Lincoln, Nebraska personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Federal Employer's Liability Act theory.

The Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), codified at 45 U.S.C.S. § 51-60, governs the right of railroad employees injured, sickened or killed in the course of their employment through an employer's negligence to sue the employer for damages.

Sioux Falls, South Dakota insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

"Kut and Kill Lawn Care has sued its insurance company after it informed the Sioux Falls company it wouldn't cover damages from more than 300 lawns that were chemically burned after an incorrect fertilizer application.

After a disastrous weed

Sioux Falls, South Dakota civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a breach of contract theory.

For the breach of an obligation arising from contract, the measure of damages, except where otherwise expressly provided by this code, is the amount which will compensate the party aggrieved for all the detriment proximately caused thereby, or which, in the o

Pierre, South Dakota personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

South Dakota has the “slight negligence” system in which the plaintiff may recover a proportionate fault share of his damages only so long as the trier of fact finds the plaintiff's negligence to be “slight” in comparison to the negligence of the

Kingfisher, Oklahoma oil and gas lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on seeking a declaratory judgment on how much royalty payments were due on an oil and gas lease on nine wells collectively called the Bernhardt Wells.

Devon filed its reply in support of summary judgment on July 6, 2020. Therein, Devon argued that any dispute over the status of the 1978 Lease as a n

Boise, Idaho civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming $136,000 in damages.

Contracts are breached in two primary ways, referred to as (1) and actual breach, and (2) an anticipatory breach. An actual breach occurs when one party to the agreement fails or refuses to honor his part of, or complete his duties under, the

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability law theory.

Globus Medical is a leading medical device manufacturer with the goal of improving the quality of life for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. We are inspired by the needs of these patients and by the surgeons and healthcare providers who treat them.

Great Falls, Montana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Montana is a Fault-Based Auto Accident State In effect, this means that the driver deemed at-fault for causing a crash should be held responsible for the damages and injuries. Fault arises based on negligence. A driver, truck company, vehicle manufacturer, o

Missoula, Montana insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on bad faith breach of insurance contract theories.

In order to establish a breach of contract claim against your insurance company, a plaintiff must prove the following three elements: The existence of a contract, A breach of 1 or more of the contract's terms by the insurer, and. Damages suffered a

Billings, Montana insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on bad faith breach of contract theories.

In order to establish a breach of contract claim against an insurance company, the Plaintiff must prove the following three elements: The existence of a contract, A breach of 1 or more of the contract's terms by the insurer, and. Damages suffered as a result

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.

A plaintiff in a personal injury case has to provide that he suffered an injury as a direct result of the Defendant or an agent or employ failing to exercise due care.

Oklahoma's comparative negligence statute includes a so-called “50-percent rule.” In Oklahoma, t

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyera represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

Oklahoma medical malpractice law has the same elements as any other negligence case but with additional requirements for the Plaintiff to prove to recover. The elements are, failure to exercise due care, causation, and damages.

Section 23-61.2 of t

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

A plaintiff in Oklahoma whose own negligence contributed to their injury, for instance, will have their damages reduced in proportion. And if the injured party was more negligent than the prospective defendant, he or she may not collect damages.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Stillwater, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a auto negligence theories.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Plaintiff claimed that he was injured in a car wreck that occurred in Lincoln County, Oklahoma on September 7, 2018.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation,

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Cheyenne, Wyoming personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

Contributory fault shall not bar recovery if fault is not more than 50% of the total fault of all actors. Damages diminished in proportion to the amount of fault attributable to claimant.

Cheyenne, Wyoming personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Wyoming does use modified comparative negligence statutes, which allow for shared fault. If you are less than 50 percent responsible, you can collect damages from the other driver (or, in most cases, their insurance company).

Casper, Wyoming personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant Federal Employer's Liability Act negligence theory.

The Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), codified at 45 U.S.C.S. § 51-60, governs the right of railroad employees injured, sickened or killed in the course of their employment through an employer's negligence to sue the employer for damages. 45 U.

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on medical malpractice negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Pulaski County Circuit Court, 60CV-20-00968, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

There is currently no cap on medical malpractice damages in Arkansas (including on compensation for things like pain