Portland, Oregon personal Injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a product liability theory.

Oregon's product liability laws require a plaintiff to be no more than 50 percent at fault to be awarded damages. If you think you have a products liability claim, it is very important to protect and preserve the product as much as possible, and prevent any avoidable deterioration or change in... More...   $1 (02-16-2024 - OR)

Fargo, North Dakota personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Morton County Court, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

North Dakota is a modified comparative negligence state It allocates fault to all parties involved, thus reducing how much each party can recover from the car a... More...   $1 (02-15-2024 - ND)

Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

North Carolina's strict rules on determining fault in car accidents are known as “pure contributory negligence” laws. This means that the victim has to be 100 percent free of fault for the accident in order to receive compensation. Unfortunately, this task can ... More...   $1 (02-15-2024 - NC)

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

n Pennsylvania, a plaintiff can recover compensation for a personal injury claim as long as the level of fault is not more than 50% of the total fault. An action to recover damages must be started within two years, and those damages can include medical bills, lost wages... More...   $1 (02-15-2024 - PA)

Charleston, South Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Some states subscribe to the “pure comparative negligence” rule, where a plaintiff can recover damages even if he or she was 99 percent at-fault. But South Carolina follows the “modified comparative negligence” rule, with a 51 percent bar. Here, the plain... More...   $1 (02-13-2024 - SC)

Rock Hill, South Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, 2023-CP-12-00086, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Some states subscribe to the “pure comparative negligence” rule, where a plaintiff can recover damages even if he or ... More...   $0 (02-13-2024 - SC)

Roanoke, Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Montgomery County Circuit Court, CL-22002004-00, and was removed to federal court by the Dfendant.

Some states follow a more enlightened version of the fault law called "comparative negligence." Alas, Virginia still chooses what is known ... More...   $1 (02-12-2024 - VA)

Brooklyn, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.


ORDER granting #9 Motion to Amend: The Stipulation to discontinue the action as to Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., without prejudice, and to substitute Domino's Pizza LLC in its place.
New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compen... More...   $0 (02-12-2024 - NY)

Sapulpa, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolved... More...   $0 (02-09-2024 - )

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to causing the accident in which you were injured, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

... More...   $1 (02-06-2024 - KS)

Omaha, Nebraska personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

In Nebraska, the right to compensation is based on the “51% rule.” A plaintiff can still recover partial compensation so long as their degree of fault is less than that of the defendant(s) in the case. The plaintiff's compensation will be reduced in proportion to their percentage o... More...   $1 (02-03-2024 - NE)

Columbus, Ohio personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Ohio negligence laws follow the modified comparative negligence approach which reduces damages in proportion to the claimant's degree of fault. However, if a claimant is found to be 51% or more at fault for their damages, they are barred from recovering anything.

... More...   $1 (02-02-2024 - OH)

El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a crash may recover compensation as long as they are not more at fault for the accident than the defendant. The accident victim's compensation is reduced based... More...   $0 (02-02-2024 - OK)

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on atuo negligence theories.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a crash may recover compensation as long as they are not more at fault for the accident than the defendant. The accident victim's compensation is reduced bas... More...   $1 (02-01-2024 - OK)

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a crash may recover compensation as long as they are not more at fault for the accident than the defendant. The accident victim's compensation is reduced based on their as... More...   $1 (02-01-2024 - OK)

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability law theory.

Globus Medical is a leading medical device manufacturer with the goal of improving the quality of life for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. We are inspired by the needs of these patients and by the surgeons and healthcare providers who treat them.
More...   $1 (01-30-2024 - UT)

Wheeling, West Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Under West Virginia's comparative negligence laws, an injury victim who is 50% or less at fault for an accident can recover compensation for their injuries. Their total amount of damages will then be reduced by the percentage that they were to blame for the accident.... More...   $1 (01-29-2024 - WV)

Providence, Rhode Island personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

"Rhode Island is a "fault" state, which means that the at-fault driver is responsible for the damages and injuries caused in a car accident. To determine liability, the following three factors are considered: 1. Negligence: Negligence refers to a person's failure to ... More...   $1 (01-29-2024 - RI)

Peoria, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damag... More...   $1 (01-29-2024 - IL)

Pierre, South Dakota personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

South Dakota has the “slight negligence” system in which the plaintiff may recover a proportionate fault share of his damages only so long as the trier of fact finds the plaintiff's negligence to be “slight” in comparison to the negligence of the ... More...   $0 (01-24-2024 - SD)

Cheyenne, Wyoming personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Wyoming does use modified comparative negligence statutes, which allow for shared fault. If you are less than 50 percent responsible, you can collect damages from the other driver (or, in most cases, their insurance company).... More...   $1 (01-24-2024 - WY)

East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Defendants who were sued on auto negligence theories.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damages.More...   $1 (01-24-2024 - IL)

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto
negligence theory.

This case was filed in the First Judicial District Court, D-101-cv-22-01660 and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Unlike many other states, New Mexico is a pure comparative negligence state. Under this legal theory, the amo... More...   $0 (01-23-2024 - NM)