Telecommunications Law
 
United States of America v. Alessandro Doreus, Jean Elie Doreus Jovin, and Djouman Doreus

Orlando, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with conspiracy to possess an unauthorized access device.

from at least 2015 through 2020, Jean Elie Doreus Jovin (34, of Loganville, GA.), Alessandro Doreus, (29, of Port St. Lucie, FL.), and Djouman Doreus (29, of North Miami, Fl., conspired to knowingly, and with intent to defraud, possess tens of thousands of count... More...
   $0 (05-11-2022 - FL)

State of Oklahoma v. Vernon Lee Shaver

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense attorney represented Defendant, charged with:

Count # 1. Count as Filed: DU2I, POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-401-B2
Date of Offense: 08/03/2019
Party Name Disposition Information
SHAVER, VERNON LEE Disposed: CONVICTION, 02/18/2022. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: POSSESSION OF CONTROL... More...
   $0 (02-18-2022 - OK)

United States of America v. Robert Rodriguez

Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense attorney represented defendant charged with selling controlled substances in violation of 18 U.S.C. §841

Rodriguez, age 58, was indicted for possession with intent to distribute fentanyl and possession of a firearm.

On August 10, 2020, FBI conducted a search of the defendant’s apartment in the 1300 block of W. 4th Street, Wilmington, Dela... More...
   $0 (02-09-2022 - DE)

United States of America v. Ilir Bregu

Boston, MA - Criminal defense lawyer represented defendant with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute oxycodone.



When evaluating the denial of a motion to suppress, we
present the facts as supportably found by the district court. See,
e.g., United States v. Pontoo, 666 F.3d 20, 24 (1... More...
   $0 (11-22-2021 - MA)

C.D. on behalf of T.D. v. Warren Hills Regional Board of Education

Trenton, New Jersey civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Handicapped Child Act violation theory.

Title 20 U.S.C. §1401. Definitions

Except as otherwise provided, in this chapter:
(1) Assistive technology device
(A) In general

The term "assistive technology device" means any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquir... More...
   $0 (10-29-2021 - NJ)

Carolyn Catalano v. Infinity Solar Systems, LLC

White Plains, New York consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiff, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, who sued Defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violation theory.

47 U.S.C. §227. Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
(a) Definitions

As used in this section—

(1) The term “automatic telephone dialing system” ... More...
   $0 (09-16-2021 - NY)

United States of America v. SALLY LÓPEZ MARTÍNEZ

Boston, MA - Criminal defense lawyer represented defendant with various federal
offenses relating to public corruption involving the awarding of contracts to entities affiliated with Hernández by ADL, AAA, and the Puerto Rico House of Representatives charges.



The following facts are not in dispute. In January of
... More...
   $0 (08-19-2021 - MA)

Bob Dawson, et al. v. Porch.com, Inc., et al.

Seattle, WA: Consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227) violations.

See: 47 U.S.C §227. Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
(a) Definitions

As used in this section—

(1) The term “automatic telephone dialing system” means equipment which has the capacity—

(A) to store or... More...
   $0 (08-17-2021 - WA)

Jay Winegard v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc., d/b/a The Wall Street Journal

Brooklyn, New York civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on n Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory.

42 U.S.C. 12101 provides:

"The Congress finds that—

(1) physical or mental disabilities in no way diminish a person's right to fully participate in all aspects of society, yet many people with physical or mental disabilities have been ... More...
   $0 (08-04-2021 - NY)

United States of America v. Nizar Farhat

Los Angeles, California criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant who was charged with bribery.

Nizar Farhat, 63, of Palm Desert, was charged with one count of being a public official who received an illegal gratuity and one count of being a public official who received compensation from a private party for government services.

Farhat is a former construction manage... More...
   $0 (07-16-2021 - CA)

Matthew Hufaus v. DoNoPay, Inc.

San Francisco, California consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theories under 47 U.S.C. 227, which provides:

(a) Definitions

As used in this section—

(1) The term “automatic telephone dialing system” means equipment which has the capacity—

(A) to store or produce telephone numbers ... More...
   $0 (06-24-2021 - CA)

STATE OF OHIO v. KEENA WILLIAMS

Cleveland, Ohio - Criminal defense attorney represented Kenna Williams with a 13-count indictment, charging him with aggravated burglary in specification and a repeat violent offender specification (Count 1); assault (Count 2); criminal damaging or endangering (Count 3); theft (Count 4); petty theft (Count 5); improperly discharging a firearm into a habitation ... More...   $0 (06-17-2021 - OH)

United States of America v. Leelynn Danielle Chytka

Abingdon, Virginia mail fraud and aggravated identity theft charge criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, Leelynn Danielle Chytka, age 31.

“In the midst of a global pandemic, this defendant conspired with others to defraud the Virginia Employment Commission of nearly $500,000 intended for Virginians in need,” Acting United States Attorney Bubar said today. “This was money se... More...
   $0 (06-14-2021 - VA)

STATE OF OHIO v. KENNETH RICHEY

Lima, OH - Criminal defense attorney represented Kenneth T. Richey with aggravated murder and aggravated arson charge.



{¶2} Randall Basinger (“Basinger”) worked as an assistant prosecutor in
Putnam County in between 1981 and 1987. Tr. 312. In 1986, Basinger became the
lead prosecutor in a case that resulted in Ri... More...
   $0 (06-06-2021 - OH)

David A. Barry v. Signify Health, L.L.C.

Dallas, Texas consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violation theory.

As used in this section—

(1) The term “automatic telephone dialing system” means equipment which has the capacity—

(A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and
... More...
   $0 (05-24-2021 - TX)

Britney Blackmon v. Tower Loan of Mississippi LLC, d/b/a Tower Loan

Tuscaloosa, Alabama pro se litigant sued Defendant on a Telecommunications Act of 1996 violation theory.... More...   $0 (05-21-2021 - AL)

State of Oklahoma v. HAMILTON, ADRIAN DUANE

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, charged with:

Count # 1. Count as Filed: LA3, UNAUTHORIZED USE OF A VEHICLE, in violation of 47 O.S. 4-102
Date of Offense: 10/13/2020
Party Name Disposition Information
HAMILTON, ADRIAN DUANE Disposed: DEFERRED, 05/18/2021. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: UNAUTHORIZED USE OF A VEHICLE(LA3)
Violation of... More...
   $0 (05-18-2021 - OK)

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. SARAH ELIZABETH CHARLES, Defendant.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, charged with:


Count # 1. Count as Filed: ODO, CONSPIRE/ATTEMPT TO DELIVER/MANUFACTURE/POSSESS CONTROLLED DRUGS, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-408
Date of Offense: 12/16/2019
Party Name Disposition Information
CHARLES, SARAH ELIZABETH Disposed: CONVICTION, 05/11/2021. Nolo Contendere Plea
Count as Disposed... More...
   $0 (05-11-2021 - ok)

Stewart Smith v. Independence Holding Company

New Haven, Connecticut consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory under 47 U.S.C. 227, which provides:

It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States—

(A) to make any call (other than a call made for emerg... More...
   $0 (05-10-2021 - CT)

Kelly Schultz v. TheMLSonline, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued TheMLSonline, Inc. on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory under 47 U.S.C. 227 which provides:

(a) Definitions

As used in this section—

(1) The term “automatic telephone dialing system” means equipment which has the capacity—

(A) to store or produce telephone numbe... More...
   $1 (05-07-2021 - MN)

STATE OF OHIO VS. SIERRA SMITH

Cincinnati, Ohio - Criminal defense attorney represented Sierra Smith with a telecommunications harassment charge



Prompted by jealousy, a relational turf war resulted in a
telecommunications harassment conviction after defendant-appellant Sierra Smith
launched a threatening Facebook message to her boyfriend’s ex. On a... More...
   $0 (05-02-2021 - OH)

STATE OF OHIO vs. KEVIN ROBERSON

Cincinnati, Ohio - Criminal defense attorney represented Kevin Roberson with appealing the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court’s judgment overruling his 2020 “Motion to Vacate Void Judicial Sanction.”



{¶2} In 2016, in the case numbered B-1505520, Roberson was convicted
upon guilty pleas to attempted felonious assault a... More...
   $0 (05-01-2021 - OH)

Bruce E. Katz, M.D., P.C. v. Focus Forard, L.L.C.

New York, New York consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff, Bruce E. Katz, M.D., P.C., d/b/a Juva Skin and Laser Center, a New York professional corporation, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons
doing business as Juva Skin and Laser Center, which sued Focus Forard, L.L.C. on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 violation theory.

47 U... More...
   $0 (04-13-2021 - NY)

STATE OF OHIO vs. CAMERON SMITH

Cincinnati, OH - Criminal defense attorney represented Cameron Smith with a telecommunications harassment charge.



On April 21, 2019, Cameron Smith was charged with
telecommunications harassment in violation of R.C. 2917.21(B). The complaint
charged Smith with violating R.C. 2917.21(B), but does not clarify whether i... More...
   $0 (03-25-2021 - OH)

United States of America v. Andrew Albert Comeaux

Minneapolis, Minnesota felony firearm possession criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, Andrew Albert Comeaux, age 38, who was charged with once count of felony in possession of a firearm.

According to COMEAUX’s guilty plea and documents filed with the court, on June 15, 2020, multiple law enforcement agencies executed a search warrant at COMEAUX’s residence. During the search... More...
   $0 (02-09-2021 - MN)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: