New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with racketeering, wire fraud, money laundering, and Truth-In-Lending Act (“TILA”) offenses.

* * *

Legal issue Can the government obtain clear title to forfeited substitute assets following a criminal conviction and resolution of all third-party claims?
Headnote

CRIMINAL LAW. FORFE

Dallas, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Possession with the Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance, Aiding and Abetting

Possession with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances: A Summary

Possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance is a serious offense that can carry severe penalties under both federal and state laws. It

San Antonio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cyberstalking and making threats of injury in interstate communications.

Steven Daniel Weste was convicted for cyberstalking and sending threatening interstate communications.He filed a motion to suppress, contending that the warrantless search of his cell phone while in a halfway house violated the Fourth A

Rockville, Maryland family law lawyers represented the parties in divorce.

The parties were married on August 18, 2001. At the time of the trial in 2023, Wife was 55 years old, and Husband was 57 years old.

Four children were born as a result of the marriage. At the time of the trial, the oldest child (born in 2003) was a college student. The second child was born in 2005, the t

Richmond, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violating a protective order.

On November 24, 2018, L.M. obtained a permanent protective order against appellant, with whom she had a young son. The protective order prohibited appellant from having "contact of any kind with" L.M. except as permitted by a custody or visitation order and from "commit[ting] ac

Athens, Tennessee family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce action.

After more than twenty years of marriage, Skidmore Camm Garrett ("Husband") filed for divorce from Jona McKeehan Garrett ("Wife"). She responded with a countercomplaint for divorce. Because their children were adults by the time of trial, issues mainly centered around alimony and the division of marital prop

Memphis, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented Claimants for property seized by the United States of America.

Brentwood, New Hampshire civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff seeking ) ruling that the administration of the Statewide Education Property Tax (SWEPT) violates Part II, Article 5 of the State Constitution. See RSA 76:3 (2012); RSA 76:8 (Supp. 2024).

In 2022, the plaintiffs, individuals and entities owning real property in New Hampshire, brought this case. They seek, among ot

Boston, Massachusetts family law lawyers represented the husband and wife in a divorce action.

"In making a property division and alimony determination under G. L. c. 208, § 34, a judge must make findings indicating that [she] has considered all factors relevant under § 34, and has not considered any irrelevant factors." T.E. v. A.0., 82 Mass.App.Ct. 586, 592 (2012), quoting Bowring v.

Boston, Massachusetts bankruptcy lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking to avoid the transfer of his interest in his home.

In 2008, Tran granted Citizens Bank, N.A. (the "Bank") a mortgage on the Property. In 2022, the Bank foreclosed on the Property at an auction sale in which Herbert Jacobs was the high bidder. Jacobs and the Bank executed a memorandum of sale at the close of the auct

Las Cruces, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an negligence theory.

* * *

New Mexico operates under a "fault-based" or "tort" system for personal injury cases, meaning the person or entity responsible for causing the accident is liable for damages. New Mexico also employs a pure comparative negligence rule, meaning a plaintiff's damages can

Houston, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with health care fraud
Nearly 50 charged in Southern District of Texas as part of national health care fraud takedown

Holdenville, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on breach of contract and tort theories.

On July 19, 2017, Diamond Homes, through Mike Emery, provided the Proes with an estimate for the construction of a home. [1] The estimate was provided on a form titled "DIAMOND HOMES COST ESTIMATE." Bart Patterson testified that the estimate was left in

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

LARCENY OF LOST PROPERTY, in violation of 21 O.S. 1702

I created MoreLaw 30 years ago to help people find experienced lawyers to represent them in Tulsa County.

Click the link above to see a lawyer ready and willing to represent you if you have a legal problem.

Need more help? Call:

Los Angles, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with several counts of possession with intent to distribute the narcotics found in his car and apartment under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i); and being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g).

Jefferson City, Missouri criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with bank robbery by force or violence, felony possession of a firearm, and felony transportation of a firearm.

* * *

Federal bank robbery, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2113, involves the taking or attempted taking of property from a bank by force, violence, or intimidation. This includes scenarios w

Rapid City, South Dakota criminal defense lawyer represnted the Defendant charged with carjacking amd bramdosjomg a foredar, during a crime of violence.

* * *

Federal robbery and aiding and abetting laws, as defined under 18 U.S.C. § 2, hold individuals liable for the crimes of others if they assist in or encourage the commission of a federal offense. Essentially, anyone who aid

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on a premises liability negligence theory.

* * *

In Indiana, premises liability law holds property owners responsible for injuries occurring on their property due to unsafe conditions, provided the owner was negligent in maintaining the premises or failed to warn visitors of known hazards. To establish liabi

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence case.

* * *

In Oklahoma, truck accident claims are governed by fault-based rules with a modified comparative negligence standard. This means the party responsible for causing the accident is liable for damages, but if the injured party is also at fault, their compensation can be r

Florence, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability negligence theory.

* * *

In South Carolina, premises liability law holds property owners accountable for injuries that occur on their property due to unsafe conditions. This means if a person gets hurt because a property owner was negligent in maintaining a safe environment, the own

Charleston, South Carolina persnal injury lawyer reprsented the Plaintiff on a premises liability law theory.

this case was filed in the Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, 2024CP1002190, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

In South Carolina, premises liability law holds property owners and occupiers responsible for injuries sustained by visitors due to unsaf

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

PLACING EXPLOSIVES IN OR NEAR BUILDING/VEHICLE/RAILROAD, in violation of 21 O.S. 1767.1;
MALICIOUS INJURY OR DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY LESS THAN 1000, in violation of 21 O.S. 1760 A1;
and
OBSTRUCTING AN OFFICER, in violation of 21 O.S. 540.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability negligence theory.

1. That Plaintiff, CYNTHIA BRADLEY (hereafter referred to as "CB"), is and was a r~deilt
of the City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma at all material times hereto.
2. That Defendant, DOLGENCORP, LLC, doing business as DOLLAR GENERAL, is and was
a foreign limited

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

KNOWINGLY RECEIVING/CONCEALING STOLEN PROPERTY, in violation of 21 O.S. 1713;
and
UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402

Camden, New Jersey criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with attempt and conspiracy to commit mail fraud.

* * *

Mail fraud is a federal crime involving the use of the U.S. Mail or other commercial carriers to execute a scheme to defraud. It requires proof of a scheme to defraud and the use of the mail to further that scheme. Conviction can lead to imprisonme