Nekisha Marshall and John Miller v. Agustin Lazo-Garcia and Luisa Emilia Diaz Hernandez |
Atlanta, Georgia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Tyra Fuqua v. Carlos Cuello, Juan Carlos Mesa and Marlon, LLA Transport, Inc. |
Macon, Georgia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
David Gregory German, Jr. v. Prophete Flobert and IDA Transportation Services, LLC |
Savannah, Georgia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Desiree Peacock v. WL Blackwater 1, LLC |
Pensacola, Florida personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care on the part of one or more of the Defendant's employees. |
Luis Carlos Cortina v. Luis Manuel Mispheta |
Fort Fauderdale, Florida personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory |
Mark Langston v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory |
Mauricio Sanchez v. Dennis D. Wood and S&H Transportation, Inc. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
L. Duane Wilson and Helen L. Wilson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company |
Tulsa, Oklahoma insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a result of the breach. $1 (10-07-2022 - OK) |
Jimmy Doolittle v. American Modern Home Insurance Company |
Muskogee, Oklahoma insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a result of the breach. |
Maurice M. McKnight v. William F. Preset, Jr. and Starbuck Trucking, LLC |
Wichita, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Corey Wells v. Robert Connolly |
Casper, Wyoming personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory |
Glen S. Babich v. Ignacio Rodriguez and Temp Trans Corporation |
Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Kristina O'Boyle v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al. |
Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries in a accident in one of Defendant's stores. |
United States of America v. Christine Priola |
Washington, DC: Criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with Priola, 50, pleaded guilty in July to charges of obstruction of an official proceeding. She also agreed to pay $2,000 in restitution to the Architect of the Capitol for her share of the approximately $1.5 million in damages caused by the riot. She is among at least 53 Ohioans charged for their roles in a riot meant to stop Cong $0 (10-28-2022 - DC) |
Joann P. Stang and Richard Stang v. Owners Insurance Company |
Minneapolis, Minnesota insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on an uninsured motorist insurance policy claim theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of an car wreck. $0 (10-18-2022 - MN) |
Monte Wissel v. United Rentals, Inc. |
Minot, North Dakota personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident. |
Brandon Oetken v. Ashley Danneman |
Sioux Falls, South Dakota personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident. |
Thomas Barrett v. Luke Johnson and B Bar R Livestock |
Omaha, Nebraska personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. |
Sarah Davis, et al. v. United States of America |
St. Louis, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident involving a postal vehicle. |
William Ogle v. Christopher Moore and Covenant Transport, Inc. |
Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory |
Andrew Russell and Brandon Gabbert v. Denver Pigg and Yates Construction, LLC |
El Dorado, Arkansas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on a auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident. $1 (10-27-2022 - AR) |
Phillip Rodriguez v. United States of America |
Rockford, Illinois personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an motor vehicle accident caused by a federal government employee. |
United States of America v. Honeywell International, Inc. |
Washington, DC: civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant accused of violating the False Claims Act by selling defective material for bullet proof vests used by law enforcement officers. |
Bahman Seyvani and Elahe Seyvani v. Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC, et al. |
Austin, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on a premises liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendants' stores. |
Qing Sam Chen v. Krysa Renae Perine |
Austin, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Defendant's failure to exercise due care. |
Next Page |