Lubbock, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

CONSPIRACY TO TRANSPORT AN UNDOCUMENTED ALIEN WITHIN THE UNITED STATES

* * *

8 U.S.C. § 1324, also known as the "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" law, is a federal statute that criminalizes various activities related to the entry and presence of unauthorized immigrants in the United

Lubbock, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with transportation of illegal aliens.

8 U.S.C. § 1324, also known as the "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" law, is a federal statute that criminalizes various activities related to the entry and presence of unauthorized immigrants in the United States. It prohibits actions like smuggling, transporting, con

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation claim.

In the spring of 2021, Plaintiff Kurt Alexander (“Alexander”) worked as a law enforcement officer for Federal Protective Services (“FPS”), an arm of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), and lived in private military housing at Joint Base Andrews in Mar

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence case.

At a CVS Pharmacy in 2017, Amanda Watts was given two shots, one with the Pneumovax 23 vaccine and one with the Boostrix vaccine. According to Watts, both vaccines were negligently administered, in the same improper location in her arm. Watts was eventually diagnosed with a chronic pain condition th

Rochester, New York personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Railway Federal Employer's Liability Act negligence theory.

* * *

The Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) is a US federal law that provides compensation to railroad employees injured on the job due to their employer's negligence. Unlike typical workers' compensation, which is a n

Wichita, Kansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a Federal Employer's Liability Act (FELA) theory.

* * *

The Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA) is a US federal law that allows railroad workers to sue their employers for injuries sustained due to negligence or unsafe working conditions. Unlike typical workers' compensation, FELA requires employee

Wichita, Kansas insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence insurance claim.

Kansas follows a modified comparative negligence system in auto accident cases. This means that if a driver is partially at fault for an accident, they can still recover damages, but their compensation will be reduced by their percentage of fault. However, if a driver is 50% or more at f

Concord, New Hampshire personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence claim.

. This case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred at 4:30 p.m. on September 27, 2015 at the intersection of Route 106 and Staniels Road in Loudon (intersection). Plaintiff Tamre McCrae was traveling south on Route 106 when, while attempting to make a left turn onto Staniels Road, he

Las Cruces, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an negligence theory.

* * *

New Mexico operates under a "fault-based" or "tort" system for personal injury cases, meaning the person or entity responsible for causing the accident is liable for damages. New Mexico also employs a pure comparative negligence rule, meaning a plaintiff's damages can

Holdenville, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on breach of contract and tort theories.

On July 19, 2017, Diamond Homes, through Mike Emery, provided the Proes with an estimate for the construction of a home. [1] The estimate was provided on a form titled "DIAMOND HOMES COST ESTIMATE." Bart Patterson testified that the estimate was left in

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a malicious prosecution theory.

The parties do not dispute that in both Colorado and California, a claim for malicious prosecution requires the plaintiff to establish that the previous action, which was allegedly prosecuted maliciously (here the suit against Wyles by West Hills), ended in his favor. See Hewitt v. Rice, 1

Rapid City, South Dakota criminal defense lawyer represnted the Defendant charged with carjacking amd bramdosjomg a foredar, during a crime of violence.

* * *

Federal robbery and aiding and abetting laws, as defined under 18 U.S.C. § 2, hold individuals liable for the crimes of others if they assist in or encourage the commission of a federal offense. Essentially, anyone who aid

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on a premises liability negligence theory.

* * *

In Indiana, premises liability law holds property owners responsible for injuries occurring on their property due to unsafe conditions, provided the owner was negligent in maintaining the premises or failed to warn visitors of known hazards. To establish liabi

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on excessive force civil rights violation theores.

Officer Russell shot Delany when Delany drove away during a traffic stop.


"The shooting happened in March 2020, when Officer Aaron Russell responded to a call about a suspicious vehicle with a man inside at 28th and Pittsburg in Tulsa.

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a produce liability theory.

Eleven employees of American Airlines filed a class action complaint on behalf of themselves and thousands of fellow employees alleging that the new uniforms manufactured by Twin Hill Acquisition Co., Inc. had caused a wide variety of health problems. According to the complaint, the

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on civil rights violation theory.

Jesus Zambrano was convicted of
first-degree murder in an Illinois state court in August 2013,
but on appeal the Illinois Appellate Court agreed that the trial
court erred in failing to give a jury instruction on accomplice
liability. A second trial ensued in which

Detroit, Michigan personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theories.

Luis Martinez Jr. died in February 2021 and the Wayne County Medical Examiner’s Office (WCMEO) took control of his body. The WCMEO found his next of kin but inexplicably did not contact them. Meanwhile, the family hired a social worker to find out what happened to Luis Jr.

Bay City, Michigan personal injury lawyers presented the Plaintiff who sued on civil rights violation theories claiming hey own fourteen firearmsseized in a criminal investigation that ended years ago.

Sheriff William Federspiel refused to turn the firearms over to Novak and Wenzel because he contends they have not proven that they own them. So they sued Federspiel under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence case.

* * *

In Oklahoma, truck accident claims are governed by fault-based rules with a modified comparative negligence standard. This means the party responsible for causing the accident is liable for damages, but if the injured party is also at fault, their compensation can be r

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud

* * *

8 U.S.C. § 1349, titled "Attempt and Conspiracy," makes it a federal crime to attempt or conspire to commit any offense under Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which includes wire fraud. This means that even if a wire fraud scheme is not fully s

Florence, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability negligence theory.

* * *

In South Carolina, premises liability law holds property owners accountable for injuries that occur on their property due to unsafe conditions. This means if a person gets hurt because a property owner was negligent in maintaining a safe environment, the own

Charleston, South Carolina persnal injury lawyer reprsented the Plaintiff on a premises liability law theory.

this case was filed in the Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, 2024CP1002190, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

In South Carolina, premises liability law holds property owners and occupiers responsible for injuries sustained by visitors due to unsaf

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability negligence theory.

1. That Plaintiff, CYNTHIA BRADLEY (hereafter referred to as "CB"), is and was a r~deilt
of the City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma at all material times hereto.
2. That Defendant, DOLGENCORP, LLC, doing business as DOLLAR GENERAL, is and was
a foreign limited

Cheyenne, Wyoming personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a governmental tort claimed negligence claim.

On November 5, 2021, a Cheyenne City Transit bus driven by Edward Brookman hit Mr. Bain, who was driving his motorcycle. Mr. Bain suffered extensive and permanent injuries as a result of the collision. On September 25, 2023, Mr. Bain submitted a governmental

Tampa, Florida consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory in the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Sarasota County Court, 2025 SC 003458, which was removed to federal county by the Defendant.

* * *

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law that aims to eliminate abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt colle