| United States of America v. Ryan R. Vandyke |
|
Pocatello, Idaho, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm by a prohibited person. |
| State of Oregon v. Benjamin Guthrie Koteen |
|
McMinnville, Oregon, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010. |
| Justin Hooper v. The City of Tulsa |
|
Justin Hooper and the City of Tulsa dispute whether the Curtis Act, 30 Stat. 495 (1898), grants Tulsa jurisdiction over municipal violations committed by all Tulsa’s inhabitants, including Indians, in Indian country. Tulsa issued a traffic citation to Mr. Hooper, an Indian and member of the Choctaw Nation, and he paid a $150 fine for the ticket in Tulsa’s Municipal Criminal Court (“municipal $0 (06-28-2023 - OK) |
| CITY OF TULSA, Appellant v. NICHOLAS RYAN O'BRIEN, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellee, Nicholas Ryan O'Brien, was charged by Information in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa with the following misdemeanor traffic crimes: |
| Christine M. Arnold v. Ameren Illinois Company |
|
East St. Louis, Illinois, civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff. |
| Texas Department of Family and Protective Services v, D.V. |
|
Austin, Texas, family law lawyer represent Defendant in a parental termination action. |
| Alicia Rowe v. State Mutual Insurance Company |
|
Belfast, Maine insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who brought a reach-and-apply action that Rowe brought pursuant to 24-A M.R.S. § 2904 (2019).[1] See Ashe v. Enter. Rent-A-Car, 2003 ME 147, ¶ 14, 838 A.2d 1157 ("The reach and apply statute . . . enables a judgment creditor to have insurance money applied to the satisfaction of [a] judgment by bringing an action against the judgment debt $0 (09-30-2025 - ME) |
| Randy Ball v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Manchester and others. |
|
Concord, New Hampshire, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence theory. |
| United States of America v. Peter Bardunias |
|
Albany, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Attempted Enticement of a Minor. |
| The State of Oklahoma v. In the Matter of L.M., an alleged Deprived Child.Rebecca Mireles and James Moody |
|
Durant, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Defendants in a termination of parental rights case. |
| United States of America v. Leonard Brown, aka Bo |
|
Miami, Florida pro se plaintiff, without the help of a lawyer, sent a letter to the judge asking for the appoint of a laywer to help him with an application for a sentenced reduction under the First Step Act. The District court denied his application. |
| United States of America v. Byron Cordell Thomas |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of sex |
| United States of America v. Jonathan Tylor Herra |
|
Anchorage, Alaska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sexual exploitation of a child and possession and access with intent to view child pornography. |
| Ryan Corbridge v. Encompass Indemnity Company |
|
Portland, Oregon, insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on bad faith breach of contract theory. |
| Ira A. Troyer v. Maryland Casualty Company, et al. |
|
Missoula, Montana, insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory. |
| Meeka Elliott v. 3M Company, et al. |
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota, personal injury lawyers presented the Plaintiff who who on a product liability theory. |
| Brey Mafi v. Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc., et al. |
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a real property fraud claim. |
| United States of America v. Eddie Scott Seaton |
|
Little Rock, Arkansas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of anime images depicting sexually explicit acts between minor boys and an adult female. |
| Bertha Brown v. Target Corporation |
|
Detroit, Michigan, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability claim. |
| Charles Bozzo v. Jennifer Nanasy, et al. |
|
Grand Rapids, Michigan, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
| Lynn K. Pierce v. Target Corporation |
|
Rochester, New York, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability claim. |
| Stephen Berger v. Costco Wholesale Corporation |
|
Juneau, Alaska, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an employment discrimination theory. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Billy Znne Deo |
|
Okemah, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with secon-degree burglary and grand larcen and knowingly concealing stolen property. |
| United States of America v .Peter Bardunias |
|
Albany, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempting to entice a minor to engage in prohibited sexual activity. |
| United States of America v. Peter Bardunias |
|
Albany, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempting to entice a minor to engage in prohibited sexual activity. |
|
Next Page |