Sakwe Balintulo v. Daimler, A.G. |
The question presented is whether to issue a writ of mandamus to resolve in favor of the defendants this long-lived litigation under the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”)—a statute, passed in 1789, that was rediscovered and revitalized by the courts in recent decades to permit aliens to sue for alleged serious violations of human rights occurring abroad. The statute was first deployed in 1980 again... More... $0 (08-21-2013 - NY) |
David Hendleman v. Los Altos Apartments, L.P. |
Named plaintiffs David Hendleman and Anne Aaronson appeal from the order of the trial court denying their motion for certification of a class of tenants at the Los Altos Apartments in the context of their lawsuit against the landlord. Plaintiffs brought this action alleging the landlord failed to repair and maintain the property in a safe and habitable condition over a period of 10 months, unlawfu... More... $0 (08-20-2013 - CA) |
Janat Nansamba v. North Shore Medical Center, Inc. |
When litigation goes awry, lawyers sometimes scramble to find a scapegoat. So it is here: having conspicuously failed to protect the record, the plaintiff's lawyers attempt to shift the blame to their opposing counsel. Concluding, as we do, that this diversionary tactic lacks force, we affirm the district court's denial of the plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment. |
Jeff Edward Woods v. The City of Norman |
Jeff Edward Woods sued The City of Norman on a wrongful termination theory claiming: |
Phyllis Bradbury v. City of Eastport |
[¶1] Phyllis Bradbury and David Gholson (collectively, plaintiffs) appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Washington County, R. Murray, J.) denying their special motion to dismiss the counterclaims of First Perry Realty, LLC, CPM Constructors, and the City of Eastport (collectively, defendants) pursuant to Maine’s anti-SLAPP statute, 14 M.R.S. § 556 (2012).1 This appeal gives us the oppor... More... $0 (08-01-2013 - ME) |
Kim Burt v. Andrews County Hospital District d/b/a Permian Regional Medical Center |
After filing a worker’s compensation claim, Appellant Kim Burt filed suit against her former employer, Andrews County Hospital District doing business as Permian Regional Medical Center (the Hospital), Appellee, alleging retaliatory discharge under Chapter 451 of the Texas Labor Code and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Burt now appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor ... More... $0 (07-24-2013 - TX) |
Victor H. Tamayo v. Sheriff Omar Lucio |
A trial court dismissed appellant Victor Tamayo’s case by granting a plea to the jurisdiction filed by the appellee, Cameron County Sheriff Omar Lucio in his official capacity. In two issues, Tamayo argues that: (1) governmental immunity did not bar |
Gladys Hernandez v. Select Medical Corporation and Select Specialty Hospital-Midland, Inc. |
Gladys Hernandez appeals the trial court’s no-evidence summary judgment in favor of Select Medical Corporation and Select Specialty Hospital-Midland, Inc. In her sole appellate issue, Hernandez contends that the summary judgment evidence raised genuine issues of material fact on her retaliatory discharge claim |
Keith Pearson v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority |
Keith Pearson appeals the district court’s summary judgment for his employer, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), on Pearson’s claims of employment discrimination and retaliation. We affirm. |
Keith Pearson v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority |
Keith Pearson appeals the district court’s summary judgment for his employer, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), on Pearson’s claims of employment discrimination and retaliation. We affirm. |
Thomas Trent Pettigrew v. State of Oklahoma |
This appeal presents only one issue for consideration: whether a settlement agreement between Thomas Trent Pettigrew and the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety (DPS) waived the state’s “Eleventh Amendment” right not to be sued in federal court. Although the language of the agreement is not explicit, the agreement’s reference to bringing suit in federal court has no reasonable constructio... More... $0 (07-15-2013 - OK) |
Christine E. Reule v. Colony Insurance Company |
In thirteen issues, Christine E. Reule argues the trial court erred by granting Colony Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment disposing of all of Reule’s claims. We affirm. |
D&M Marine, Inc. d/b/a Phipps & Company Homes v. J. Neal Turner and Kerie B. Turner |
J. Neal Turner and Kerie B. Turner sued D&M Marine, Inc. d/b/a Phipps & Company Homes and others over damage in the construction of their home. The jury found in favor of the Turners and against D&M Marine on the Turners’ claims of negligence, deceptive trade practices, breach of warranty, and attorneys’ fees. The trial court awarded engineering and consulting fees after a post-trial hearing, ... More... $0 (07-11-2013 - TX) |
Audrey Striplin v. University of Tulsa |
Audrey Striplin sued University of Tulsa on a wrongful termination theory claiming: |
James Ronald Smith v. Sheridan Trucking Company |
James Ronald Smith sued Sheridan Trucking Company on a wrongful termination theory claiming: |
Jorge Granados v. Doña Ana County |
Jorge Granados, the former County Public Works Director, sued Dona Ana County for creating a hostile work environment and then retaliated against him for complaining. Plaintiff claimed that the County had a pattern of retaliation against employees. |
Michael Gwynn v. City of Philadelphia |
City of Philadelphia Police Officers Michael Gwynn and Brendon Ryan appeal a summary judgment entered in favor of several of their fellow officers and the City. Appellants asserted constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, statutory claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and various state law claims. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the judgment of the District Court. |
Maetta Vance v. Ball State University |
In this case, we decide a question left open in Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U. S. 742 (1998), and Faragher v. Boca Raton, 524 U. S. 775 (1998), namely, who qualifies as a “supervisor” in a case in which an employee asserts a Title VII claim for workplace harassment? Under Title VII, an employer’s liability for such harassment may depend on the status of the harasser. ... More... $0 (06-24-2013 - DC) |
State of Texas v. Manuel Nelson Flores-Carrasco |
The State of Texas charged Manuel Nelson Flores-Carrasco, age 25, with capital murder, threatening Gomez and two counts of aggravated assault in connection with the stabbing deahto of his girlfriend, Norma Gomez, age 39, in 2012. An examination of the worman's body revealed that she was stabbed 11 times with a large knife. |
Michael Gwynn v. City of Philadelphia |
City of Philadelphia Police Officers Michael Gwynn and Brendon Ryan appeal a summary judgment entered in favor of several of their fellow officers and the City. Appellants asserted constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, statutory claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and various state law claims. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the judgment of the District Court. |
James Cameron Peery v. Guaranteed Auto Finance, Inc. d/b/a Automaster |
James Cameron Peery sued Guaranteed Auto Finance, Inc. d/b/a Automaster, Interstate Auto Group, Inc. d/b/a Car Hop, and First Cash Financial Services, Inc. on wrongful termination theories claiming: |
Stella Hall v. The Ohio Bell Telephone Company |
Stella Hall appeals a district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her former |
Robert Paden v. Texas County Board of County Commissioners |
Robert Paden sued the Texas County Board of County Commissioners and Ted Keeling on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983 claiming to have been injured or damaged as a direct result of having his civil rights violated by the County or one of its employees involving his free speech rights relating to a matter of public concern. |
State of Iowa v. Keith Allen Gogel |
Keith Gogel appeals from his convictions for possession of methamphetamine and unlawful possession of prescription drugs, arguing the contraband found in his car after a search during a traffic stop should have been suppressed. We agree and, therefore, reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings. |
J. M. and A. G. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services |
Our opinion and judgment dated April 19, 2013, are withdrawn, and this opinion is substituted in their place. |
Next Page |