IX prohibits sex discrimination by recipients of federal education funding. The statute provides that “[n]o person in the United States shall, on the b... More...
   $0 (06-13-2025 - SC)

Min Tang v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Greenbelt, Maryland civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a job discrimination retaliation theory brought pursuant to o Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17.
... More...
   $0 (06-13-2025 - MD)

Greta J. Hurt, et al. v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers are representing the Plaintiffs on 42 U.S.C. 2000e job discrimination theories.


COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs Greta J. Hurt and Julie D. Lynn, ("Hurt" and "Lynn") allege:
1. This action is brought on behalf of the Plaintiffs to enforce the provisions of Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq. ("Title VII... More...
   $0 (06-13-2025 - OK)

Howard Cohan v. Nordstrom, Inc.

West Palm Beach, Florida rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a landmark civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in various areas of public life, including employment, public services, public accommodations, and transportation. It ... More...
   $0 (06-08-2025 - FL)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher