Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employee.

Muskogee, Oklahoma insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result.

Miami, Florida qui tam lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued the Defendant on a Tam False Claims Act violation theory under 31 U.S.C. 3730 theory.

The False Claims Act provides in part as follows:

§3730. Civil actions for false claims

(a) Responsibilities of the Attorney General.—The Attorney General diligently shall investigate a violation under section 3729. If

Memphis, Tennessee personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Steven Smith while driving a semi for Heartland.

07/01/2021 66 MOTION in Limine to exclude testimony and opinions of Santo Stephen Bifulco as to C

West Palm Beach, Florida personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defendant and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.

Fort Lauderdale, Florida personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability theory claiming have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous produce manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.

Fort Lauderdale, Florida personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on product liability theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous produce manufactured and/or sold by the Defendants.

Miami, Florida personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a medical malpractice theory claiming more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Miami, Florida personal injury premises liability lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries in an accident in a Home Depot store caused by Defendant's employees.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the 11th Judicial

West Palm Beach, Florida personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant, who claimed more than $75,000 claiming more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages was a direct result.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

Robin Schafler, as Personal Representative of the Estate of RHODA BELL, filed suit in the 15th Judicial Circuit Cou

Fort Lauderdale, Florida personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages a d/or injuries.

Miami, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages in a motor vehicle accident caused by the failure to exercise due care in the operation of the vehicle by one of Defendant's employees.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this

West Palm Beach, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by one of Defendant's employees.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially

West Palm Beach, Florida insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court Palm Beach, 2021-CA-005626, and was removed to fe

Oakland, California personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of an in store accident caused by the Defendant's employees.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the San Mateo Count

San Francisco, California personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a general negligence theoriy claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a negligent act, error or omission on the part of one or more of Defendant's employees.

Oakland, California personal injury car wreck attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Jajuan Lee Morton.

San Francisco. California personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on assault, libel and/or battery theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a wrongful, act, error or omission by a Walmart employee.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially fil

San Francisco, California personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, sued Defendant on a products liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.

Oakland, California insurance law attorney represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance company contract claiming more than $75,000 in damages.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Sonoma County Superior Court, SCV-268066, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

San Jose, California insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract claiming $100,000 in damages.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a unreasonably dangerous and defective product manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury attorneys represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.

"C. R. Bard, Inc., now branded as Bard, headquartered in Murray Hill, New Jersey, USA, wa

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury attorney represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on dental negligence malpractice theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of substandard care.