IIG Wireless, Inc. v. John Yi and Lauren Kim |
The parties appeal and cross-appeal a judgment after a jury trial in this |
United States of America v. Karen D'Onofrio v. Vacation Publications, Inc. d/b/a Vacations To Go Southern District of Texas Courthouse - Houston, Texas |
In this employment dispute, Karen D’Onofrio sued her former employer, |
Joel D. Kettler v. Leslie Gould |
Cross-defendants Leslie Gould and his wife Susan Gould |
STATE OF KANSAS v. LUKE REED |
In 1982, a jury convicted Reed of one count of aggravated kidnapping and one count of rape. The district court sentenced Reed to 15 years to life imprisonment for the rape charge and life imprisonment for the aggravated kidnapping charge, with the sentences to run consecutively. |
ESTATE OF WAYNE KENNETH DUCHENEAUX vs. DOUGLAS D. DUCHENEAUX SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA |
A detailed summary of the facts underlying this case are outlined in Estate of Ducheneaux v. Ducheneaux, 2015 S.D. 11, 861 N.W.2d 519. Wayne Ducheneaux died testate on November 18, 2011, leaving six children. On January 6, 2009, Wayne executed a will dividing his estate equally among his five |
Rodeo Citizens Association v. County of Contra Costa, Phillips 66 Company, Real Party in Interest Contra Costa County Courthouses - Martinez, California |
The County of Contra Costa (the county) certified an environmental impact report |
Jodelle L. Kirk v. Schaeffer Group USA, Inc.; FAG Bearings, LLC |
From 1973 to 1982, FAG Bearings Corporation released thousands of gallons |
Metlife Life and Annuity Company v. Connecticut v. Uzo Akpele, J.E.A., et al. Northern District of Georgia Federal Courthouse - Atlanta, Georgia |
Plaintiff MetLife Life and Annuity Co. of Connecticut (“MetLife”) initiated this interpleader action under Rule 22 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and sought to pay into the registry of the district court the proceeds of an insurance policy on the life of Dr. Ignatius Akpele, deceased. The defendants named by MetLife were Uzo Akpele (the widow of Dr. Akpele), J.E.A. (a minor child of Dr. A... More... $0 (03-29-2018 - GA) |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARK STUART LANDERSMAN, a/k/a Mark Stuart UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEE HALL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT |
We recount the facts in the light most favorable to the Government, the prevailing |
Covina Residents for Responsible Development v. City of Covina, City Ventures, Inc. Real Parties in Interest |
In this CEQA1 action Covina Residents for Responsible |
Eleanor Licensing, LLC v. Classic Recreations, LLC |
Following a four-day bench trial, the court entered |
United States of America v. Sharon Ramos Federal Courthouse - South Bend, Indiana |
South Bend, IN - Former Social Security Employee Sentenced |
United States of America v. Antonio Laregus Robertson Western District of Missouri Federal Courthouse - Kansas City, Missouri |
A jury convicted Antonio Robertson of conspiracy to possess and distribute |
United States of America v. Michael Harrington Southern District of New York - New York, New York |
New York, NY - Former NYPD Deputy Chief Pleads Guilty To Illegally Diverting Police Resources |
United States of America v. Michael Harrington Southern District of New York - New York, New York |
New York, NY - Former NYPD Deputy Chief Pleads Guilty To Illegally Diverting Police Resources |
Riverview Park Estates, LLC v. Imperial Investments, LLC, Stephen C. Pereff, Inc., Michael J. King, S. Gregory Pittman, Winters, King and Associates, Inc. MoreLaw Suites Legal Suites and Virtual Offices In Downtown Tulsa 406 South Boulder and 624 South Denver 918-582-3993 or Info@morelaw.com |
Tulsa, OK - Riverview Park Estates, LLC sued Imperial Investments, LLC, Stephen C. Pereff, Inc., Michael J. King, S. Gregory Pittman, Winters, King and Associates, Inc. seeking injunctive relief. |
Marjo Alberto Lopez Garza v. Citigroup, Inc. District of Delaware Federal Courthouse - Wilmington, Deleware |
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(d), a district court may order a plaintiff who voluntarily dismisses an action |
San Francisco Apartment Association v. City and County of San Francisco |
To reduce the number of no-fault evictions of families with children and educators |
E.W. v. Rosemary Dolgos and WICOMICO County Sheriff's Department District of Maryland Federal Courthouse - Baltimore, Maryland |
This matter involves a school resource officer’s decision to handcuff a calm, compliant elementary school student for fighting with another student three days prior. The child brought a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for excessive use of force in violation of the Fourth Amendment and several state law claims. On a motion for summary judgment, the district court concluded that the officer’s conduct d... More... $0 (02-14-2018 - MD) |
Mariusz Bogdanski v. Daman Budzik v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. Union County Courthouse - Niobara, Wyoming |
[¶1] Mariusz Bogdanski and Damian Budzik were codrivers of a commercial semitruck |
United States of America v. Oraleigh Jaramillo, a/k/a Oraleight Hammond, Classia Rose Hammond, Loia K. House, Dannell Jonah Lee, Kevin Ryan Lee, Myreon Lehi, Ladelda Lopez, a/k/a Ladeid Vox, Jennifer Ann Pioche District of Colorado Federal Courthouse - Denver, Colorado |
Denver, CO - Eight Individuals with Ute Mountain Ute Tribe Plead Guilty to Embezzlement and Money Laundering |
San Francisco Apartment Association v. City and County of San Francisco |
We must determine whether a San Francisco city |
Visalia Retail, LP v. City of Visalia |
This appeal involves a challenge to an update of the City of Visalia’s (Visalia) |
Toll Processing Services, LLC v. Kastalon, Inc. and Pastalon Polyurethane Products Northern District of Illinois Courthouse - Chicago, Illinois |
Toll Processing Services, LLC (“Toll Processing”) appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Kastalon, Inc. and Kastalon |
United States of America v. Kenneth E. Fairley Southern District of Mississippi - Federal Courthouse - Jackson, Mississippi |
Appellant-Defendant Kenneth Fairley appeals his jury conviction for theft of government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 (counts two and three) and conspiracy to commit theft of government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (count one). Fairley argues that: (1) the indictment, jury instruction, and verdict form all misstated the elements of § 641; (2) the district court erroneously a... More... $0 (01-25-2018 - MS) |
Next Page |