Nashville, Tennessee civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendant on a job discrimination race theory.... More...   $1 (01-11-2024 - TN)

Chicago, Illinois civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a job discrimination theory because of his race.... More...   $1 (01-09-2024 - IL)

Oxford, Mississippi personal injury lawyer presented the Plaintiff who sued the defendants for wrongful termination.

Quilton McGee filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi against Felder Services, LLC, and Lafayette LTC, Inc dba Oxford Health and Rehabilitation. Doc. #1. The complaint contains four counts: (1) “ Count I: Sex Discrimi... More...   $1 (01-05-2024 - MS)

Wichita, Kansas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in several areas, including employment, transportation, public accommodations, communications and access to state and local government' programs and s... More...   $1 (01-04-2024 - KS)

Chicago, Illinois civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a employment discrimination theory.

... More...   $0 (01-04-2024 - IL)

Fort Wayne, Indiana civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a civil rights violation theory claimed to have been discriminated against at work.

The complaint, over alleged race-based employment discrimination, was filed by Close & Hitchcock on behalf of Kamal Eley.

This case was filed in the Allen Superior Court, 02D01-2211-CT-000580, and was ... More...   $1 (01-04-2024 - IN)

Las Cruces, New Mexico civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an Americans with Disabilities - employment violation theory.

This case was filed in the Third Judicial District Court, D-307-CV-23-00315, and was removed to federal court by Allstate Insurance Company.

The ADA only prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability. It makes it unlawful to refuse ... More...   $1 (01-02-2024 - )

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment) theories under 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., which make it unlawful for a private employer or a state or local government “to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, ... More...   $1 (01-02-2024 - OK)

Columbus, Ohio employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on employment discrimination theories.

Sobremesa Hospitality Management, LLC is a group dedicated to developing brands and concepts that are guest centric, community focused, and value driven.
... More...   $1 (01-02-2024 - OH)

Scranton, Pennsylvania civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on "excessive force, disability discrimination, and related state-law claims.


Timko is a 48-year-old resident of Hemlock Township, Pennsylvania, who suffers from epilepsy disorder. Due to his medical condition, Timko is prone to epileptic seizures that sometimes cause him to lose consciousne... More...   $0 (12-29-2023 - PA)

Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an employment discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e which deals with employment discrimination law in the United States. It's also known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. To give you the most accurate information, I need some context about what specific aspect of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e you're in... More...   $0 (12-27-2023 - OK)

Wilmington, Delaware civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory claiming to have suffered $106,000 in damages.

"
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Building a Level Playing Field

The ADA is a landmark civil rights law in the United States that prohibits discrimination against individuals ... More...   $0 (12-20-2023 - DE)

Knoxville, Tennessee civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Employment Discrimination theory.

28 U.S.C. § 1331: Federal Question Jurisdiction
Image of Gavel and Statue of Justice Opens in a new window
www.pinterest.com
Gavel and Statue of Justice

This statute grants federal courts original jurisdiction over all civil actions arisi... More...   $1 (12-18-2023 - TN)

New York, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Job Discrimination (Age) aget theory.


CareRite Centers, a dynamic and fast growing rehabilitation and healthcare company, has successfully developed premier Rehabilitation and Nursing Centers.

Age discrimination in employment is illegal in the United States and is protected by the ... More...   $0 (12-15-2023 - NY)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disability Act Violation theory.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in several areas, including employment, transportation, public accommodations, communications and access to state and local government' programs... More...   $1 (12-13-2023 - OK)

Las Vegas, Nevada civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a job discrimination theory.... More...   $1 (12-08-2023 - NV)

Tacoma, Washington civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race) race theory.

"Job discrimination based on race or color is illegal in the United States. Federal, state, and local laws protect individuals from discrimination in all aspects of employment, including:

Hiring and firing: Employers cannot base hiring o... More...   $0 (12-08-2023 - WA)

Kansas City, Missouri employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, 2316-CV16717, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

"Employment discrimination laws seek to prevent discrimination based on race, sex, sexual orientation, religion, national origin, physica... More...   $0 (12-07-2023 - MO)

Detroit, Michigan civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a 29 U.S.C. 621 Job Discrimination (Age) violation theory.


On May 26, 2020, Plaintiff Zelma Motley filed a complaint alleging claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (“MELCRA”), and the Michigan Persons with Disabilities Civ... More...   $0 (12-07-2023 - MI)

Tyler, Texas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) theory.... More...   $1 (12-05-2023 - TX)

Lubbock, Texas employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights employment job discrimination theory.

?A motion to compel arbitration is a legal motion filed in court that requests a judge to order the parties to a dispute to arbitrate their claims rather than litigate them in court. Arbitration is a private dispute resolution process that is typical... More...   $0 (12-04-2023 - TX)

Baltimore, Maryland employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a civil rights discrimination theory under 5 u.S.C. 7703.

(a)
(1) Any employee or applicant for employment adversely affected or aggrieved by a final order or decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board may obtain judicial review of the order or decision.
(2) The Board shall be named r... More...   $0 (12-04-2023 - MD)

Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a job discrimination (age) civil rights violation theory.... More...   $0 (12-04-2023 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) theories.


Plaintiff Carmen Hampleman (Plaintiff) was a female employee of Defendants from roughly May 2019 until July 30, 2020. During that time, Plaintiff states that she held the Director of Marketing position for Defendants and also acted as a consultan... More...   $1 (11-29-2023 - OK)