| United States of America v. Emmanuel Gonzalez |
|
New Haven, Connecticut, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Rodolfo Olalde Reyna |
|
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Nevada v. Tiktok, Inc., et al. |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs seeking a writ of prohibition or, alternatively, mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim in a consumer protection action. |
| Mark Fiechtner v. America West Insurance Company |
|
Canton, South Dakota insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on bad faith breach of insurance contract theory. |
| Eddie L. Bolden v. Angelo Pesavento, et al. |
|
Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sue on civil rights violation theories claiming that he was wrongfully charged, convicted, and incarcerated. |
| T.N. v. First Baptist Church of Pierce City |
|
Mount Vernon, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a corporate negligence theory. |
| Alicia Rowe v. State Mutual Insurance Company |
|
Belfast, Maine insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who brought a reach-and-apply action that Rowe brought pursuant to 24-A M.R.S. § 2904 (2019).[1] See Ashe v. Enter. Rent-A-Car, 2003 ME 147, ¶ 14, 838 A.2d 1157 ("The reach and apply statute . . . enables a judgment creditor to have insurance money applied to the satisfaction of [a] judgment by bringing an action against the judgment debt $0 (09-30-2025 - ME) |
| Kethleen Dorough v. One Hendred Ninetten Westers, LLC, et al |
|
Norman, Oklahoma, personal injury lawyer represented the Defendant on a premises liability theory. |
| Ryan Corbridge v. Encompass Indemnity Company |
|
Portland, Oregon, insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on bad faith breach of contract theory. |
| Ira A. Troyer v. Maryland Casualty Company, et al. |
|
Missoula, Montana, insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory. |
| Meeka Elliott v. 3M Company, et al. |
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota, personal injury lawyers presented the Plaintiff who who on a product liability theory. |
| United States of America v. Robert Elwood Matthews |
|
Columbus, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance. |
| United States of America v. Bahadar Durrant |
|
Columbus, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States. |
| Bertha Brown v. Target Corporation |
|
Detroit, Michigan, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability claim. |
| Sage Architecture, Inc. v. Chris Lingle |
|
San Antonio, Texas, commercial litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a fraud claim. |
| Lynn K. Pierce v. Target Corporation |
|
Rochester, New York, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability claim. |
| United States of America v. Estate of Anthony Ray Lopez, Sr. v. City of Oontairo, et al. |
|
San Bernardino, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theory. |
| Jacob H. Sulzbach v. Kubota Tractor Corporation |
|
Sioux City, Iowa, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a product liability theory. |
| Mallani Ferrer v. Best Buy Co., Inc. |
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a produce liability claim. $1 (10-17-2025 - MN) |
| Cheryl Rsmussen v., et al. v. Springs Window Fashions. LLC, et. al. |
|
Salt Lake City, Utah, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on premises liability theories. $0 (10-09-2025 - UT) |
| Nasha Nelson v. Check City Partnership, LLC |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada, civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff and Defendant in a breach of contract case. |
| Gary L. Dotson v. Mendard, Inc. |
|
Rockford, Illinois, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff in a premises liability case. |
| Craig Kimmel v. iHeartmedia, Inc. |
|
San Antonio, Texas, consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment violation theory. |
| Patricia Patten v. Sanofi S.A., et al. |
|
New Orleans, Louisiana, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a product liability claim involving Taxotere (Docetaxel). $0 (10-03-2025 - lA) |
| Tillie Fentress v. Hospira Worldwide, Inc., et al. |
|
New Orleans, Louisiana, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory. |
|
Next Page |