Alexandria, Virginia qui tam whistle blower lawyer represent Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a False Claims Act violation theory under 31 U.S.C. 3729, which provides:

(a) Liability for Certain Acts.—
(1) In general.—Subject to paragraph (2), any person who—
(A) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval;
(B) knowi

Richmond, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and sold by Defendant.

"Alliance Outdoor Group is a leader in the outdoor sporting industry. AOG owns several distinct brand

Norfolk, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on assault, libel and slander theories theory claiming to have suffered more than $750,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s wrongful, acts, errors and omissions.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was

Richmond, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming that he suffered more than $75,000 and injuries and/or damages caused by a defective and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and sold by Defendant.

Defendant designs, manufactures and sells a wide variety of electrical and electronic devices.

Norfolk, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result a defective and unreasonably dangerous product.

"Axon Enterprise, Inc. is an American Scottsdale, Arizona-based company which develops technology and weapons products for military, law en

Richmond, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Not

Alexandria, Virginai personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant's employees.

Alexandria, Virginian personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendants.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Loudoun County Circuit Court, CL2

Richmond, Virginai personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the City of Richmond Circuit Court, CL21

Richmond, Virginia insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on seeking a declaratory judgment on the issue of liability of Defendants on the insurance policy sold to Plaintiff claiming more than $75,000 in damages.

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theories claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct of wrongful acts, errors and omissions on the part of the FBI's failure to act on tips about the gunman who killed 17 people and wounded 17 more at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14

Minneapolis, Minnesota consumer credit lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory claiming $1,000 in damages.

Fargo, North Dakota insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming more than $75,000 in damages.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Cass County District Court, 09-02019-CV-00196 USCA8, 20-02521, and was removed to federal court by the Defend

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983 claiming $6 million in damages.

Carol Bunker sued as Trustee for the next-of-kin of Stephanie Rose Bunker.

Defendant Barb Fitzgerald was sued acting in her individual capacity as a Beltrami County correctional officer.

The claims

Minneapolis, Minnesota civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant claiming that Defendant violated Plaintiff Constitutionally protected rights causing $50,000 in damages.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights violation theory claiming to have suffered more than $500,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the violation of his civil rights by Patrick Kelly.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Employer's Liability Act (FELA) negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result a defective and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and sold by Defendant.

"Best of the West Productions is the pioneer in long range hunting with their Huskemaw brand, custo

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liabilty negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a car wreck caused by Rutar's failure to exercise due care.

Scranton, Pennsylvania insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of contract theory claiming $300,000 in damages.

Scranton, Pennsylvania insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages.