Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e, which provides, according to Google AI:

42 U.S.C. 2000e, also known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits discrimination in employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
Key Aspects:

Prohibits Discrim... More...   $0 (02-03-2025 - OK)

Miami, Florida civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on race discrimination, disability discrimination, and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a), 2000e-3(a), the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, id. §§ 12112(a), 12203(a), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794(a), and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § ... More...   $0 (01-31-2025 - FL)

Washington, DC criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with engaging in a pattern or practice of lending discrimination by disproportionately discouraging and denying Black and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) graduates seeking to refinance their student loans.
Justi... More...   $0 (01-19-2025 - DC)

Boston, Massachusetts civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff religious discrimination theory.

George Rodrique, II sued his
employer, Hearst Stations, Inc. ("Hearst"), after it denied his
request for a religious exemption from the company's COVID-19
vaccination requirement and then terminated him for refusing to
receive the vaccine. Rodrique claims that Hearst's fail... More...   $0 (01-17-2025 - ma)

Boston, Massachusetts employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a sex discrimination claim.

The plaintiff, an assistant dean at the University of Massachusetts (UMass), claimed the defendants unlawfully discriminated against her on the basis of sex in determining her starting salary when she was promoted to that position. Her amended complaint included counts under both the Mass... More...   $0 (01-17-2025 - MA)

Boston, Massachusetts employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an Americans With Disabilities Act violation theory.


Jesse Sutherland had a rocky eight-month period employed as an oil service technician at
Peterson's Oil Service, Inc. ("Peterson's"). Two months into his new job with the company, Sutherland injured his right knee, tearing his meniscus in two plac... More...   $0 (01-16-2025 - MA)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on employment discrimination and retaliation theories.

Rodriguez worked for the postal service (USPS) beginning in 2003. At times
relevant to this appeal, in 2020–2021, he was a rural carrier at the Sooner Station post
office in Norman, Oklahoma.

* * *

Rodriguez then filed a formal EEO comp... More...   $0 (01-15-2025 - OK)

Muskogee, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on race and sex discrmination and retaliation theories.

Marci Walkingstick Dixon worked at Northeastern State University (“NSU�).
Richard Reif was her supervisor. After NSU fired her, she sued NSU for Title VII
sex and race discrimination and Title VII retaliation. She sued Dr. Reif for
retaliation u... More...   $0 (01-14-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful termination theory.

Sondia Bell worked for the City of Tulsa’s Information and Technology (IT) department. Across twelve months, the City twice suspended her without pay and then it fired her. She sued, alleging that the City’s actions were
discriminatory and retaliatory. The City moved for sum... More...   $0 (01-14-2025 - OK)

Alexandria, Virginia civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful termination theory.

Barnett, a former registered nurse and employee of INOVA, refused to receive
the COVID-19 vaccine as required under INOVA’s policy because of its alleged conflict
with her religious belief. INOVA discharged her, and Barnett filed a Title VII religious
discrimination ... More...   $0 (01-10-2025 - VA)

Wichita, Kansas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants for age discrimination.

Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. adopted a reduction-in-force that led to 271 firings. Many of the fired employees brought suit, including a collective action against Spirit for age discrimination. To prevail on the collective action, the former employees needed to prove a pattern or pra... More...   $0 (01-07-2025 - KS)

Norfolk, Virginia civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights discrimination theory.

Marty Hierholzer (“Hierholzerâ€�) is the sole owner, president, and chief executive of MJL Enterprises, LLC (“MJLâ€�) (collectively “Appellantsâ€�). Appellants allege that the Small Business Administration’s (“SBAâ€�) Section 8(a) Business Development Program (â€... More...   $0 (01-03-2025 - VA)

Alexandria, Virginia pros se Plaintiff sued on an Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 theory.

Defendant filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted by the Court.... More...   $0 (12-19-2024 - VA)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a sex discrimination theory.

The district court dismissed Appellant Harold Rutila’s complaint alleging sex
discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and denied
his motion to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
9(e).

* * *
Mr. Rut... More...   $0 (12-18-2024 - OK)

Lincoln, Nebraska employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a wrongful discharge theory.

ourtney Galloway sued her employer, Husker Auto Group, LLC (Husker Auto), alleging (1) retaliation in violation of
[318 Neb. 180] the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act (NFEPA)[1] and (2) wrongful discharge under Nebraska's public policy exception to the at-will employment rule. Specif... More...   $0 (12-17-2024 - NE)

Dallas, Texas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who contested the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act.

Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act provides “an individual shall not, on the ground[s] prohibited underâ€� any of four civil rights statutes, “be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any health... More...   $0 (12-16-2024 - TX)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.... More...   $1 (12-16-2024 - OK)

Camden, New Jersey employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who claimed that he was wrongfully denied employment.


In 2021, as part of its efforts to legalize and regulate
marijuana use “in a similar fashion to the regulation of alcohol
for adults,� New Jersey enacted the Cannabis Regulatory,
Enforcement Assistance, and Marketplace Modernization Act
– refe... More...   $0 (12-09-2024 - NJ)

Wilmington, Delaware employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a employment discrimination theory.

On May 29, 2018, Defendant hired Plaintiff.[4] Defendant first allegedly discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of race in January 2020, and Plaintiff first allegedly suffered retaliation in March 2020, when she was transferred to another role in Defend... More...   $0 (12-05-2024 - DE)

San Bernardino, California employment lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a defamation theory claiminng that he was falsely accused of fraud before firing him while he was on medical leave.

Jesus “Jesseâ€� Fonseca worked as a truck driver for Walmart’s Apple Valley Distribution Center for 14 years before he was hurt on the job when another vehicle rear-ended his truck on a hi... More...   $0 (11-22-2024 - CA)