Amy Gustafson v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company |
Oklahoma City, OK: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. $1 (09-01-2021 - OK) |
Luther Monroe Woodcock and Lillian Woocock v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company |
Oklahoma City, OK: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. |
Ronnie Van Baugh, Jr. v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company |
Oklahoma City, OK: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. $1 (09-27-2021 - OK) |
Rachel Nicole Capps v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
Oklahoma City, OK: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. $0 (09-20-2021 - OK) |
William H. Wagner and Darlene Wagner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company |
Tulsa, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees. |
Lucienda Jack v. Dolgencorp, LLC |
Tulsa, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees. |
Karen Urban v. Markus Schafer |
Tulsa, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees. |
Teresa Ravenscroft and Deborah Ravenscroft v. CSA Travel Protection and Insurance Services |
Tulsa, OK: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. $0 (09-03-2021 - OK) |
Shandal Littleton v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. |
Tulsa, OK: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim. |
LINDA SISTO v. United States of America |
|
Demiah Joyce Torix and Austin L. Torix v. United States of America |
Muskogee, OK: Personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s doctor. $1 (06-14-2021 - OK) |
Heather R. Brillo v. United States of America |
Muskogee, OK: Personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s doctor. $1 (09-13-2021 - OK) |
Lynda Haskett v. Farmers New World Life Insurance Company |
Muskogee, OK: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of the breach. |
Cheryl Denham v. James B. Deck |
Tulsa, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile. |
Christopher Chapman v. Brennis O'Neal |
Tulsa, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile. |
Sandra Lada v. Anesa Couch |
Tulsa, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Couch's failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile. |
Clarence Scott v. Darlene Morgan |
Tulsa, OK: Plaintiff, acting pro se, sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile. |
Sharon Blackwood v. Alan William Schmidt |
Claremore, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile. |
Lyndi Wright v. Roadhawk Transportation, Inc. and Haldi Ibrahim Othman |
Oklahoma City, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, individually and as parent and next friend of C.W., a minor, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile. |
Kyle Moore v. John R. Grauberger, Jr. and Smith Roberts Baldischwiller, LLC |
Oklahoma City, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, individually and as parent and next of kin to C.M., a minor, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile. |
Nick Shaffer and Charla Shaffer v. Samual L. Pce, Cheeka Rogers, A&D Brown Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Brown's Driving School, and George A. Voss |
Oklahoma City, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant individually and as the parents and next friend of Hope Shaffer, deceased, on a wrongful death auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile by Voss. |
Lisa Dawn Craig v. James Willis Castillo and Magic Services, Inc. |
Oklahoma City, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile. |
Michael Reeves v. Aundrea Marie Koshiway |
Oklahoma City, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care in the operation of an automobile. |
Perla Melendez v. Carlos Adrian Egas, M.D. |
Oklahoma City, OK: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on medical malpractice theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendants failure to exercise due care and by providing substandard medical care. |
Marcus Byrd v. Emmanuel Arsenault and Seafood Express (PEI) Ltd |
New Haven, CT: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence and respondeat superior theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of truck wreck caused by Arsenault. $1 (09-09-2021 - CT) |
Next Page |