Trademark Law
 
United States of America v. Onur Aksoy

Trenton, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Traffickinh in Fraudulent and Counterfeit Cisco Networking Equipment


CEO of Dozens of Companies Sentenced to 78 Months in Prison for Massive Scheme to Traffic in Fraudulent and Counterfeit Cisco Network... More...
   $0 (05-02-2024 - NJ)

United States of America v. Onur Aksoy

Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Trafficking in Fraudulent and Counterfeit Cisco Networking Equipment


CEO of Dozens of Companies Sentenced to 78 Months in Prison for Massive Scheme to Traffic in Fraudulent and Counterfeit Cisco Networki... More...
   $0 (05-02-2024 - NJ)

Pink Floyd (1987) Limited v. The Owner and/or Operator of Floydology.com

Chicago, Illinois intellectual property law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114 violation theory.

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant— (a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution,... More...
   $0 (02-22-2024 - IL)

Steven A.W. De Jaray, et al. v. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation

Portland, Oregon intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under the Landham Act.

"The Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq., was enacted by Congress in 1946. The Act provides for a national system of trademark registration and protects the owner of a federally registered mark against the use of similar marks if su... More...
   $0 (02-16-2024 - OR)

Alana Marie Souza, et al. v. Brick House, Inc.

Eugene, Oregon intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a 15 U.S.C. 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) violation theory.

15 U.S.C. 1125 provides:

(1) Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any... More...
   $0 (12-10-2023 - OR)

United States of America v. Raynard Smith and Lanard

Charleston, South Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with selling of counterfeit goods.

Evidence presented to the Court showed that Raynard Smith, 42, and Lanard Smith, 42, of Summerville, operated store fronts and sold merchandise, to include sports jerseys, that had been imported from countries such as China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Germany, Italy, and Tai... More...
   $0 (11-27-2023 - NC)

United States of America v. Neil Cole

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with participating in a scheme to fraudulently inflate Iconix’s revenue and earnings per share, making false filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and misleading the conduct of audits.

In November 2022, a jury found COLE guilty following a four-week retrial before U.S. Distr... More...
   $0 (10-10-2023 - NY)

DP Creations v. Frank Li, d/b/a "Dollbie"

Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

DP Creations is a retain apparel and fashion company located in Bountiful, Utah.

Denise Pratt sculpted life-like newborn dolls as a hobby. Eventually her creations became so popular that Ms. Pratt and her husband, Nevin, organized DP Creations LLC (DPC)... More...
   $0 (08-18-2023 - UT)

Jose Ruiz v. Paramount Global, Inc.

New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

"Copyright infringement is the unauthorized use of copyrighted material. This can include things like copying, distributing, or performing copyrighted works without permission from the copyright holder.

Copyright infringement is a violation of the copy... More...
   $0 (08-08-2023 - NY)

Ajay Suresh v. Koyfin, Inc. and Rob Boris Koyfman

New York, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.

"Copyright infringement is the unauthorized use of copyrighted material. This can include things like copying, distributing, or performing copyrighted works without permission from the copyright holder.

Copyright infringement is a violation of the copyright... More...
   $0 (08-08-2023 - NY)

United States of America v. Anise Kachadourian

Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with purchasing prescription oncology medications under false pretenses to sell them for profit.

Anise Kachadourian, 55, of Towaco, New Jersey, a board-certified oncologist, pleaded guilty to an information charging her with unlawfully selling prescription cancer medication, which had been previously purchased usin... More...
   $0 (05-31-2023 - NJ)

United States of America v. Jerry Chris Van Dyke aka Jerry Witten

Seattle, Washington criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with violation of the Indian Arts and Crafts Act (IACA) by representing himself as a Native American artist, when he had no tribal enrollment or heritage.

The investigation of Jerry Van Dyke, age 67, from Seattle, began in February 2019, when the Indian Arts and Crafts Board received a complaint that Van Dyke was re... More...
   $0 (05-17-2023 - WA)

Michael W. Hayes, Jr. v. Transportation Insurance Company, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer sued Defendants on auto negligence and medical malpractice theories.


On October 10, 2018, plaintiff was injured when a tortfeasor stuck plaintiff's vehicle from behind. Dkt. # 2-1, at 2. Plaintiff's vehicle was owned by his employer, and plaintiff was operating it within the scope of his employment at the time of the incident. Id. Pl... More...
   $0 (05-16-2023 - OK)

Noah Lebowitz v. Harmoney Nutraceuticals, LLC

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114, which provides:

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, dis... More...
   $0 (04-26-2023 - OK)

Just Between Friends Franchise System, Inc. v. Samone Gibson Enterprises, LLC et al

Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff which sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory.

15 U.S.C. 1114 provides:

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution... More...
   $0 (03-29-2023 - OK)

Denise Trlica, et al. v. Entertainment Tonite, L.C.

Davenport, Iowa Lanham Act lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on Trademark Infringement Act violation theories claiming $940,000 in damages.

The Lanham Act also provides federal causes of action for trademark dilution, cybersquatting, and several unfair competition claims, such as unregistered trademark infringement (including claims for infringement of unregistered trade d... More...
   $0 (03-28-2023 - AZ)

Brave Law Firm, LLC v. Truck Accident Lawyers Group, Inc.

Wichita, Kansas intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff which sued defendant on a trademark infringement (Lanham Act) violation theory.





Federal Courthouse - Wichita, Kansas


Federal Courthouse - Wichita, Kansas


More...   $0 (03-21-2023 - KS)

United States of America v. Kevin Charles Kowalis







Federal Courthouse - San Antonio, Texas


Federal Courthouse - San Antonio, Texas


MoreLaw Legal News For San Antonio


More...   $0 (03-07-2023 - TX)

United States of America v. Lyle Justin Schirm

Portland, Oregon criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with shipping a handgun and ammunition to the United Kingdom and possessing a pound of meth in his residence.





Federal Courthouse - Porland, Oregon


Federal Courthouse - P... More...   $0 (02-17-2023 - OR)

Dexon Computer, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America

Minneapolis, Minnesota insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurane contract claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of Defendant's wrongful denial of its claim.





Fede... <a href=More...   $0 (02-16-2023 - MN)

Hermes v. Mason Rothchild

New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant on a Lanham Act violation trademark infringement theory claiming that Defendant's 'MetaBirkins' non-fungible tokens, handing Paris fashion house Hermes a victory in a closely watched dispute that could impact future conduct in the world of fashion and NFTs.





More...   $0 (02-07-2023 - NY)

Under Armour, Inc. v. Armorina, Inc.

Baltimore, Maryland intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1051.




MoreLaw Legal News For Baltimore





How are trademarks enfo... More...
   $0 (01-13-2023 - MD)

United States of America v. Neil Cole

New York City, New York criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with fraudulently inflate Iconix’s revenue and earnings per share, making false filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and misleading the conduct of audits.

“As a unanimous jury has now found, Neil Cole deceived his company’s investors and auditors in order to make his company ap... More...
   $0 (11-28-2022 - NY)

Pizza Inn, Inc. v. Fawzi Odetallah

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendant in a breach of franchise agreement dispute.

In 2007, Pizza Inn and Mr. Odetallah entered into a franchise agreement (“2007 Franchise Agreement”), granting Mr. Odetallah a non-exclusive license to use Pizza Inn's proprietary trademarks in connection with the restaurant located at 2224 North 14th Street... More...
   $0 (09-26-2022 - OK)

United States of America v. Costel Alecu

Akron, Ohio criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with his role in an international criminal network engaged in a wide-ranging online auction fraud scheme that targeted victims in the Northern District of Ohio and elsewhere in the United States.

From July 2008 through August 2020, Costel Alecu, age 38, of Bucharest, Rominia and codefendant Madalin Ghinea, 35, of Alexandria, Roman... More...
   $0 (09-12-2022 - OH)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: