Zachary Wilson v. Melvin J. Fleck v. Routeteam Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Route Team Inc., et al.
Detroit, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Fleck.
The Estate of Zeljko Dojcinovic, deceased, by its Personal Representative Danes Dojcinovic, et al. v. Citizens Insurance Company of the Midwest, et al.
Port Huron, Michigan insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on breach of insurance contract theories claiming more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of the breaches.
Renee Strothman v. Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. d/b/a GLC Live at 20 Monore
Kalamazoo, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
Irenetta Hawkins v. Steve Sharp Transportation, Inc. and Gregory Dolan Larson
Beaumont, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
Leticia Garza v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and Homero Uribe
Brownsville, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of an auto negligence caused by Uribe.
Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product designed, manufactured and/or sold by Defendant. This case apparently related to Gardasil which is an HPV caccine for use in the preventio
Joseph Steven Holcombe v. The Baltmore Company, LLC
Asheville, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
Marquis A. Owens and Angela P. Clark v. Robert J. Shields, Jr. and U-Haul Co. of Arizona
Statesville, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
Himanshu Doshi v. The Cinncinnati Insurance Company
Charlotte, North Carolina insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract claiming $75,000 in damages as a result of the breach.
Faustina Cathey v. Abbott Laboratories, Mead Johnson & Company, LLC and Mead Johnson Nutrition Company
Greensboro, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on product liability theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous produce designed, manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.
Jason Jagger Naves v. Stavros Evangelos Feredinos, et al.
Greensboro, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on personal injury theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.
Curtis Sheaffer and Luanne Sheaffer v. First Protective Insurance Company
d/b/a Frontline Insurance
Raleigh, North Carolina insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of an insurance contract claiming more than $76,000 in damages as a direct result of the denial of their insurance claim by Defendant.
Alexandria, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Governmental Tort Claims Act negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $1,010,000,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.
James T. Barnette v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Alexandria, Virginia insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $220,000 in damages as a result of the Defendant's wrongful breach of contract.
Thomas Matheny v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, et al.
Charleston, West Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of acts, errors and omissions by Defendant in the operation a chemical plant.
Huntington, West Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores.
Shelia J. Perry v. Daniel Beckner, Sr. and Edith Beckner
Huntington, West Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a car wreck.
Theodore R. Green, Jr. and Billie J. Green v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Beckley, West Virginia insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of the failure on the part of Defendant to pay their claim.
Christine Parziale v. Josph Bladecki and Nancy Steen d/b/a The Boulders Motel & Cottage
Concord, New Hamphsire personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and injuries as a direct caused by a
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and injuries as a direct result of an auto accident caused by Defendant.
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle collision.
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle collision.
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle collision.
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle collision.
