Rowena Tachas; Monique Dereta v. Dana Sanders, et al. | |||
Las Cruces, New Mexico civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Sanders violated their First Amendment rights by threatening frivolous legal action against them in retaliation for their speech. |
|||
Katsy Mullendore Mecom Cluck v. Teague Ranch Company, LLC, et al. | |||
Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendant in a trademark dispute. ... More... $0 (11-12-2024 - OK) |
|||
Claudia Sampedro, et al. v. Ibiza Lounge, LLC, et al. | |||
|
|||
Richard Blair v. Automobili Lamborghini SpA | |||
|
|||
Ina Schnitzer v. Council Cafe, LLC | |||
|
|||
Trieu, LLC v. Phuc C. Nguyen, et al. | |||
... More... $0 (07-26-2024 - TX)
|
|||
United States of America v. Shane Burdue | |||
Ohio Man Sentenced for Trafficking Counterfeit Goods Shane Burdue, 46, of Toledo, Ohio, was sentenced to 14 months in prison... More... $0 (07-02-2024 - OH) |
|||
United States of America v. Onur Aksoy | |||
|
|||
United States of America v. Onur Aksoy | |||
|
|||
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited v. The Owner and/or Operator of Floydology.com | |||
Chicago, Illinois intellectual property law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114 violation theory. |
|||
Steven A.W. De Jaray, et al. v. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | |||
Portland, Oregon intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under the Landham Act. |
|||
Alana Marie Souza, et al. v. Brick House, Inc. | |||
Eugene, Oregon intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a 15 U.S.C. 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) violation theory. |
|||
United States of America v. Raynard Smith and Lanard | |||
Charleston, South Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with selling of counterfeit goods. |
|||
United States of America v. Neil Cole | |||
New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with participating in a scheme to fraudulently inflate Iconix’s revenue and earnings per share, making false filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and misleading the conduct of audits. |
|||
DP Creations v. Frank Li, d/b/a "Dollbie" | |||
Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
|||
Jose Ruiz v. Paramount Global, Inc. | |||
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
|||
Ajay Suresh v. Koyfin, Inc. and Rob Boris Koyfman | |||
New York, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
|||
United States of America v. Anise Kachadourian | |||
Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with purchasing prescription oncology medications under false pretenses to sell them for profit. |
|||
United States of America v. Jerry Chris Van Dyke aka Jerry Witten | |||
Seattle, Washington criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with violation of the Indian Arts and Crafts Act (IACA) by representing himself as a Native American artist, when he had no tribal enrollment or heritage. |
|||
Michael W. Hayes, Jr. v. Transportation Insurance Company, et al. | |||
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer sued Defendants on auto negligence and medical malpractice theories. |
|||
Noah Lebowitz v. Harmoney Nutraceuticals, LLC | |||
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114, which provides: |
|||
Just Between Friends Franchise System, Inc. v. Samone Gibson Enterprises, LLC et al | |||
Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff which sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory. |
|||
Denise Trlica, et al. v. Entertainment Tonite, L.C. | |||
Davenport, Iowa Lanham Act lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on Trademark Infringement Act violation theories claiming $940,000 in damages. |
|||
Brave Law Firm, LLC v. Truck Accident Lawyers Group, Inc. | |||
Wichita, Kansas intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff which sued defendant on a trademark infringement (Lanham Act) violation theory.
|