Civil Rights - Title VII - Retaliatory Acts - Employment Plaintiffs claimed that they were retaliated against for filing EEOC complaints. Defendant denied retaliation and asserted that plaintiffs abused the complaint process. Gamboa had worked for the Postal Service for 14 years and Slusser for 12 years.

Civil rights - Title VII - 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq. - hostile work environment sexual harassment and retaliation claim for reporting the harassment. Plaintiff began working as a police office in the Houston Police Department in 1983. In November 1990, Williamson was assigned to the Organized Crime Squad where she worked in the same squad room as Officer Doug McLeod, with whom she was sometimes p

Sex discrimination and retaliation in volation of Title VII - 42 U.S.C. 2000e. Plaintiff sued her former employer Svenska Handelsbanken under title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the New York City Human Rights Law, NYC Admin. Code sec. 8-502, alleging sex discrimination and retalion for filing an EEOC complaint.

Retaliatory discharge, severance pay and other claims by highly compensated executives who sued their former employer and its owner for ERISA benefits allegedly due them under a phantom stock plan. All three plaintiffs claimed that they were discharged in retaliation for exercising their rights under the plan. They sought benefits under the plan based on the "redemption value," as opposed t

Race Discrimination and Retaliation - Plaintiff sued Pepsi-Cola for alleged wrongful termination because she was black and as retaliation for previous complaints of race discrimination. Hawkins also alleged she was subjected to racially hostile work environments with intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Defendant filed a motion for Summary Judgment on Hawkins' hostile work

Gender Discrimination and Retaliation - Plaintiff sued Monsanto Company claiming gender discrimination when her employer eliminated her position, failed to transfer her to a position that would preserve or enhance her current salary and by giving her work with intolerable conditions. Plaintiff claims she was constructively discharged.

Violation of Michigan's eavesdropping statute, illegal search and seizure, emotional distress, retaliation and violation of public policy claims by eleven firefighters whose telephone calls were secretly taped by Fire Chief, Stephen Ahles. Plaintiffs claimed that the Chief taped the conversations in an effort to obtain some advantage in negotiations with the firefighter's union. The Chief denied

Racial Discrimination - During plantiff's first one and one-half years of employment, it appeared to him that white employees were receiving overtime opprotunities denied to him and that his wage increases lagged behind those of white employees. Plantiff filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opprotunity Commission(EEOC)in November 1990, alleging wrongful denial of promotion,

Sexual Harassment/Retaliatory Discharge - Plantiff, one of Hewlett-Packard's top national sales representatives, filed a complaint with the EEOC claiming sexual harassment. She claimed that she was forced to go on a company retreat which she characterized as a "drunken orgy" where she was subjected to her district managers offensive language, excessive drinking, body shots and to men publically u

Sexual Harassment/Retaliatory Discharge - Plantiff, one of Hewlett-Packard's top national sales representatives, filed a complaint with the EEOC claiming sexual harassment. She claimed that she was forced to go on a company retreat which she characterized as a "drunken orgy" where she was subjected to her district managers offensive language, excessive drinking, body shots, and two men publically

The case involved steering, advertising and retaliation claims made by the Central Alabama Fair Housing Center and five individuals, under various sections of the Fair Housing Act and Sections 1981 and 1982 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The plaintiffs sued two Montgomery, Alabama real estate companies (Lowder Realty Co., Inc. and Lowder New Homes, Inc.), their parent company (The Colonial Co

Plaintiff alleged he was wrongfully discharged under Montana's Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act, Mont Code Annotated §§39-2-901 and following, when he was laid off at the start of winter 1995 and not rehired in early spring 1996. Because Maddox inadvertently neglected to enroll Plaintiff in a state apprenticeship program, Plaintiff requested Davis Bacon wages a few weeks before he was

Sec 1981 Race discrimination and Retaliation & Title VII Race Discrimination and Retaliation. Plaintiff claimed he was discriminated based on race and terminated in retaliation for filing a charge of discrimination. Defendant contended Plaintiff was fired for poor performance.

Civil rights - 42 U.S.C. 1988 and 2000e-5(k) - age discrimination, race discrimination and retaliation claims by employee who was terminated after she filed an administrative charge of discrimination.

Civil rights - 42 U.S.C. 1983 - race discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII. Plaintiff started working for Roadway in 1970. In 1992, he transferred from Kansas City to Denver. He claimed that he suffered racial harassment at Roadway's facility - he received two racially offensive notes, and fellow employees sabotaged his truck and otherwise interfered with his work. He complaine

Civil rights - sexual harassment and wrongful termination claims by two waitresses. Bother of the plaintiffs claimed that they were sexually harassed by defendant's general manager and staff employees. Complaints were ignored to resulted in retaliation and threats.

Civil rights - Title VII - Wrongful termination - Plaintiff claimed that she was fired because she filed criminal charges against co-worker, Tom McKee. Reynolds denied the claims and asserted that plaintiff's employment was terminated for lawful business reasons realting to her job performance. Turner was hired as a receptionist at Reynolds Ford in 1993. In 1994 she became a sales rep

Breach of contract and retaliation under the Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993 by plaintiff who was hired in 1994 to be the Executive Director of Odom Antennas. Shortly after being hired and relocated to Arkansas, plaintiff presented defendant's president with a written employment agreement which provided for one year of separation pay in the event of termination. The relationship between the pa

Defamation - Plaintiff claimed that his reputation and consulting business, Foster Steam Turbine Consultants, ltd.., were damaged when he was banned from General Electrics property. Plaintiff claimed that company officials criticized him in memos and to his clients. Plaintiff formed his company when he was laid off in May, 1995 but he was cutoff from the company when the company officials accuse

Breach of contract and claim for retaliation under Arkansas Civil Rights Act and Title VII of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964. Plaintiff was terminated several days after signing an employment agreement which stated "in the event of termination of employment for any reason other than voluntary termination on the part of the Employee, the employer agrees to separation pay equal to one

Civil Rights - 42 U.S.C. 2000e - Job discrimination and retaliation claims by form Lincoln County, Oklahoma district attorney's office for quid pro quo sexual harassment and retaliatory termination for participating in a grand jury investigation of Defendant Zimmerman's operation of his office.

Retaliatory discharge - Plaintiff was injured while working for defendant and filed a workers' compensation claim. When plaintiff represented that she was about to come back to work, she was fired. Plaintiff claimed that her termination was in retaliation for having filed the workers' compensation claim and defendant claimed that Crabtree had copied confidential client information.

Civil rights - job discrimination - 42 U.S.C. 2000e - Gender based discrimination (disparate treatment) and retaliation - details unknown.

Civil rights - Age discrimination and retaliation under the ADEA, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 623(a) & (d), where a nurse alleged the hospital failed to further schedule her for work due to her age. The hospital denied age was a factor.

Shooting with intent to kill. The State claimed that Defendant attempted to kill the victime in retaliation for having testified against a fellow gang member. The victim was said to be member of a rival gang.