Mountainside, New Jersey personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

New Jersey premises liability law holds property owners responsible for maintaining safe conditions on their property for lawful visitors. If a property owner's negligence leads to injury due to a dangerous condition, they can be held liable for damages. This incl

Shresbury, New Jersey personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability case.

This case was filed in the SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, MONMOUTH COUNTY, MON L 001450 25, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

In New Jersey, premises liability law holds property owners and those in control of property responsible for injuries sustained on their pr

Salt Lake City, Utah criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant who was charged with:

18:371 CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES; 18:981(a)(l)(C) and 28:2461 Intent to Seek Forfeiture
(1ss)
18:371 and 641 CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES Conspiracy to Convert, Sell, Convey, and Dispose of Government Property; 18:981(a)(l)(C) and 28:2461 Intent to Seek Forfeit

Jackson, MS criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of more than two but less than ten grams of methamphetamine

Great Falls, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute meth.

21 U.S.C. 841 provides:

(a) Unlawful actsExcept as authorized by this subchapter, it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally—
(1) to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or disp

Great Falls, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud.

18 U.S.C. § 1343, the federal wire fraud statute, defines and criminalizes the use of interstate or foreign wire communications to execute a scheme intended to defraud someone of money or property. Essentially, it's a form of fraud that leverages electronic communication for deceptive purposes

Billings, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud.

18 U.S.C. 1343 provides:

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or televisi

Olathe, Kansas personal injury lawyers reprsented the Plaintiff on a sexual abuse case.

In August 2021, A.S. filed a petition for damages and alleged that she was sexually abused as a child by Robert Bloom, her former youth pastor at Vineyard Church of Overland Park (VCOP). In addition to Bloom, A.S. named VCOP, Vineyard USA (VUSA), and Mark Warner as defendants in her claims of negligen

Macon, Georgia employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.

Scott, a Black woman, filed her initial pro se complaint against her employer, Macon-Bibb County, pursuant to Title VII and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 for race discrimination. Scott later retained counsel, and without seeking leave of the court, filed her first amended complaint which a

Orlando, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 use of unreasonable force in violation of the Fourth Amendment theory.

On the evening of April 26, 2016, Heid, his wife, and their
roommate were drinking alcohol at their home. Heid’s daughter
and stepson were also at the home. Around 9:00 PM, Heid and his
wife go

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Count as Filed: DI6AM, DUI ALCOHOL - SECOND OFFENSE (MUNICIPAL ARREST), in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A2)
Date of Offense: 12/03/2024
RAINWATER, YVONNE MICHELLE
Disposed: CONVICTION, 07/08/2025. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: DUI ALCOHOL - SECOND OFFENSE (MUNICIPAL ARREST)(DI6AM)
Violat

Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Illegal Reentry
Salvadoran National Pleads Guilty to Illegal Reentry

Fargo, North Dakota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on multiple wrongful death claims.

On June 29, 2013, a Canadian Pacific train carrying crude oil left New Town,
North Dakota, bound for an oil refinery in New Brunswick, Canada. World Fuel
Entities (“WFE”) was the shipper. Canadian Pacific transported the cars as far as
Quebec and then turned them over t

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on a civil rights violation claim.

On September 1, 2016, law enforcement officers conducted narcotics raids1
at a home and shop located on the same piece of property in Pulaski County,
Arkansas. Officers found contraband in both locations, and, during the raid of the
shop, an officer shot and injured a ma

Granite City, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence claims.

This case was filed in the Circuit County, Madison County, Illinois, 2025LA168, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

* * *

In Illinois, a negligence claim requires proving four elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Duty refers to the legal obligation a

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Governmental Tort Claim Act auto negligence claims.

COMES NOW Plaintiff, Kevin Hahn, and for his cause of action against the Defendants,
Norman Police Department (herein after "Defendant Police Department") and City of Norman,
alleges and states:
THE PARTIES
1. Plaintifl: Kevin Hahn, was a citize

El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence claim.

COME NOW PEDI HOPKINS, Plaintiff, files this Original Petition complaining of
Defendants SJFITZJARRELL CONSTRUCTION, SJ FITZJARRELL LLC, SJ FITZJARRELL
INNOVATIVE CONSTRUCTION ("Defendants") and JOSHUA HARLEY FITZJARRELL
("Joshua"), and for cause of action would respectfully show th

Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence claim.

This case was filed in the County Court at Law No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas, CC-23-06164-B, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

In Texas, auto negligence law dictates that drivers have a duty to operate their vehicles safely and responsibly, adhering to traffic laws and exe

Lubbock, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

CONSPIRACY TO TRANSPORT AN UNDOCUMENTED ALIEN WITHIN THE UNITED STATES

* * *

8 U.S.C. § 1324, also known as the "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" law, is a federal statute that criminalizes various activities related to the entry and presence of unauthorized immigrants in the United

Lubbock, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with transportation of illegal aliens.

8 U.S.C. § 1324, also known as the "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" law, is a federal statute that criminalizes various activities related to the entry and presence of unauthorized immigrants in the United States. It prohibits actions like smuggling, transporting, con

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with racketeering, wire fraud, money laundering, and Truth-In-Lending Act (“TILA”) offenses.

* * *

Legal issue Can the government obtain clear title to forfeited substitute assets following a criminal conviction and resolution of all third-party claims?
Headnote

CRIMINAL LAW. FORFE

Dallas, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Possession with the Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance, Aiding and Abetting

Possession with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances: A Summary

Possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance is a serious offense that can carry severe penalties under both federal and state laws. It

San Antonio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cyberstalking and making threats of injury in interstate communications.

Steven Daniel Weste was convicted for cyberstalking and sending threatening interstate communications.He filed a motion to suppress, contending that the warrantless search of his cell phone while in a halfway house violated the Fourth A

Rockville, Maryland family law lawyers represented the parties in divorce.

The parties were married on August 18, 2001. At the time of the trial in 2023, Wife was 55 years old, and Husband was 57 years old.

Four children were born as a result of the marriage. At the time of the trial, the oldest child (born in 2003) was a college student. The second child was born in 2005, the t

Richmond, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violating a protective order.

On November 24, 2018, L.M. obtained a permanent protective order against appellant, with whom she had a young son. The protective order prohibited appellant from having "contact of any kind with" L.M. except as permitted by a custody or visitation order and from "commit[ting] ac