Quiet Title Law |
|
United States of America v. Aleydy Navarrete-Gutierrez
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with unlawful reentry of a removed alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326, which provides:
(a) In generalSubject to subsection (b), any alien who—
(1) has been denied admission, excluded, deported, or removed or has departed the United States while an order of exclusion, deportation, or removal is outstanding, and th... More... $0 (03-30-2023 - OK)
|
United States of America v. Emmanuel Josiah Ahaisse
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Scott Troy represented Defendant charged with failing to register as a sex offender.
18 U.S.C. 2250 provides:
(a) In General.—Whoever—
(1) is required to register under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act;
(2)
(A) is a sex offender as defined for the purposes of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification A... More... $0 (03-30-2023 - OK)
|
United States of America v. Gavin Lee Shadrick
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with misprison of a felony.
18 U.S.C. 4 provides:
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall b... More... $0 (03-30-2023 - OK)
|
Just Between Friends Franchise System, Inc. v. Samone Gibson Enterprises, LLC et al
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff which sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory.
15 U.S.C. 1114 provides:
(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution... More... $0 (03-29-2023 - OK)
|
United States of America v. Jose Badillo-Fernandez
|
Spokane, Washington criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with unlawful reentry into the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1325(a)(1).
(a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts
Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as de... More... $0 (03-29-2023 - WA)
|
United States of America v. Andrew Nathan Hernandez
|
Fresno, California criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with knowingly aiming a beam of a laser pointer at a Kern County helicopter.
On Dec. 26, 2020, Andrew Nathan Hernandez, age 20, of Bakersfield, aimed the beam of a green laser at the Sheriff’s helicopter, striking it multiple times. Hernandez was attending a street race in the area of Hughes and White Lane in Baker... More... $0 (03-29-2023 - CA)
|
United States of America v. Saul Navarrete De La Cerda
|
Dallas, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with illegal reentry following removal.
8 U.S.C. §1326(a) and (b)(1) Illegal Reentry After Deportation
(1) in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b).
(a) In generalSubject to subsection (b), any alien who—
(1) has been denied admission, excluded, deported, or removed or has departed the United States while a... More... $0 (03-29-2023 - TX)
|
United States of America v. Kathryn Drey
|
Pensacola, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with acting with a conflict of interest.
Kathryn Drey, 55, of Pensacola, Florida, directed contracts from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Florida to companies in which her spouse had a financial interest, including while she served as chief of the office’s Civil Division. Drey concealed he... More... $0 (03-29-2023 - FL)
|
Bob Dawson, et al. v. Porch.com, Inc., et al.
|
Seattle, Washington consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theories.
Defendants claimed to have identified “a real question” regarding the viability of plaintiffs' autodialer claims, and plaintiffs have not shown that they will be prejudiced if a stay is ordered. Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 1981).<... More... $0 (03-28-2023 - WA)
|
United States of America v. Otilio Rodriguez Toledo and Alicia Aispuro Hernandez
|
San Diego, California criminal defense lawyers represented Defendants charged with conspiring to smuggle and distribute pesticides and veterinary drugs not approved for use in the United States.
Otilio Rodriguez Toledo and Alicia Aispuro Hernandez, husband and wife from Thermal, California, acknowledged that since at least December of 2018, they had been engaged in smuggling pesticides a... More... $0 (03-28-2023 - CA)
|
Ryan Miller v. Titan Tire Corporation of Freeport
|
Fort Smith, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability theory.
This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Sebastian County, 66FCV-21-00461, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
In Arkansas, a product liability action may be based on negligence or strict liability and may include claims of design defect; manufactu... More... $0 (03-27-2023 - AR)
|
Joseph Katz and Chays Katz v. Cheskel Laudau, et al.
|
White Plains, New York personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on racketeering theories.
18 U.S.C. 1962 provides:
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person who has received any income derived, directly or indirectly, from a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt in which such person has participated as a principal within... More... $0 (03-24-2023 - NY)
|
Eric Carvan v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's
|
San Antonio, Texas insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insuranc e contract theory claiming more than $75,000 in damages.
This case was filed in the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, 2022CI20784, and was removed to federal court by Defendant.
INSURANCE CODE
TITLE 5. PROTECTION OF CONSUMER INTERESTS
<... More... $1 (03-24-2023 - TX)
|
Jason De La Cruz v. Ability Recovery Services, LLC, et al.
|
San Antonio, Texas consumer credit lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory.
The Act (Title VI of the Consumer Credit Protection Act) protects information collected by consumer reporting agencies such as credit bureaus, medical information companies and tenant screening services. Information in a consumer report cannot be provided to ... More... $1 (03-24-2023 - TX)
|
Janet Rodriguez Flores and Yris Patricia Sanchez Moreno v. United States of America
|
San Antonio, Texas immigration lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Conn Schrader, Director, National Visa Center, United States Department of State, seeking a writ of mandamus to adjusticate a visa petition.
8 U.S.C. 1329 provides:
The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of all causes, civil and criminal, brought by the United States that arise under t... More... $0 (03-24-2023 - TX)
|
Oklahoma Call of Reproductive Justice v. Drummond
|
¶1 The Petitioners consist of healthcare providers, Tulsa Women's Reproductive Clinic, LLC, Alan Braid, M.D., Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma and an advocacy group, the Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice. The Respondents consist of the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, the district attorneys of Oklahoma ... More... $0 (03-23-2023 - OK)
|
United States of America v. Amit Bhardwaj
|
New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer is represented Defendant charged with insider trading based on material non-public information misappropriately obtained from his employer.
Federal Courthouse - ... More... $0 (03-22-2023 - NY)
Elizabeth Dial v. Department of Veterans Affairs
|
Wichita, Kansas civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e.

Federal Courthouse - Wichita, Kansas
More... $0 (03-21-2023 - KS)
United States of America v. Raul Angel Alvarado Ramos
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma illegal immigration criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with unlawful reentry of a removed alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326
8 U.S.C. 1326, provides:
Subject to subsection (b), any alien who—
(1) has been denied admission, excluded, deported, or removed or has departed the United States while an order of exclusion, deportation, ... More... $0 (03-20-2023 - OK)
|
De Anza Angel Dimas v. Pecos Independent School District Board of Education, et al.
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants claiming that they violated her constitutional rights
Federal Courthouse - Albuquerque, New Mexico More... $0 (03-20-2023 - NM)
United States of America v. Lavonne Kemp
|
Grand Rapids, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit fraud using the mail

Federal Courthouse - Grand Rapids, Michigan
More... $0 (03-16-2023 - )
United States of America v. John Figg
|
Grand Rapids, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with embezzlement.

Federal Courthouse - Grand Rapids, Michigan
More... $0 (03-16-2023 - MI)
C. Morrow v. Guitar Center Stores, Inc.
|
Kansas City, Missouri civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on a job discrimination theory.

Federal Courthouse - Kansas City, Missouri
More... $0 (03-15-2023 - MO)
United States of America v. Travelers Casualty and Surgty Company
|
Portland, Maine insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

Federal Courthouse - Portland, Maine
More... $0 (03-15-2023 - )
United States of America v. Suzanne Craft
|
Louisville, Kentucky Criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with mailing communications containing threats to injure others in November and December 2020.
|
|
|
|
| |
| |