Monopoly Law

Dayton, OH - Criminal defense attorney represented Byron R. Hemming with a sexual imposition charge.

{¶ 2} The State’s evidence at trial established the following facts.

{¶ 3} A.H. and her boyfriend, Sebastian Osborne, met when they were both
serving in the United States Army, and they began dating around t... More...
   $0 (03-27-2021 - OH)

Genius Media Group, Inc. et al v. Alphabet Inc., et al

San Francisco, California Genius Media Group, Inc. sued Alphabet, Inc. on an anti-trust theory claiming Google had monopoly power over the bidding process for online ads.... More...   $0 (12-20-2020 - CA)

United States of America v. Indivior Solutions

Abingdon, Virginia white collar criminal defense lawyers represented making false statement regarding the marketing of the opioid-addiction-treatment drug Suboxone.

Indivior agreed to $600 million to resolve its civil and criminal liability. Altogether, the investigation and prosecution of Indivior Solutions and its parent companies, Indivior Inc. and Indivior plc, and two former Indivio... More...
   $0 (11-24-2020 - VA)

United States of America v. Google, LLC

Washington, DC - The United States of America sued Google on an anti-trust violation theory claiming that it is unlawfully maintaining monopolies through anticompetitive and exclusionary practices in the search and search advertising markets and to remedy the competitive harms. The participating state Attorneys General offices represent Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mi... More...   $0 (10-20-2020 - DC)

United States of America v. Reckitt Benckiser Group, P.L.C. (RB Group)

Abington, VA - Justice Department Obtains $1.4 Billion from Reckitt Benckiser Group in Largest Recovery in a Case Concerning an Opioid Drug in United States History

Global consumer goods conglomerate... More...
   $1400000000 (07-11-2019 - VA)

Apple Inc. v. Robert Pepper

In 2007, Apple started selling iPhones. The next year, Apple launched the retail App Store, an electronic store where iPhone owners can purchase iPhone applicationsfrom Apple. Those apps enable iPhone owners to sendmessages, take photos, watch videos, buy clothes, order food, arrang... More...
   $0 (05-14-2019 - DC)

United States of America v. Oladimeji Seun Ayelotan

Three Africa-based cybercriminalsOladimeji Ayelotan, Femi Mewase, and Rasaq Raheemmasterminded a sprawling international romance scam that stole hearts, and money. Posing as bachelors (and bachelorettes) online, these Nigerian nationals kindled digital romances with scores of lovelo... More...
   $0 (03-05-2019 - MS)

Federal Trade Commission v. Shire Viropharma, Inc.

Shire ViroPharma, Inc. (Shire),1 manufactured and marketed the lucrative drug Vancocin, which is indicated to treat a life-threatening gastrointestinal infection. After Shire got wind that manufacturers were considering making generic equivalents to Vancocin, it inundated the Unit... More...
   $0 (02-26-2019 - DE) B.V. v. The United States Patent and Trademark Office

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (the USPTO) and ( both appeal the district courts summary judgment ruling regarding the protectability of the proposed trademark BOOKING.COM.1 The USPTO appeals on the ground that the district court erred in con... More...
   $0 (02-04-2019 - VA)

Gary W. Richards v. Direct Energy Services, LLC

Plaintiff‐Appellant Gary W. Richards (Richards) entered into an
electr... More...
   $0 (02-04-2019 - CT)

Walid Jammal v. American Family Insurance Company

In this class action, the named plaintiffs represent several thousand current and former insurance agents for American Family Insurance Company and its affiliates (collectively, American Family or the company). The agents claim that American Family misclassified them as independen... More...
   $0 (01-30-2019 - OH)

Jason Ditzian v. Steve Unger

In June 2016, respondents filed suit against appellant, seeking to establish a
prescriptive easement allowing them to cross appellants parcel on a path leading to
MacKerricher State Park. Respondents complaint alleged that in October 2015 appellant

1 All undesignated stat... More...
   $0 (01-25-2019 - CA)

Teamsters Local 404 v. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Inc.,andPfi... More...   $0 (10-24-2018 - NY)

Teamsters Union v. Warner Chilcott Limited

MoreLaw Performance Marketing

If It Does Not Work, It Is Free!

<... More...
   $0 (10-17-2018 - MA)

Marco Antonio Atempa v. Paolo Pedrazzani

Labor Code section 558,1 subdivision (a) provides that an employer "or other
person acting on behalf of an employer" who violates or causes a violation of the state's
applicable overtime laws shall be subject to a civil penalty. Similarly, section 1197.1,
subdivision (a) provides that an employer "or other person acting either individually or as
an officer, agent, or employee of an... More...
   $0 (10-02-2018 - )

State of Iowa v. Imere Hall

Hall testified at his trial. There, he told the jury the following transpired the
night Collin Brown was murdered.
In the lat... More...
   $0 (09-26-2018 - IA)

In the Matter of the Equalization Appeal of KANSAS STAR CASINO, L.L.C. for the Year 2015

Kansas Star is one of four state-sponsored gaming enterprises in Kansas authorized under K.S.A. 74-8733 et seq., the Kansas Expanded Lottery Act (KELA), and is located in the south central gaming zone. In 2007 the Legislature passed KELA which divided the state into four gaming zonesnortheast, south central, southwest, and southeastand authorized the Kansas Lottery to operate a single gaming fac... More...   $0 (07-22-2018 - KS)


In August of 2016, a number of local businesses in Shelby County
reported to the police that they had received counterfeit bills. Doc. 154 at 196. On
August 13, 2016, Barga contacted the police and informed them that a passenger in
his carTrisa Engle (Engle)was in possession of illegal contraband. Id. at 230.
During this call, Barga and the police arranged for a stin... More...
   $0 (07-18-2018 - OH)


The pharmaceutical company Boehringer claimed attorney-client privilege over certain documents subpoenaed by the Federal Trade Commission. The attorney-client privilege applies to a communication between attorney and client if at least one of the significant purposes of the communication was to obtain or provide legal advice. In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 758 (D.C. Cir. 2014)... More...   $0 (06-21-2018 - DC)

In the Matter of the Equalization Appeal of KANSAS STAR CASINO, L.L.C. for the Year 2013 in Sumner County, Kansas

As this court explained in detail in In re Equalization Appeal of Kansas Star Casino, 52 Kan. App. 2d 50, 52-55, 362 P.3d 1109 (2015), rev. denied 307 Kan. ___ (December 20, 2017), Kansas Star is one of four state-sponsored gaming enterprises in Kansas and is located in the south central gaming zone. In April 2007 the Kansas Legislature enacted K.S.A. 74-8733 et seq., the Kansas Expanded Lottery A... More...   $0 (06-12-2018 - KS)

Kimmy McNair and Larry McNair v. Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. Morelaw Internet Marketing for Legal Professionals We Turn Your Successes Into Marketing Call Today! 888-354-4529

This matter is before this Court upon a June 9, 2017, order of the United
States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit certifying the following question:
Whether West Virginia law permits a claim of failure to warn and negligent misrepresentation against a branded drug manufacturer when the drug ingested was produced by a generic manufacturer.
By order dated August 30, 2017, this Cou... More...
   $0 (05-11-2018 - WV)

Association for Accessible Medicines v. Brian E. Frosh, et al. District of Maryland Federal Courthouse - Baltimore, Maryland

The Association for Accessible Medicines (AAM) appeals the district courts dismissal of its dormant commerce clause challenge to a Maryland statute prohibiting price gouging in the sale of prescription drugs. AAM also appeals the district courts refusal to enjoin enforcement of the statute on the basis that it is unconstitutionally vague. We hold that the statute violates the dormant commerce ... More...   $0 (04-13-2018 - MD)

Philadelphia Taxi Association, Inc., et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. Eastern District of Pennsylvania Federal Courthouse - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Philadelphia taxicab drivers, aggrieved by the influx of
taxis hailed at the touch of an app on ones phone, brought
this antitrust action to protest the entry of Appellee Uber
Technologies, Inc. (Uber) into the Philadelphia taxicab
market. The Philadelphia Taxi Association (PTA), along
with 80 individual taxicab companies (collectively,
Appellants), appeal the ... More...
   $0 (04-13-2018 - PA)

Pharrell Williams v. Frankie Christian Gaye Central District of California Federal Courthouse - Los Angeles, California

After a seven-day trial and two days of deliberation, a jury found that Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke, and Clifford Harris, Jr.s song Blurred Lines, the worlds best-selling single in 2013, infringed Frankie Christian Gaye, Nona Marvisa Gaye, and Marvin Gaye IIIs copyright in Marvin Gayes 1977 hit song Got To Give It Up. Three consolidated appeals followed.

Appellants and Cross-A... More...
   $0 (03-29-2018 - CA)

Pieter A. Folkens v. Wyland Worldwide, LLC Eastern District of California Federal Courthouse - Sacramento, California

Plaintiff Peter A. Folkens (Folkens) alleges that Defendant Robert T. Wyland (Wyland) infringed on his pen and ink depiction of two dolphins crossing underwater. Folkens contends that Wylands depiction of an underwater scene infringes on his drawing by copying the crossing dolphins, and that the similar element of two dolphins crossing underwater is protectable under copyright law, entitling ... More...   $0 (02-19-2018 - AZ)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer


Find a Case