Mesothelioma Law
United States of America v. Roger Osterhoudt

Binghamton, New York criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with negligently releasing asbestos and thereby exposing victims to an increased risk of death or serious bodily injury.

Roger Osterhoudt, 58, of Saugerties, New York, was charged with a Clean Air Act violation.

"Operators of asbestos demolition and renovation projects are responsible for how this dangero... More...
   $0 (05-22-2021 - NY)

United States of America v. Stephanie Laskin and A2 Environmental Services (A2ES)

Albany, New York illegal removal of asbestos charge criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, Stephanie Laskin, 45, of Newburgh, along with several others, conspired to illegally remove asbestos from a former IBM site in Kingston, now known as TechCity in 2015 and 2016. The facility in question contained over 400,000 square feet of regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM), as well as an ... More...   $0 (04-09-2021 - NY)

United States of America v. Gunay Yakup

Syracuse, NY - Criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charge with conspiracy to illegally remove asbestos.

Gunay Yakup, 31, of Newburgh, joined an existing conspiracy to illegally remove asbestos from a former IBM site in Kingston. The facility in question contained over 400,000 square feet of regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM), as well as an additional 6,000 linear feet... More...
   $0 (03-27-2021 - NY)

Susan Jean Bader v. Avon Products, Inc.

In this strict products liability, negligence, and fraud case, plaintiff
Susan Jean Bader (Bader), the representative of the estate of Patricia
Schmitz (Schmitz), sues defendant Avon Products, Inc. (Avon) alleging that
Schmitz used Avon’s perfumed talc powder products for around 20 years, and
that these products contained asbestos and caused Schmitz’s mesothelioma.1
The trial c... More...
   $0 (10-01-2020 - CA)

Frank C. Hart v. Keenan Properties, Inc.

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today

After Frank Hart developed mesothelioma, he and his
wife, Cynthia, sued Keenan Properties... More...
   $0 (05-26-2020 - CA)

Evan C. Nelson v. Tucker Ellis, LLP

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today

This is an appeal from judgment on the pleadings entered by the trial
court in favor of d... More...
   $0 (05-06-2020 - CA)

Textron, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company

This insurance coverage dispute between Appellant Textron Inc.
(Textron) and respondent Travelers Casualty and Surety Company
(Travelers) raises the issue whether an earlier choice of law ruling in a
Rhode Island coverage action between the parties qualifies for collateral
and judicial estoppel effect, thus precluding Textron from seeking
coverage under California law in the cu... More...
   $0 (02-27-2020 - CA)


Need help finding a lawyer for representation concerning an asbestos case in Louisiana?

Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.

We review a trial court’s ruling on a motion to quash under an abuse of
discretion standard.2 The Relators’ argument that the trial subpoenas should be
quashed has three parts. Fi... More...
   $0 (01-27-2020 - LA)


Need help finding a lawyer for representation concerning appealing a dispute over the refund owed from unexpended
jury deposit costs in Louisiana?

Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.

On March 14, 2018, Mr. Rodrigue filed a petition for damages against
several defendants to recover damages allegedly in... More...
   $0 (01-26-2020 - LA)

Donna Olsson et aux. v. Johnson & Johnson

New York, NY - Donna Olson and her husband sued Johnson & Johnson on product liability theories claiming that she developed mesothelioma as a direct result of using Johnson's Baby Powder product, which she claimed contains asbestos.... More...   $325000000 (05-31-2019 - OK)

Beth-Anee F. Johnson v. Johnson & Johnson

Columbia, SC - Beth-Anee F. Johnson sued Johnson & Johnson on a product liability theory claiming that she developed mesothelioma as a direct result of using talc products sold to her by Defendant that contained asbestos. More...
   $25000000 (05-21-2019 - SC)

Michael B. Burch v. Certainteed Corporation

MoreLaw Virtual Receptionists

Never Miss Another New Client Call

Plaintiffs Michael and Cindy Burch sued defendant CertainTeed Corporation, an
asbestos-cement (A/C) pipe manuf... More...
   $0 (05-13-2019 - CA)

Bruce Betazner and Barbara Betzner v. The Boeing Compnay

MoreLaw Helps Lawyers Get New Clients

After Bruce and Barbara Betzner
named Boeing as a defendant in their state court personal injury... More...
   $0 (12-17-2018 - IL)

Bethany Modisette v. Apple, Inc.

Bethany and James Modisette, along with their daughter Isabella, sued Apple Inc.
after they were seriously injured, and their daughter Moriah was killed, when a driver
using the FaceTime application on his iPhone crashed into their car on a Texas highway.
The trial court sustained Apple’s demurrer to the Modisettes’ first amended complaint
and dismissed the action. The Modisettes a... More...
   $0 (12-16-2018 - CA)

James John Waite, Jr. v. AII Acquisitions Corporation, et al. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida - Miami, Florida Morelaw Internet Marketing National Find A Lawyer Directory 888-354-4529

While living in Massachusetts, James Waite was exposed repeatedly to asbestos, some of which was mined and sold by Union Carbide Corporation. More than twenty-five years after his initial asbestos exposure, Mr. Waite moved to Florida, where he was diagnosed with mesothelioma. Mr. Waite and his wife, Sandra Waite, filed a lawsuit in Florida state court against a group of defendants that included Un... More...   $0 (08-31-2018 - FL)

LAOSD Asbestos Cases - Delgadina Alfaro v. Colgate-Palmolive Company

This is the second appeal arising out of a lawsuit by
plaintiff Elizabeth Alfaro,1 in which she alleged that she
developed mesothelioma as a result of exposure to asbestos
contained in talcum powder products. Her claims for negligence
and strict product liability proceeded to trial against two
defendants, including appellant Colgate-Palmolive Company
(Colgate), a talcum pow... More...
   $0 (08-09-2018 - CA)

Stephen Lanzo, III, et aux v. Johnson & Johnson and Imergys

Newark, NJ - Stephen Lanzo, III, and wife sued Johnson & Johnson and Imergys on product liability theories claiming that M. Lanzo developed mesothelioma as a direct result of exposure to asbestos in Johnson & Johnson talcum powder supplied to it by Imerys.

Lanzo claied that he used talcum power for decades and that it contained asbestos.

Johnson & Johnson denied that its baby pow... More...
   $37000000 (04-08-2018 - NJ)

Michele Clark v. All Acquisition, L.L.C., et al. Southern District of New York - New York, New York

In 2015, John Edward Clark was diagnosed with mesothelioma,
a cancer caused by the inhalation of asbestos fibers. At that time, Mr.
Clark was nearing completion of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan that
he and his wife, Michele, had entered into in 2010. Although the
Clarks fulfilled their last remaining obligations under the plan within
a matter of weeks, their bankruptcy proceedin... More...
   $0 (04-02-2018 - NY)

Luis Gonzales v. John R. Mathis

Luis Gonzalez, a professional window washer, filed a
premises liability action against John Mathis. Mathis moved for
summary judgment, arguing that Gonzalez’s status as an
independent contractor precluded his claims. The trial court
granted the motion. We reverse, concluding there are triable
issues of fact whether Mathis can be held liable for Gonzalez’s
FACT... More...
   $0 (02-20-2018 - CA)

Keith Turley v. Familian Corporation Alameda County California Courthouse - Oakland, California

Plaintiffs husband and wife sued for asbestos-related injury against numerous
defendants, including defendant Familian Corporation. Familian moved for summary
judgment on the basis that plaintiffs could not show exposure to asbestos in a Familianrelated
product. Plaintiffs’ opposition included a declaration from a third party witness
who had not been deposed, who testified in detai... More...
   $0 (12-28-2017 - CA)

T.H., a Minor, etc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation California Supreme Court Building - Sacamento, California

Under California law, a brand-name drug manufacturer has a duty to warn
of known or reasonably knowable adverse effects arising from an individual’s use
of its drug. (See Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co. (1973) 9 Cal.3d 51, 65.) In this
case, we examine whether — and if so, under what circumstances — a brandname
drug manufacturer may be sued under a theory of “warning label” liability... More...
   $0 (12-25-2017 - CA)

Mary Lyons v. Colgate-Palmolive Company

Plaintiff Mary Lyons appeals from the summary judgment entered against her on
her product liability claim against Colgate-Palmolive Company (Colgate), based on the
allegation that she developed mesothelioma from the use of Colgate’s Cashmere Bouquet
cosmetic talcum powder. In granting the motion, the trial court failed to comply with
Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivisio... More...
   $0 (10-21-2017 - CA)

Latrice Rubenstein v. Doe No. 1

In 2012, plaintiff, Latrice Rubenstein, filed a claim with defendant Doe
No. 1 (defendant), a public entity, alleging that from 1993 to 1994, when she was
a high school student, her cross-country and track coach, who was defendant’s
employee, sexually molested her. When the claim was denied, she commenced
the instant action against defendant and defendants Does Nos. 2-20. She alleg... More...
   $0 (09-05-2017 - CA)

Howard Construction Company, Inc. v. Texas Association of Women's Clubs

Appellant Howard Construction Company, Inc. sued appellee Texas Association
of Women’s Clubs for reformation of a deed, declaratory relief, establishment of an
easement by necessity, and an accounting. It also alleged claims of slander of title and
tortious interference with prospective business relations. TAWC filed a counterclaim
alleging breach of contract and requestin... More...
   $0 (08-15-2017 - TX)

Kawika Demara v. The Raymond Corporation

In this products liability case, plaintiffs Kawika Demara (Demara) and Sandra
Demara (together, Plaintiffs) appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of
defendants The Raymond Corporation (Raymond) and Raymond Handling Solutions,
Inc. (RHSI) (together, Defendants). As relevant to this appeal, Plaintiffs asserted claims
for strict liability and negligence based on injuries Dem... More...
   $0 (07-23-2017 - CA)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer


Find a Case