Cleveland, Ohio employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on civil rights violation theories.

MetroHealth is a county-owned hospital in Cleveland, Ohio. In August 2021, it required
its entire workforce to get vaccinated against COVID-19. At the same time, MetroHealth allowed
employees to request exemptions for medical or religious reasons. MetroHealth received over

Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence claim.

This case was filed in the County Court at Law No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas, CC-23-06164-B, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

In Texas, auto negligence law dictates that drivers have a duty to operate their vehicles safely and responsibly, adhering to traffic laws and exe

Amarillo, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff seeking declaratory and injunctive relief.

Carmen Purl wanted to protect her patients by reporting suspected abuse and safeguard the health and safety of mothers and children. The Biden-Harris administration’s recent regulation changes, however, illegally restrict how doctors can protect patients from the harms of abortion a

Lubbock, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

CONSPIRACY TO TRANSPORT AN UNDOCUMENTED ALIEN WITHIN THE UNITED STATES

* * *

8 U.S.C. § 1324, also known as the "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" law, is a federal statute that criminalizes various activities related to the entry and presence of unauthorized immigrants in the United

Lubbock, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with transportation of illegal aliens.

8 U.S.C. § 1324, also known as the "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" law, is a federal statute that criminalizes various activities related to the entry and presence of unauthorized immigrants in the United States. It prohibits actions like smuggling, transporting, con

San Angelo, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. 225

18 U.S.C. § 225 outlines the federal crime of engaging in a Continuing Financial Crimes Enterprise (CFCE). It specifically targets individuals who organize, manage, or supervise a series of financial crimes, and who personally receive substantial

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation claim.

In the spring of 2021, Plaintiff Kurt Alexander (“Alexander”) worked as a law enforcement officer for Federal Protective Services (“FPS”), an arm of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), and lived in private military housing at Joint Base Andrews in Mar

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with racketeering, wire fraud, money laundering, and Truth-In-Lending Act (“TILA”) offenses.

* * *

Legal issue Can the government obtain clear title to forfeited substitute assets following a criminal conviction and resolution of all third-party claims?
Headnote

CRIMINAL LAW. FORFE

Shreveport, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud and possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking offense.

San Antonio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cyberstalking and making threats of injury in interstate communications.

Steven Daniel Weste was convicted for cyberstalking and sending threatening interstate communications.He filed a motion to suppress, contending that the warrantless search of his cell phone while in a halfway house violated the Fourth A

Alexandria, Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a prisoner civil rights claim.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, federal courts may permit an indigent prisoner to proceed without prepaying filing fees or giving security. The legal term for proceeding this way is in forma pauperis. But Congress expressed concern that prisoners were filing many “frivolous lawsuits floodin

Rochester, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a prisoner civil rights violation claim.

42 U.S.C. § 1983, often referred to as Section 1983, is a federal law that allows individuals to sue state and local government officials for civil rights violations. It's a crucial tool for holding these officials accountable when they violate a person's constitutional rights

Rochester, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence truck wreck claim.

* * *

In New York, auto negligence cases are governed by pure comparative negligence. This means that if you are injured in a car accident, you can still recover damages even if you are partially at fault for the accident. However, the amount of compensation you receive

Memphis, Tennessee criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud.

Memphis, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and swindles in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1349 and 18 U.S.C. 1341.

Evansville, Indiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with $2 Million Mail Theft Scheme and Firearms Offenses

Princeton Couple Sentenced to Combined 14 Years in Federal Prison for $2 Million Mail Theft Scheme and Firearms Offenses

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud, bank fraud and and conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud.

George Guldi worked with his former girlfriend Victoria Davidson to persuade a mortgage servicer to wire her $253,236 that did not belong to either of them.

Brooklyn, New York consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiff in a class action consumer fraud case.

Plaintiffs Gladys Honigman and D. Joseph Kurtz brought two separate class action lawsuits against Defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation, each alleging that Defendant had falsely advertised their moist bathroom wipes as “flushable.” According to Plaintiffs, this led purchasers to pay

Brooklyn, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud in connection with their involvement in a notorious FIFA corruption scandal.

Although the district court (Chen, J.) had previously denied pre-trial motions to dismiss the indictment that raised similar arguments, it granted Defendants’ post-trial motions. Th

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1349.

* * *

18 U.S.C. § 1349, which addresses Attempt and Conspiracy, makes it a federal crime to attempt or conspire to commit wire fraud. This means that if two or more people agree to carry out a fraudulent scheme involving electronic commu

Wichita, Kansas insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence insurance claim.

Kansas follows a modified comparative negligence system in auto accident cases. This means that if a driver is partially at fault for an accident, they can still recover damages, but their compensation will be reduced by their percentage of fault. However, if a driver is 50% or more at f

Boston, Massachusetts qui tam lawyers represented the Plaintiff suing on a False Claims Act fraud theory.

Martin Flanagan brought this qui tam suit against Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. ("Fresenius"), under the False Claims Act ("FCA"), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, alleging a fraudulent kickback scheme related to referrals to Fresenius-operated dialysis clinics. The district court dismissed

Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with filing false claims to BPD for overtime pay and his participation in a scheme to submit such claims and wire fraud.

Evans entered BPD's police academy in 1983 and was promoted to the rank of Captain on January 20, 2010. Captain is the highest-ranking position within the BPD that can be achieved without b

New Orleans, sta criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with
Romanian Man Sentenced for Conspiracy to Commit Access Device Fraud