Anniston, Alabama personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on an auto negligence theory.

After any type of accident, you can bring a personal injury lawsuit against the party you believe to be responsible for your injuries.

In the vast majority of personal injury cases, you must prove that the other party was legally negligent before recovering any damages

Birmingham, Alabama civil litigation lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory.

n Alabama, a breach of contract occurs when one of the parties to a contract fails to fulfill their obligations under the agreement. This can happen in a number of ways, such as by failing to deliver goods or services, failing to pay money, or failing to perform a specific

Birmingham, Alabama insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on bad faith breach of an insurance contract.

In Alabama, an insurance company may be liable for bad faith if it breaches its duty to act in good faith and with reasonable dispatch in handling an insurance claim. This duty arises from the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing that is inherent in a

Montgomery, Alabama civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on job discrimination thoeries under 42 U.S.C. 2000e.

"42 U.S.C. 2000e, also known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The law applies to employers with 15 or more employees, empl

Brunswick, Georgia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the State Court of Wayne County, Georgia, STCV2021000027, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

cLane Company, Inc. is one of the largest supply chain services leaders in the United States, providing grocery and foodservice solution

West Palm Beach, Florida consumer law lawyer represent Plaintiff who sued defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory under 47 U.S.C. 227, which provides, in part:

(b) Restrictions on use of automated telephone equipment
(1) ProhibitionsIt shall be unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is withi

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114, which provides:

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, dis

Cheyenne, Wyoming insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants bad faith breach of insurance contract theories.

This case was filed in the Third Judicial District, Lincoln County, CV2022-91-DC, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

"Wyoming bad faith law is a set of laws that govern the relationship between insurance companies and their policyholde

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.


Plaintiff Stoney M. Currin, II brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that while a pretrial detainee at the Oklahoma County Detention Center, he was subjected to excessive use of force by one or more detention officers

Seattle, Washington civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant accused for fraudulently billing the federal government for health care services that were never performed.

The U.S. Department of Justice, the Washington State Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Division, accused United Wound Healing, P.S. with violating the False Claims Act by improperly billing Medicare and Med

Columbia, Missouri employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on wrongful termination theories.

Halderman sued the City, the City’s Mayor, and the Aldermen who had voted to terminate him in the Circuit Court of Boone County. Halderman sought judicial review of the City’s termination decision. He also alleged that he was entitled to damages because the City and Cit

Sherman, Texas insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

In Texas, bad faith breach of contract is a tort that allows a plaintiff to recover damages for the insurer's unreasonable and unfair conduct in handling a claim. To prove bad faith breach of contract, the plaintiff must show that:

The parties had a contract

McAllen, Texas insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

"In Texas, insurance companies have a duty to act in good faith when handling claims. This means that they must investigate claims promptly, fairly, and reasonably. If an insurance company fails to do this, it may be liable for bad faith.

To prove bad faith, the

Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

"Premises liability law in Texas is a complex area of law that governs the legal duties of property owners to keep their premises safe for visitors. The law varies depending on the status of the visitor, but in general, property owners owe a duty of care to all visitors

Greensboro, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with computer fraud.

Robert Matthew Brittan, of Lexington, was previously employed by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the MDNC as a court management analyst wherein he managed and configured computer products operated by the court’s employees. BRITTAIN resigned from this position in April 2022 afte

Central Islip, New York civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming $161 million in damages.

This case was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of, 613985/2022, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.


On October 14, 2022, Jonathan Krasner (“Plaintiff”), on behalf of himself a

Central Islip, New York personal Injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the : Supreme Court State of New York, Nassau County, 601171/2022, and was removed to federal court by Defendant.

Premises liability law in New York is a complex area of law that governs the legal obligations of property owners to keep th

Jefferson City, Missouri personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a negligence theory.

"Missouri personal injury law is a complex area of law that governs the rights of individuals who have been injured due to the negligence of another person. If you have been injured in an accident, it is important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney to discus

Houston, Texas civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory.

This case was filed in the 295th District Court of Harris County, TX, 21-28221 and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

"Under Texas law, a breach of contract occurs when a party to a contract fails to perform an act that it has expressly or impliedly promise

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

"Arkansas personal injury law is a complex area of law that governs the rights of individuals who have been injured due to the negligence of another person. If you have been injured in an accident, it is important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney to dis

Akron, Ohioa employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory.

Defendant is the manufacturer of GOJO Hand Cleaner and Purell Advanced Hand Sanitzer and similar products.

"The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is a federal law that establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting

Covington, Kentucky personal Injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Boone Circuit Court, 22-CI-00115 and was removed to federal court by Defendants.

"Kentucky personal injury law is a complex area of law that governs the rights of individuals who have been injured due to the negligence of another person. If

Concord, New Hampshire personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence and auto insurance liability theories.

"New Hampshire follows a modified comparative negligence rule, which means that a plaintiff can still recover damages for their injuries even if they were partially at fault for the accident, as long as they were not more than 50% at fault. The

New York, New York consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on wrongful disclosure of video tape rental or sales records in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2710, which provides:

(a) Definitions.—For purposes of this section—
(1) the term “consumer” means any renter, purchaser, or subscriber of goods or services from a video tape service provider;
(2) th

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who used Defendant on an auto negligence insurance law theory.

"Pennsylvania follows a modified comparative negligence rule, which means that you can recover damages if you are less than 50% at fault for an accident. If you are found to be more than 50% at fault, you will not be able to recover any damages.