State ex rel Mel Stewart v. City of Salem |
This matter is before us for a second time. See State |
City of Emeryville v. Michael Cohen |
The factual and legal setting of this case is complex, involving the Legislature’s |
Adam Nick v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and 7-Eleven, Inc. |
In this original proceeding, petitioners Adam Nick and Sherry Nick |
Clifford Charles Tyler v. Hillsdale County Sheriff's Department |
This case presents an important issue of first impression in the federal courts: whether a prohibition on the possession of firearms by a person “who has been committed to a mental institution,” 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4), violates the Second Amendment. |
United States of America v. Howard O. Kieffer |
Defendant-Appellant Howard Kieffer has appealed from the district court’s |
Marilyn Van Horn v. Department of Toxic Substances Control |
In this appeal from a demurrer sustained without leave to amend on the ground of uncertainty, we reverse in part. We conclude that plaintiff Marilyn Van Horn has stated a cause of action, by alleging that the procedure used by defendant Department of Toxic |
Jose A. Duarte v. California State Teachers' Retirement System |
Jose A. Duarte (Duarte) appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of administrative mandamus, through which he asserts that his application to the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) for disability retirement benefits has been improperly denied. After hearing, an administrative law judge (ALJ) upheld CalSTRS’s denial of Duarte’s application for benef... More... $0 (12-18-2014 - CA) |
Ventura Foothill Neighbors v. County of Ventura |
As Oliver Wendell Holmes said: "Men must turn square corners when they deal with the Government." (Rock Island A. & L.R. Co. v. United States (1920) 254 U.S. 141, 143; 65 L.Ed. 188, 189.) Our own California Supreme Court remarked: " 'It is hard to see why the government should not be held to a like standard of rectangular rectitude when dealing with its citizens.' [Citation.]" (Farrell v. County o... More... $0 (12-15-2014 - CA) |
United States of America v. Jose Huco Cruanes |
On July 29, 1982, Jose Hugo Cruanes pled guilty to conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Case: 13-15057 Date Filed: 12/05/2014 Page: 1 of 6 |
Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters v. Terry Graham, Jr. |
Terry Graham, Jr., shot and killed would-be burglar, Hiram Joshua Chambers, at Graham’s ranch house in Smith County, Texas.1 In successfully defending the resulting wrongful death lawsuit by Chambers’ family members,2 Graham incurred $130,841.43 in defense costs, which Graham seeks to recover from Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters (Underwriters), the issuer of Graham’s Texas Farm and Ranch Owne... More... $0 (12-05-2014 - TX) |
The State of Texas v. Valerie Saxion, Inc. |
In two issues in this accelerated interlocutory appeal, Appellants the State of Texas and Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas (collectively, the State) argue that the trial court erred by denying their |
Marilyn Van Horn v. Department of Toxic Substances Control |
In this appeal from a demurrer sustained without leave to amend on the ground of uncertainty, we reverse in part. We conclude that plaintiff Marilyn Van Horn has stated a cause of action, by alleging that the procedure used by defendant Department of Toxic |
Jorge Guevara, M.D. v. Mark Lackner and Robert E. Lackner |
Appellant Jorge Guevara M.D. appeals the trial court’s no-evidence summary judgment granted in favor of appellees Mark Lackner and Robert E. Lackner on Dr. Guevara’s claims of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and conspiracy. By three issues, Dr. Guevara contends that the trial court erred in concluding that his evidence presented in response to the Lackners’ motion for no-evidence summary ju... More... $0 (11-13-2014 - TX) |
Susan E. Jones v. Karen Coyle |
Appellant Susan E. Jones appeals the probate court’s denial of a motion requesting that her attorneys’ fees be assessed against appellee Susan Coyle. Appellant asserts that it was error for the probate court not to award attorneys’ fees against the party who wrongfully withheld property of the estate. We affirm. |
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Matthew Howard |
In this case concerning a seaman’s entitlement to payments for maintenance and cure, his employer argues that the trial court erred in granting the seaman’s motion to compel such payments. We agree that the order is a temporary injunction and that it does not comply with Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 683. We therefore declare the order void, dissolve it, and remand the case to the trial |
Albert Thoas Paulek v. California Department of Water Resources |
Plaintiff and appellant Albert Thomas Paulek appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of mandate under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). He seeks a writ directing defendant and respondent California Department of Water Resources (Department) to vacate its approval of the final environmental impact report (EIR) with |
Oxbow Construction, LLC v. The Regent at Town Center Homeowners' Association |
In this opinion, we consider several issues raised by |
In Re: Joshua Hughes |
In August 2014, the Department of Family and Protective Services filed in Bowie |
In Re: Craig Watkins |
Craig Watkins, the elected District Attorney of Dallas County, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus1 in these pending capital murder cases arguing that the trial court improperly ordered a pretrial determination of whether the defendant is intellectually disabled.2 Because we |
Cassaundra Ellena v. Department of Insurance |
Cassaundra Ellena appeals from a judgment of dismissal of her mandamus claim against the Department of Insurance and the Commissioner of the Department of Insurance (the commissioner; collectively, the DOI). Ellena contends, among other things, that the trial court erred when it found that she did not sufficiently allege in her pleading that the DOI violated a specific mandatory duty. We conclude ... More... $0 (10-01-2014 - CA) |
Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of Tulsa |
¶1 The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether or not Taxpayer/appellant, J. Clark Bundren, M.D., (Taxpayer), must include bondholders as necessary parties to this lawsuit. We affirm the order of the trial court. |
Johnnie Boler v. Security Health Care, LLC d/b/a Grace Living Center |
¶1 The issue is whether the trial court erred in denying the nursing home's motion to compel arbitration. The trial judge held that the wrongful death claim belonging to Cleo Boler's statutory beneficiaries pursuant to 12 O.S. 2011 1053 is not subject to an agreement to arbitrate contained in he... More... $0 (09-30-2014 - OK) |
Jim L. Irving v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board |
The real party in interest, the Los Angeles Unified School District (the district), appeals from an order granting a mandate petition filed by plaintiff, Jim L. Irving. Defendant, the California Unemployment Appeals Board (the board), after an administrative hearing, refused to grant plaintiff unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Unemployment Insurance Code section 1256.1 The trial court... More... $0 (09-12-2014 - CA) |
State of Oklahoma v. Michelle Dawn Murphy |
Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma charged Michelle Dawn Murphy with first-degree murder in conjunction with the death of her 15-month-old son in 1994. Murphy was convicted by a Tulsa County jury in November of 1996 and was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. |
Amanda Nora Singh v. Will Lightbourne |
Amanda Norasingh—a young adult suffering from significant medical and mental |
Next Page |