Concord, New Hampshire criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1956(h).
(1) Whoever, knowing that the property involved in a financial transaction represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, conducts or attempts to conduct such a financial transaction which in fact involves the procee... More...   $0 (07-08-2024 - NH)

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with three counts of aggravated sexual abuse by force and threat in Indian Country in violation of 18 USC §1151, 1153 and 2241(c).

18 U.S. Code § 1151 provides:

Except as otherwise provided in sections 1154 and 1156 of this title, the term “Indian country”, as used in this chapter, means (a) all land ... More...   $0 (05-15-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault with a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm in Indian County in violation of 18 USC 1151, 1153, and 113(a)(3), which provide:

Except as otherwise provided in sections 1154 and 1156 of this title, the term “Indian country”, as used in this chapter, means (a) all land within the limits of a... More...   $0 (04-17-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with:

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: ABOFF, PRISONER PLACING BODILY FLUIDS ON GOVERMENT EMPLOYEE, in violation of 21 O.S. 650.9
Date of Offense: 04/23/2023
Estrada, Anthony Louis
Disposed: DEFERRED, 04/15/2024. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: PRISONER PLACING BODILY FLUIDS ON GOVERMENT EMPLOYEE(ABOFF... More...   $0 (04-15-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant was was charged with first-degree murder.



18:1151, 1153, and 1111 - Murder-First Degree in Indian Country
(1)
18 USC 1151, 1153, and 1111: Murder in the Second Degree in Indian Country
(1s)

18 U.S. Code § 1151 - Indian country defined

Except as otherwise provided in sections 115... More...   $0 (04-11-2024 - OK)

¶1 Appellant, Dakoda Aaron McCauley, was tried and convicted by a jury in the District Court of Osage County, Case No. CF-2018-135, of Manslaughter in the First Degree (Heat of Passion), in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 711.1 The jury sentenced McCauley to twenty-two years imprisonment. The Honorable Burl O. Estes, Associate District Judge, presided at trial and pronounced judgment and sentence in... More...   $0 (04-04-2024 - OK)

Chicago, Illinois intellectual property law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a copyright infringement theory.

(a) Anyone who violates any of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner as provided by sections 106 through 122 or of the author as provided in section 106A(a), or who imports copies or phonorecords into the United States in violation of section 602, is an infringer... More...   $0 (02-26-2024 - IL)

Chicago, Illinois intellectual property law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114 violation theory.

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant— (a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution,... More...   $0 (02-22-2024 - IL)

Portland, Oregon intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under the Landham Act.

"The Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq., was enacted by Congress in 1946. The Act provides for a national system of trademark registration and protects the owner of a federally registered mark against the use of similar marks if su... More...   $0 (02-16-2024 - OR)

Los Angeles, California intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendants in a copyright infringement dispute.

Plaintiff claimed that Defendant violation a copyright that he owned of a photograph that he took of Miles Davis when placing a tattoo on the arm of a friend by the former star of the reality shows “Miami Ink” and “LA Ink” was not similar enough to photo... More...   $0 (01-26-2024 - CA)

Los Angeles, California intellectual property law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory 17 U.S.C. 501, which provides:

(a) Anyone who violates any of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner as provided by sections 106 through 122 or of the author as provided in section 106A(a), or who imports copies or phonorecords into the United ... More...   $6300000 (12-19-2023 - CA)

Eugene, Oregon intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a 15 U.S.C. 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) violation theory.

15 U.S.C. 1125 provides:

(1) Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any... More...   $0 (12-10-2023 - OR)

Tenton, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"New Jersey auto negligence law follows a comparative negligence system, meaning that both parties involved in an accident can be partly responsible for the damages. Here are some key points to understand:

Duty of Care:

Every driver has... More...   $0 (12-08-2023 - NJ)