| Imputed Fault Law |
| |
|
Diane S. Jones v. P2ES Holdings, LLC
|
|
Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.
Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is over 50% at fault for an accident, they give up their right to receive compensation for damages. Other states throughout the country have similar regulations in place regarding traffic accidents.
... More... $0 (04-22-2024 - CO)
|
|
Salvador Nava, et al. v. Haryana Star, Inc., et al.
|
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the Eleventh Judicial District Court, D-1113-CV-22-00418, and was removed to federal court by Haryana Star, Inc. et al.
New Mexico follows the pure comparative negligence doctrine. This means that a victim may pursue compensation even if they w... More... $1 (04-21-2024 - NM)
|
|
EDDIE L. CADDELL v. STATE OF KANSAS
|
|
Topeka, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with rape and aggravated indecent liberties with a child .
Caddell was charged with rape and aggravated indecent liberties with a child in
one case and aggravated criminal ... More...
$0 (04-19-2024 - KS)
|
|
Malea Bacon, et al. v. Wright Tree Service, et al.
|
|
Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 3rd District, Salt Lake County, 220907, and was removed by Wright Tree Service.
Utah has a comparative negligence law in place that has a 50 percent fault bar. This means that if you are at least half at fault, you will not retain anything from... More... $0 (04-19-2024 - UT)
|
|
United States of America v. Nerik Ilyayev
|
|
New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Health Care Fraud.
Pharmacy Owner Sentenced To Four Years In Prison For Health Care Fraud
NERIK ILYAYEV was sentenced today to four years in prison for his involveme... More...
$0 (04-18-2024 - NY)
|
|
Rebecca Nelson, et al. v. C.R. England, Inc., et al.
|
|
Hammond, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the Porter Superior Court 2, 64D02-2212-CT-010418, and was removed to federal court by C.R. England, Inc. et al.
Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover... More... $1 (04-18-2024 - IN)
|
|
Ashley Blevins v. Ronnie B. King. Jr. and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
|
|
Jackson, Mississippi personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, 23-00337 and was removed to federal courts by Ronnie B. King. Jr. and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
Mississippi has a pure comparative negligence system. This means that you can still r... More... $0 (04-18-2024 - MS)
|
|
Bradley Templeton, et al. v. FedEx Freight, Inc.
|
|
Houston, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 80th District Court of Harris County, TX, 22-13419, and was removed to federal court by Fedex.
Texas follows the modified comparative negligence rule, also known as the 51% Bar Rule. This means that if a plaintiff is found to be 50% or les... More... $1 (04-17-2024 - TX)
|
|
Everett Reed, III v. The Lane Construction Corporation
|
|
Austin, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 126th District Court, Travis County, Texas, D-1-GN-23-000156, and was removed to federal court by The Lane Construction Corporation.
Texas follows the modified comparative negligence rule, also known as the 51% Bar Rule. This means that if ... More... $1 (04-17-2024 - TX)
|
|
Dustin Robert Farnsworth v. Sun Energy Services, LLC, d/b/a Deep Well Services, LLC
|
|
Las Cruces, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who used on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Fifth Judicial District Court, D-503-CV-23-00537, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
New Mexico is a pure comparative negligence state. That means that fault can be shared among drivers, with each driver being assigned a percen... More... $0 (04-17-2024 - NM)
|
|
Danielle Joseph Langford v. Star Laundry NYC Corp
|
|
Brooklyn, New York personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compensation for their injuries in proportion to the fault of others. Compensation is diminished by whatever percentage of fault is attributable to the injured party.
... More... $0 (04-17-2024 - NY)
|
|
Edith Amparo v. Yerlan Akhmetov and SEKA Moving Corporation
|
|
New Haven, Connecticut personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Connecticut is one of the many states that have comparative negligence laws. As long as an injured party was not more than 50 percent at fault, then he or she can file a personal injury suit against the parties responsible. This is considered a modified comparative law.
... More... $1 (04-17-2024 - CT)
|
|
Preston Needles, et al. v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company , d/b/a ADM Trucking, Inc.
|
|
Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the Mecklenburg County Superior Court, 23-CVS-8020, and was removed to federal court by Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
also known as ADM Trucking, Inc.
The Plaintiff challenged the jurisdiction of the federal court and sought rema... More... $0 (04-17-2024 - NC)
|
|
Farron Bunch, et al. v. Switchcars, Inc. and Douglas Arthur Tabbutt
|
|
Asheville, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
North Carolina negligence laws follow the doctrine of pure contributory negligence, which bars recovery by the plaintiff if they're just partially at fault (even as little as 1%).... More... $1 (04-17-2024 - NC)
|
|
Gary Williams v. Lampkin Transportation, LLC
|
|
Greensboro, North Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
North Carolina negligence laws follow the doctrine of pure contributory negligence, which bars recovery by the plaintiff if they're just partially at fault (even as little as 1%).... More... $1 (04-17-2024 - NC)
|
|
Powell J. Bernhardt, IV v. Carolina Supreme Trucking LLC, et al.
|
|
Alexandra, Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Virginia uses the pure contributory negligence rule. This is the harshest legal doctrine in personal injury cases involving negligence. The defendant must be 100% at fault for the accident that caused the plaintiff's injuries.... More... $0 (04-16-2024 - VA)
|
|
M.R. v. Dyaln McCloy
|
|
Roanoke, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claiming $350,000 in damages and/or injuries.
Virginia uses the pure contributory negligence rule. This is the harshest legal doctrine in personal injury cases involving negligence. The defendant must be 100% at fault for the accident that caused the plaintiff's injuries.
... More... $0 (04-16-2024 - VA)
|
|
Christopher Stone v. William Scotsman, Inc.
|
|
Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.
Williams Scotsman, Inc. operates as a space solutions. The Company provides solutions for instructional, living, health, office, storage and specialty including modular offices, and permanent modular structures.
Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means... More... $1 (04-15-2024 - CO)
|
|
Katherine Diaz v. Quantem Aviation Services, L.L.C.
|
|
Dallas, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, TX, DC-23-09533, and was removed to federal court by Quantem Aviation Services LLC and Anthony Buckley.
In Texas, negligent parties are held liable for any harms suffered due to their negligence. C... More... $0 (04-15-2024 - TX)
|
|
Vanessa Zientek v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., et al.
|
|
Abilene, Texas personal injury truck wrecks lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the 91st District Court, Eastland County, Texas, CV2246527, and was removed to federal court by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al.
In Texas, negligent parties are held liable for any harms suffered due to their negligence. Commercial ent... More... $1 (04-15-2024 - TX)
|
|
Michael Nedelton, et al. v. Christopher Keebler, et al.
|
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
In Pennsylvania, the comparative negligence system operates under the Modified Comparative Fault Rule, specifically the 51% Bar Rule. Under this rule, an accident victim can still recover damages even if they share some degree of fault for the accident, as lon... More... $1 (04-15-2024 - PA)
|
|
Robin J. Custer, et al. v. Raymond G. Sigler, et al.
|
|
Scranton, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories claiming $1.06 million in damages.
A plaintiff can recover damages if they are less than 51% at fault. If they are found to carry more than 50% of the fault, they cannot seek compensation.
Duty of care: The legal requirement to act safely. Breach of duty of care: Failing ... More... $1 (04-15-2024 - OH)
|
|
Josue Ronaldo Pinto Ponce v. Wendy Dinora Perez Carrera, LLC, et al.
|
|
Grand Rapids, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful death auto negligence theory.
In Michigan, negligence laws use a structure called “comparative negligence.” Essentially, when you've been injured and you file a personal injury claim seeking damages, you must prove the party that injured you was at least partially at fault for your accident.... More... $1 (04-12-2024 - MI)
|
|
Danny R. Bowles v. Apollo Freight Systems, Inc., et al.
|
|
Charleston, West Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Under West Virginia's comparative negligence laws, an injury victim who is 50% or less at fault for an accident can recover compensation for their injuries. Their total amount of damages will then be reduced by the percentage that they were to blame for the acciden... More... $1 (04-12-2024 - WV)
|
|
Tracie Keehley v. Vernon C. Stiner and Motor Carrier Service, LLC
|
|
Rochester, New York personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compensation for their injuries in proportion to the fault of others. Compensation is diminished by whatever percentage of fault is attributable to the injured party.
... More... $1 (04-12-2024 - )
|
Next Page
|