Eugeme, Oregon personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

Plaintiff Nathan Mehl is a resident of Eugene, Oregon.

Plaintiff brought claims for strict products liability, negligence, breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, and for punitive damages. Defendant LG Chem moved to dismiss on the ground that this Court lacked

Beaufort, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on product liability and wrongful death theories.

This case was filed in the Beaufort County Court of Common Pleas, 2013-CP-07-00781, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.


Decedent John Harley Wickersham, Jr. (“Wickersham”) was a pharmacist with a histo

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories.

"Kansas product liability law is governed by the Kansas Product Liability Act (KPLA), which is found in Kansas Statutes Annotated (K.S.A.) Chapter 60, Article 33. The KPLA allows plaintiffs to bring product liability claims based on three theories: strict liability, neg

This lawsuit involves a dispute over the sale of hemp.[2] On November 22, 2019, Plaintiff Eric Thornton and Defendant Dutch Naturals Processing, LLC (“DNP”) signed a Bill of Sale for the purchase and sale of fifty-percent of hemp biomass (“the hemp”). A copy of the Bill of Sale is provided below:

INDUSTRIAL HEMP PRODUCT BILL OF SALE

THIS

Akron, Ohio personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability theory.

J.M. Smuckers Company manufactures and sells consumer products humans and animals.

"Ohio product liability law is a complex area of law that governs the liability of manufacturers, suppliers, and retailers for injuries caused by defective products. Ohio law recognizes three

Birmingham, Alabama consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants claiming wrongful conduct in the sale and purchased of an automobile including financing.

Examples of consumer fraud in the sale of automobiles:

"Fraud in the sale of automobiles is a common problem that can have serious consequences for consumers. Some of the most common types of auto dealer fra

West Palm Beach, Florida personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability theory.

This case was filed in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court, 50-02023-CA-006266-XXXX-MB and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

"Sunbeam Products is an American brand that has produced electric home appliances since 1910. Its products have included the Mi

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability theory.

This case was filed in the Swift County District Court, 76-CV-20-00443 and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Minnesota product liability law is a complex area of law that can be difficult to understand. Here is a brief overview of the law:

Boston, Massachusetts personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on product liability theories.


Plaintiff Amy Licht (“Plaintiff” or &ldquo ;Licht”) brings the instant action against Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., and Organon, LLC (collectively, “Merck” or “Defendants”) for claims arising fr

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a negligence theory.


This case stems from an injury caused by the 3-Hydro-IX Grinder (“Grinder”), a machine manufactured by Defendant JWC Environmental, Inc. (“JWC”). Earlier versions of the Grinder were primarily used at wastewater treatment facilities. By shredding â�

Houston, Texas consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on a Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act theory under 15 U.S.C. 2301.

New York, New York personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability theory.


Plaintiff, Deborah Brown, brings this putative class action against Defendant, Coty, Inc. (“Coty”), alleging violations of the New York Consumer Law for Deceptive Acts and Practices, N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law §§ 349 and 350, breach of an express warranty, breac

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on product liability theories.


This diversity jurisdiction action involved claims for strict product liability, negligence, breach of express warranty, and breach of implied warranty associated with two medical devices manufactured by Defendants and used together to treat diabetes: the Medtronic

Columbus, Ohio personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on product liability theories.


Plaintiff Aaron Stinson and Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc. filed various MILs to exclude evidence in this case. Now before the Court are (A) Plaintiff's MIL No. 2 to Exclude Evidence or Argument Concerning the Reason for Warnings on Any Material Safety Data Sheet

Austin, Texas consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act theory.

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA) is a federal law that governs consumer product warranties in the United States. The law was enacted in 1975 to protect consumers from unfair or deceptive warranty practices.

The MMWA applies to written warranties that are offered

Oakland, California consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued defendants on breach of contract theory.


The complaint contains the following allegations.[1] On July 18, 2022, Lemke-Vega purchased a used 2019 Mercedes-Benz A220 (“the vehicle”) from Mercedes-Benz of Walnut Creek, an MBUSA-authorized dealership and repair facility. Compl. ¶¶ 8, 17. The total

St. Louis, Missouri consumer fraud lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act along with other Missouri statutory and common law claims.

Defendant manufactures, packages, distributes, and sells organic Tropical Treat Bunny Fruit Snacks (the “fruit snacks”). Defendant packages and sells them in an opaque, “heav

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyer sued Defendants on negligence and breach of fiduciary theories claiming that Navarro-a medical assistant at Planned Parenthood-had publicized Aguila's private health information and that Planned Parenthood was vicariously liable for Navarro's actions. Aguila also made direct claims against Planned Parenthood for negligent hiring, training, and supervisio

Memphis, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of an express warranty theory.

Plaintiff claimed that he purchased a new GMC Acadia from Defendant for $30,2709 in 2017.

Plaintiff alleges that she began to experience a Shift-to-Park (“STP”) defect shortly after she purchased the subject vehicle. (ECF No. 75-2 ¶ 12; EC

San Jose, California criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiring to defraud Apple, Inc., of millions of dollars and for related tax crimes.

Dhirendra Prasad, age 55, from Mountain House in San Joaquin County, was charged by Information with one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (Count One); two counts of

Montgomery, Alabama personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Barbour County, Alabama, 69-CV-22-900051.00, and was removed to federal court by Defendant.

On September 30, 2022, Plaintiff Linda Williams (“Williams”) filed this class action complaint in Barbour C

East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on product liability theories.

Abbot Laboratories manufactures and sells cardiovascular, diabetes care, medical diagnostic, neuromodulation, nutrition products and medicines.

"Product liability law in Illinois is a complex area of law that governs the liability of manufacturers, sellers, an

Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on product liability theories.

Allegation in a petition or complaint that a produce is defective and unreasonably dangerous are not proof of defect.

Hart Consumer Products Inc. sells battery powered lawn, garden and hand tools.

Techtronic Cordless GP and Techtronic Industries North America, In

Roanoke, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability theory.

"Product liability law in Virginia is a complex area of law that deals with the legal responsibility of manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers for defective products that injure those using the products after they enter the marketplace.

There are three main theories

Cincinnati, Ohio personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on product liability theories.

Plaintiff brought this action for personal injuries suffered by him after being implanted with an Inferior Vena Cava )"IVC" filter medical device manufactured by Bard.

C. R. Bard, Inc. is a leading multinational developer, manufacturer, and marketer of innovative, life