Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff and Defendants in a contract dispute.


¶2 In July of 2010, homeowners contracted with the appellee, Landmark Construction Group, Inc., (Landmark) to replace a hail-damaged roof on their home in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The homeowners were also in negotiations to sell the house to the appellant, Carl Fleig (Fle

Boston, Massachusetts personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful death negligence theory.

A person who (1) by his negligence causes the death of a person, or (2) by willful, wanton or reckless act causes the death of a person under such circumstances that the deceased could have recovered damages for personal injuries if his death had not resulted, or (3) ope

San Diego, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with International Trafficking of Counterfeit Apple Products.

International Trafficker of Counterfeit Apple Products Sentenced to Prison

San Diego, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with International Trafficker of Counterfeit Apple Products.

International Trafficker of Counterfeit Apple Products Sentenced to Prison

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

Colorado's product liability laws allow injured consumers to file lawsuits for defective products based on strict liability, negligence or breach of warranty.

Colorado product liability actions are based on negligence or strict liability and may include claims of design defec

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

There are three possible theories of liability in a product liability case: (1) strict liability, (2) breach
of warranty, and (3), negligence.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendant on product liability theories.

Products liability claims in Oklahoma can be based on three areas: negligence, strict liability, or a breach of warranty. If a product is defective due to the way it was designed or constructed, either the manufacturer, seller, or distributor is strictly liable f

Mobile, Alabama personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

"Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC develops, manufactures,, and markets pharmaceutical products. The Company was founded in 1950 and is located in Bridgewater, New Jersey. Areas that Sanofi US cover include cardiovascular disease, central nervous system ailments, and metabolic disorders." Bloom

Madison, Wisconsin personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory.

In Wisconsin, if a person believes he or she were injured due to a defective or unreasonably dangerous product, they may have a product liability claim. Product liability claims can be pled as negligence, strict liability, or breach of warranty actions.

Novo N

Boise, Idaho personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory.

Plaintiffs alleged that she was harmed when they took an anti-depressant drug known as Prozac, whose active ingredient is fluoxetine hydrochloride. Eli Lilly & Co. (Lilly), the sole defendant in all these actions, manufactured and marketed this drug, which is FDA-approved a

Lafayette, Indiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability
theory.

"Established in the early 1950’s from a market need to provide machine tools at affordable prices and do it quickly from a large inventory. Summit continues the tradition by delivering quality machine tools, spare parts and superior service to the world’s lar

Jackson, Mississippi criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendantssfor Conspiring to Steal USDA-Mortgaged Houses.

Sacramento, California consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued
the Defendant on a Magnuson -Moss Warranty Act violation theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages.

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is a federal law that regulates consumer product warranties in the United States. Here's a breakdown of its key elements:

Purpose:

To e

New York City, New York consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the defedants on a Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act theory.


Defendant B&G “manufactures, markets, and sells” spreads, jams, preserves, marmalades, and jellies under its Polaner brand. At issue in this case are statements on the packaging of Polaner's “All Fruit spreadable fruit” (the “Product”). The

Billings, Montana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories.

Montana's product liability law is a complex area with various nuances and recent changes. Here's a breakdown of key points:

Legal Theories:

Defective Product: A product is considered defective if it's unreasonably dangerous due to design, manufa

Kansas City, Missouri consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act Violations claiming $5 million in damages.

Plaintiffs were current and former owners or lessees of model year 2015-2019 Volkswagen vehicles equipped with the "Front Assist" feature ("Class Vehicles"). According to the Complaint, Volkswagen describes Front Assist as f

Boston, Massachusetts personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory.

"Sanofi US is comprised of four business units: Specialty Care, Vaccines, General Medicines, and Consumer Healthcare. Around the world, more than 100,000 people at Sanofi are dedicated to chasing the miracles of science to improve people’s lives."

Product

New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories.

"New York product liability law is based on a combination of negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty theories.

Negligence

To establish a negligence claim against a product manufacturer, a plaintiff must prove the following elements

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of the design, manufacture and/or sale of unreasonably dangerous product.


"Torax® Medical, Inc. is a privately held medical device company headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota, that develops and

Allentown, Pennsylvania consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act violation theory.

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA) is a federal law that governs consumer product warranties. The MMWA was enacted in 1975 to protect consumers from deceptive and unfair warranty practices.

The MMWA applies to all consumer products that

Seattle, Washington personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an elevator negligence theory.

"Washington elevator negligence law is based on the principle that elevator owners and operators have a duty to maintain their elevators in a safe condition and to warn passengers of any known dangers. If a person is injured in an elevator accident, they may be abl

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory.

This case was filed in the First Judicial District Court, D-101-CV-22-02361, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Dennis Murphy as Personal Representative of the Wrongful Death Estate of Mark Porter, deceased
estate of Mark Porter, dece

Grand Rapids, Michigan personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on product liability theories.

Michigan product liability law is based on the principle that manufacturers and sellers of products have a duty to produce and sell safe products. When a product is defective and causes injury to a consumer, the manufacturer or seller may be held liable for the d

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.


In this personal injury action, Plaintiff David Grasinger (“Grasinger”) alleges that he was injured by a spike tooth replacement part for a 336 Excavator which was defectively manufactured by Defendant, Caterpillar Inc. (“Caterpillar”) and brings clai

Galveston, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory.

Koki Holdings produces and sells a full line of HiKOKI power tools including lithium-ion battery-operated tools worldwide.

"Texas product liability law allows consumers to recover damages from manufacturers and sellers of defective products that cause injury or