Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendants on medical malpractice wrongful death negligence theory.

According to the Plaintiff claimed that Cynthia Lorraie Roach, a/k/a Cindi, died after undergoing a procedure at Defendants' Plastice Surgery Center in Tulsa on May 30, 2020 as a direct result of care that fell below the standard of care.

OKlahoma City, Personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

In Oklahoma, to prove that a healthcare provider was negligent, you must show three things: There was a provider-patient relationship. The provider violated the appropriate standard of care. This violation caused an injury and created damages.

Plainti

New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was initially filed in the Supreme Court County of Bronx, 800664/2023E, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compensation for their injuries in proportion to

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, meaning they can only hear cases authorized by the United States Constitution or federal statutes. The federal district court is the starting point for any case arising under federal statutes, the Constitution, or treaties.

Oklahoma

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on medical malpractice negligence theories.

Medical malpractice cases are basically complicated negligence cases that asserted that the healthcare provider provided substandard care that injured and/or damaged the Plaintiff patient.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available for

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory.

Plaintiff claimed that she was injured and/or damaged as a direct result of substandard medical care provided to her at a VA Clinic or Hospital.

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Williams Scotsman, Inc. operates as a space solutions. The Company provides solutions for instructional, living, health, office, storage and specialty including modular offices, and permanent modular structures.

Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is over 50% at fault for an accident, they give up their right to receive compensation for damages. Other states throughout the country have similar regulations in place regarding traffic accidents.

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on product liability wrongful death theories.

This case was filed in the Arapahoe County District Court, 2021CV30884, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

The theories of liability include breach of warranty, negligence

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Second Judicial District Court, D-202-CV-22-03419, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

The current diversity jurisdiction provision is codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and grants federal court jurisdiction in all ci

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the Second Judicial District Court, D-202-CV-22-03826, and was removed to federal court by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Premises Liability: When Property Owners are Liable for Your Injury in New Mexico. Like personal injury claims, premises liability cases are

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Eleventh Judicial District Court, D-1113-CV-22-00418, and was removed to federal court by Haryana Star, Inc. et al.

New Mexico follows the pure comparative negligence doctrine. This means that a victim may pursue compensation even if they w

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a medical malpractice theory claiming $10 million in damages.

Utah Code section 78B-3-412 mandates that the patient provides each health care provider with 90 days' notice of the intent to file a lawsuit before an injured patient is able to file a medical malpractice suit. This notice is required to include

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 3rd District, Salt Lake County, 220907, and was removed by Wright Tree Service.

Utah has a comparative negligence law in place that has a 50 percent fault bar. This means that if you are at least half at fault, you will not retain anything from

Hammond, Indiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Lake Circuit Court, 45C01-2308-CT-000881, and was removed to federal court by Loves Travel Stops and Country Stores Inc.

To win a slip and fall lawsuit in Indiana, the victim must prove that the property owner was negligent. This means s

Hammond, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Porter Superior Court 2, 64D02-2212-CT-010418, and was removed to federal court by C.R. England, Inc. et al.

Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover

Jackson, Mississippi personal injury trip and fall lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Hinds County Circuit Court, MS, 25CI1:22-cv-480, and was removed to federal court by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al.

Premises liability law states that property owners must keep visitors reasonably safe from harm. If t

Jackson, Mississippi personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, 23-00337 and was removed to federal courts by Ronnie B. King. Jr. and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.

Mississippi has a pure comparative negligence system. This means that you can still r

Houston, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 80th District Court of Harris County, TX, 22-13419, and was removed to federal court by Fedex.

Texas follows the modified comparative negligence rule, also known as the 51% Bar Rule. This means that if a plaintiff is found to be 50% or les

Austin, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 126th District Court, Travis County, Texas, D-1-GN-23-000156, and was removed to federal court by The Lane Construction Corporation.

Texas follows the modified comparative negligence rule, also known as the 51% Bar Rule. This means that if

Greensboro, North Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Guilford County Superior Court, 22cvs9361, and was removed to federal court by Costco.

Property owners are responsible for conducting proper premises upkeep and maintenance, limiting dangerous conditions, and/or warning visito

Las Cruces, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who used on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Fifth Judicial District Court, D-503-CV-23-00537, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

New Mexico is a pure comparative negligence state. That means that fault can be shared among drivers, with each driver being assigned a percen

Savannah, Georgia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the State Court of Chatham County, Georgia, STCV22-01806, and was removed to federal court by HHC TRS Savannah LLC.

Under the law in Georgia, a tort is an “unlawful violation of a private legal right,” and negligence is one of several types of torts.

Brooklyn, New York personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compensation for their injuries in proportion to the fault of others. Compensation is diminished by whatever percentage of fault is attributable to the injured party.