New Haven, CT: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence and respondeat superior theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of truck wreck caused by Arsenault.

New Haven, CT: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence and respondeat superior theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

New Haven, CT: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

Providence, RI: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

Providence, RI: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

This case was initially filed in the Superior Court - Providence County, PC-19-01261, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Providence, RI: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendants.

Bangor, ME: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant.

Concord, NH: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a non-motor vehicle tort theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of Defendant's acts, errors and/or omissions.

This case was initially filed in the Rockingham County Superior Court, 218-2019-CV-0039 , and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Concord, NH: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

Concord, NH: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

Fort Lauderdale, FL: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, F, CACE-20-010129, and was removed to federal court by the Defen

Tampa, FL: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $120,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Pinellas County Circuit Court, 21-002796-CI, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Panama County, FL: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit for Bay County, FL, 19000253CA, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Brunswick, GA: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Superior Court of Glynn County, Georgia, CE19-00420, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Columbus, GA: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

Gainesville, GA: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

Mobile, AL: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

Opelika, AL: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Circuit Court of Russell County, AL, 57-CV-20-900103.00, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Birmingham, AL: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, 20-903535, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Pocatello, ID: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Bannock County District Court, CV03-19-03319, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Yakima County Superior Court, 21-00002-00024-39, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Tacoma, WA: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.


This case was initially filed in the Pierce County Superior Court, 21-00002-06422-3, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Portland, OR: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $2 million as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Multnomah County Circuit Court, 19CV42752
9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 20-35822, and was removed to federa

Sacramento, CA: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

San Francisco, CA: Insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contra
ct theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

This case was initially filed in the Alameda Superior Court, HG17884807, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.