Janes Doe v. Red Roof Inns, Inc., et al. |
Toledo, Ohio personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Victims Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, etc. |
TERESA BURGI, INDIVIDUALLY AND TERESA BURGI, AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR K.B. v. EAST WINDS COURT, INC. v. RONALD PASMAN, Third-Party Defendant |
|
Kennard Harrison v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al. |
New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a result of an accident. |
JULIE GODBE, DAVID GODBE v. CITY OF RAPID CITY |
|
Custom Pro Logistics, L.L.C. v. Penn Logistics, L.L.C. |
|
Carolyn Noel Manes v. Pamela Jo Hull |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Defendant's failure to exercise due care in the operation of her car |
Briona N. Cochran v. Sarah Beth Spohn and Seqyoyah Enterprises, Inc. |
Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle collision. |
Charlotte A. Howard and James G. Howard v. City of Elizabethtown, Kentucky, et al. l. |
Elizabethtown, Kentucky personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on general negligence theories. |
Cleetus Despanza v. Capital Motor Lines, et al. |
New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries in a motor vehicle accident. |
Felix Smith Borges v. Dilshod Y. Abdurasulov, et al. |
Monroe, Louisiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries in a motor vehicle accident. |
Stephen Sutton v. Todd C. Roberts |
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by Defendant's failure to exercise due care in the operation of his car |
Jerry M. Keepers, M.D., et al. v. Michael Smith and Valerie Smith |
Houston, Texas personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on medical malpractice negligence theories. |
Terrill Leroy Knox v. Daniel James Fonk |
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of his motor vehicle. |
Sally Sullivan v. City of Tulsa and Tulsa Metropolitan Utility Authority |
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on governmental tort claims negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a her home being flood with raw sewage on July 8, 2019. ... More... $0 (06-30-2022 - OK) |
Charlies Saenz v. Cinthia Portanova |
Guthrie, Oklahoma personal injury dog bite lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of being bitten by Defendant's dog. |
DANA SETTERS, and CRAIG SETTERS vs. ABUBAKAR ATIQ DURRANI, M.D., and THE CENTER FOR ADVANCED SPINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
|
ROBERT G. O’BRIEN, and CHERYL O’BRIEN vs. GREAT PARKS OF HAMILTON COUNTY, and HUMANA, et al., |
|
WSB REHABILITATION SERVICES., INC., vs. CENTRAL ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS, INC, and C. MICAH RAND, INC., d.b.a BROOKWOOD RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, RAND LOVELAND LLC, d.b.a. LOVELAND HEALTHCARE NURSING AND REAHAB CENTER EVAN GRAY, LLC, d.b.a. FLORENCE PARK NURSING & REHAB CENTER MICAH CLOVERNOOK, LLC, d.b.a. CLOVERNOOK HEALTH CARE PAVILION and CRYSTALWOOD, INC., d.b.a. THE ALOIS ALZHEIMER CENTER |
|
Heather M. Striplin v. Richard R. Snow |
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of his motor vehicle. |
Margie E. Hanson and Jeff Hanson v. Kimberly Newman |
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care in the operation of his motor vehicle. |
Charles Murray v. Manorcare of Topeka, KS, LLC |
Kansas City, Kansas personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued defendants on medical malpractice negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the death of Lula Robertson. |
Jane Doe v. WW Healthcare, LLC, d/b/a Princeton Place, et al. |
Santa Fe, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on negligence theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of being sexually assaulted by a coworker. |
Eiman Shekarchi, et al. v. Joseph S. Fischbach, et al. |
Los Angeles, California personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on professional negligence theories. |
Terrell P. Fadley v. Encompass Health Valley of the Sun Rehabilitation Hospital |
Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on abuse, neglect and exploitation theories under the Arizona Adult Protective Services Act ("SPSA"). |
Patricia Kappes v. Diana Rhodes and Rhodes Law Firm |
Cheyenne, Wyoming personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a professional negligence theory. |
Next Page |