Lufkin, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on negligence theories claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages in an accident in a Texas Roadhouse accident.

Beaumont, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered $625,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by a United States Postal Service employee.

28 U.S.C. 2671, et seq. provide:



The head o

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on negligence theories claiming more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

Lake Charles, Louisiana insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming that Scottsdale Insurance Company failed to adequately pay him for the damages that his business suffered as a direct result of Hurrican Laura.

San Antonio, Texas personal injury slip and fall claim lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's restaurants.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially

Midland, Texas personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Juan Aurelio Garcia while driving for Millennial Transport Services, Inc.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case

Fort Worth, Texas personal injury flip and fall lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in Dollar General Store #3250.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the 29th District Cour

Lubbock, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $9.99 million in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a truck accident caused by Gibson while driving for Nine Line.

Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. 1983 claiming to have been injured and/or damages as a direct result of the wrongful use of excessive force by Dalla Police Department officer.

Ois Davis, et al. claimed that Sgt. Matthew Davis wrongfully shot and killed Bertrand Davis, who was mentally ill, during

Statesville, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by one of Defendant's employees.

Greensboro, North Carolina personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of the failure on the part of the Defendant's employees to exercise due care.

Raleigh, North Carolina personal injury premises liability lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's restaurants.

Raleigh, North Carolina personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued The United States of American on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damages as a direct result of an motor vehicle accident caused by a federal government employee.

Greenbelt, Maryland personal injury premises liability lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Circuit Court of Maryland for Prince Geo

Greenbelt, Maryland personal injury premises liability lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Circuit Court for St. Mary's County, C-1

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theory
claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an truck accident caused by Mesinger.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Circuit Court fo

Alexandria, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory
claiming to have suffered more than $600,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Alexandria Circuit Court, CL20-2779, and was removed

Alexandria, Virginia personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued the United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damages as a direct result of the negligence operation of a motor vehicle by a federal government employee.

Danville, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $350,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Danville City Circuit Court, CL21-071, an

Abingdon, Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $550,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Tazewell County Circuit Court, CL20-2129,

Clarksburg, West Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence wrongful death theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by one of Defendant's employees.


The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was

Wheeling, West Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Vehapi and Spears.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Circuit C

Charleston, West Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Siem.

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a truck accident caused by Timmons.

This case was initially filed in the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 19-12034, and was removed to federal court by the Defend