Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of substandard care.

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Employer's Liability (FELA) Act theory claiming to have suffered more than $9,999,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident while working on the BNSF railroad.

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury trucks wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Allen.

This case was initially filed in the Ponotoc County District Court, CJ-21-00017, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

Wichita, Kansas personal injury attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a federal tort claims act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

Wichita, Kansas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury wrongful death lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $5 million in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

Cheyenne, Wyoming personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on auto negligence negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident cased by Domingue.

Denver, Colorado personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Dalton McManus.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

Las Vegas, Nevada insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance conract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result Defendant refusing to pay Plaintiff's claim.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

Madison, Wisconsin personal injury attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably danger product manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

"Cook Medical is a

Madison, Wisconsin insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case at this time

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a slip and fall premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in Defendant's store.

Tulsa, Oklahoma insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case at this time

This case was initially filed in the Tulsa County Dis

Reno, Nevada insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

Las Vegas, Nevada insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, A-19-790914-C, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Butte, Montana personal injury attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a defective and unreasonably dangerous produce manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.

Great Falls, Montana personal injury attorney represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on federal tort claims act medical malpractice negligence theories claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of of the death of Johnny G. Gibson who died as a direct result of substandard care.

Billings, Montana personal injury attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a federal tort claims act medical malpractice negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of the death of Earlajah Raye Miller as a direct result of substandard medical care.

Butte, Montana personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued defendants on premises liability negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

Billings, Montana personal injury attorneys represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant's employees.

Great Falls, Montana personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act product liability theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product provided to him by Defendant.