State of Oklahoma v. Nicole Nichols | ||||||
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with assault and battery upon a police officer in violation of 21 o.s. 649, which provides: |
||||||
State of Oklahoma v. Ashley Rachelle Ramirez | ||||||
Enid, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with assault and battery on a medical care provider in violation of 21 O.S. 650.4, which provides: |
||||||
Danny Lamont Chambers; Dontell Rayvon-Eddie Smith v. Ronald Sanders; City of Detroit, Michigan | ||||||
Danny Lamont Chambers and Dontell Rayvon-Eddie Smith allege that Detective Ronald Sanders and his employer, the City of Detroit, violated their Fourteenth Amendment right to familial integrity by procuring the wrongful |
||||||
United States of America v. Jeffrey W. Young, Jr. | ||||||
Jackson, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and maintaining a drug involved premises. |
||||||
United States of America v. Emraan Ali | ||||||
Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiring to provide material support to ISIS. |
||||||
United States of America v. Faith Naccarato | ||||||
Kansas City, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with stealing fentanyl from two hospitals where she worked. |
||||||
United States of America v. Julio Alvarado | ||||||
New York, New York criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with leading a sprawling scheme to defraud Medicaid of millions of dollars through the billing of fraudulent transportation claims. |
||||||
Bob Dawson, et al. v. Porch.com, Inc., et al. | ||||||
Seattle, Washington consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theories. |
||||||
James Campbell v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center, et al. | ||||||
Charleston, Illinois plaintiff personal injury lawyer represented plaintiffs who sued Defendants on medical malpractice negligence theories claiming that Kiera Campbell suffered birth injuries as a direct result of substandard care provided to her mother during labor and delivery. |
||||||
United States of America v. Ze’Shawn Stanley Campbell | ||||||
Los Angles, California criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with fraud. |
||||||
Carl Ward v. NPAS, Inc. | ||||||
Nashville, Tennessee consumer credit lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Fair Debt Collection Practice Act violation theory. |
||||||
United States of America v. Dearborn Obstetrics and Gynecology, P.C. | ||||||
Detroit, Michigan civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant accused of violating the Americans With Disabilities Act by failing to provide sign language to a disabled patient. |
||||||
United States of America v. Arlington Ophthalmology Association, P.L.L.C. d/b/a Kleiman Evangelista Eye Centers (“K&E”) | ||||||
Sherman, Texas civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant accused of paying kickbacks to optometrists to induce referrals of patients who were candidates for cataract surgery in in violation of the False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Statute. |
||||||
United States of America v. Sady Ribeiro | ||||||
New York, New York criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with health care fraud. |
||||||
Jason De La Cruz v. Ability Recovery Services, LLC, et al. | ||||||
San Antonio, Texas consumer credit lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory. |
||||||
United States of America v. Dr. Oliver Jenkins and Sherry-Ann Jenkins | ||||||
Toledo, Ohio criminal defense lawyers represented Defendants charged with conspiracy, mail fraud, wire fraud, and health care fraud.
|