Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle collision.
Terry Hobbs v. "Natalie PASDAR, individually, and Natalie Pasdar,
Emily Robison, and Martha Seidel d/b/a Dixie Chicks
Plaintiff Terry Hobbs moves for partial summary judgment as to the fair report privilege and opinion (Doc. No. 26) and moves for partial summary judgment as to his status as a public figure (Doc. No. 31). Defendant Natalie Pasdar moves for summary judgment on all claims against her (Doc. No. 38). Defendants Martha Seidel (now Martha Maguire), Emily Robison, and the Dixie Chicks move for summa
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle collision.
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle collision.
Justin Billie and Gina Billie v. Corey Blake Stewart d/b/a Corey Blake Stewart Construction
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on civil fraud theories claiming more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries.<
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
Sue Reager and Translate Your World International, LLC v. Worldwide Tech Connections, LLC and Jeffry Williams
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on breach of contract theories claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages.
Pamela Fortenberry v. Tulsa Community College, et al.
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendants on Governmental Tort Claims Act premises liability negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a result of an accident on Defendant's campus as a result of a dangerous condition that existed on January 1, 2017.
Honolulu, Hawaii personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Governmental Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of substandard health care.
Helena Krizek v. The Queen's Medical Center, et al.
Honolulu, Hawaii personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on medical malpractice negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of substandard health care.
Tracy Ann Childers v. Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Hilton Management, Inc.
Honolulu, Hawaii personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident on Defendants' property
Beaumont, Texas insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract claiming to have suffered $200,000 in damages as a direct result of Defendant's denial of Plaintiff's claim.
Angel J. Docobo and Lucelia A. Docobo v. Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest
Tampa, Florida insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of Defendant failing and refusing to pay Plaintiffs' claim.
Central Islip, New York personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff in a class action case based on a fraud theory claiming more than $5 million in damages and/or injuries from lead and cadmium filled dark chocolate sold by The Hersey Company.
South Sooner Holdings, LLC, et al.v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Muskogee, Oklahoma insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on breach of insurance contract theories claiming more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of the breach.
Lazy S Ranch Properties, LLC v. Valero Terminaling and Distribution, et al.
Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence damage to property theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of failure to exercise due care and as a direct result Plaintiff's property was damaged.
Rebecca Brewer Johnson and Randall Johnson v. Farmers Insurance Company
Muskogee, Oklahoma insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result the denial of his claim.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sue Defendants on Fair Debt Collection Act violation theories under 15 U.S.C. 1692.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liabilty theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of defective and unreasonably dangerous product designed, manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.
Kristen West v. Kelsey Smith, M.D., Shawn Grant, M.D.Stillwater Family Care, LLC, Touchstone Imaging Stillwater and Diagnostic Imaging Associates, Inc.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on medical malpractice negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result on substandard health care provided to A.F., a minor.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
Leo T. Epperson v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result.
It is recognized that insurance companies are quasi-public in nature and are subject of state control for the protection and benefit of the public.
