Salt Lake City, Utah criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant who was charged with:

18:371 CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES; 18:981(a)(l)(C) and 28:2461 Intent to Seek Forfeiture
(1ss)
18:371 and 641 CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES Conspiracy to Convert, Sell, Convey, and Dispose of Government Property; 18:981(a)(l)(C) and 28:2461 Intent to Seek Forfeit

Jackson, MS criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of more than two but less than ten grams of methamphetamine

Great Falls, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with using or possessing fraudulent immigration docuemtns in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1546, which provides:

he first paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) proscribes the forging, counterfeiting, altering or falsely making of certain immigration documents or their use, possession, or receipt. The second paragraph pros

Great Falls, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute meth.

21 U.S.C. 841 provides:

(a) Unlawful actsExcept as authorized by this subchapter, it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally—
(1) to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or disp

Great Falls, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud.

18 U.S.C. § 1343, the federal wire fraud statute, defines and criminalizes the use of interstate or foreign wire communications to execute a scheme intended to defraud someone of money or property. Essentially, it's a form of fraud that leverages electronic communication for deceptive purposes

Billings, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud.

18 U.S.C. 1343 provides:

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or televisi

Olathe, Kansas personal injury lawyers reprsented the Plaintiff on a sexual abuse case.

In August 2021, A.S. filed a petition for damages and alleged that she was sexually abused as a child by Robert Bloom, her former youth pastor at Vineyard Church of Overland Park (VCOP). In addition to Bloom, A.S. named VCOP, Vineyard USA (VUSA), and Mark Warner as defendants in her claims of negligen

Macon, Georgia employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.

Scott, a Black woman, filed her initial pro se complaint against her employer, Macon-Bibb County, pursuant to Title VII and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 for race discrimination. Scott later retained counsel, and without seeking leave of the court, filed her first amended complaint which a

Orlando, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 use of unreasonable force in violation of the Fourth Amendment theory.

On the evening of April 26, 2016, Heid, his wife, and their
roommate were drinking alcohol at their home. Heid’s daughter
and stepson were also at the home. Around 9:00 PM, Heid and his
wife go

Cordell, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Lewd or Indecent Acts to a Child Under Sixteen, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2018, § 1123.

2023 OK CR 1, 526 P.3d 46:

¶4 The challenged evidence here met all of the factors required for admissibility under 12 O.S.2011, § 2414. In Horn v. State, 2009 OK CR 7, ¶ 40, 204 P.3d 777, 786, we required

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Plaintiff who was charged with Count 1: Rape by Instrumentation (21 O.S.2001, § 1111) and Count 2: Lewd Molestation (21 O.S.Supp.2002, § 1123 ).

¶7 Sections 2413 and 2414 were taken, almost verbatim, from Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 414, which were promulgated over a decade ago. While these provisions are perhaps not models

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Count as Filed: DI6AM, DUI ALCOHOL - SECOND OFFENSE (MUNICIPAL ARREST), in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A2)
Date of Offense: 12/03/2024
RAINWATER, YVONNE MICHELLE
Disposed: CONVICTION, 07/08/2025. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: DUI ALCOHOL - SECOND OFFENSE (MUNICIPAL ARREST)(DI6AM)
Violat

Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with
Bergen County Woman Indicted for Destruction of Evidence in Connection with Federal Investigation of Her Husband’s Real Estate Investment Fraud Scheme

Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with racketeering
Members of the Marion Gardens Street Gang Sentenced to Multiple Life Sentences without the Possibility of Parole

Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Illegal Reentry
Salvadoran National Pleads Guilty to Illegal Reentry

Fargo, North Dakota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on multiple wrongful death claims.

On June 29, 2013, a Canadian Pacific train carrying crude oil left New Town,
North Dakota, bound for an oil refinery in New Brunswick, Canada. World Fuel
Entities (“WFE”) was the shipper. Canadian Pacific transported the cars as far as
Quebec and then turned them over t

Fayetteville, Arkansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with passport fraud.

October 2018, Pineda used a false identity to apply for a United States
passport. In support of her application, Pineda submitted an Arkansas driver’s
license, a birth certificate, and a social security number — all purporting to be A.E.,2
a citizen of the United States wh

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on a civil rights violation claim.

On September 1, 2016, law enforcement officers conducted narcotics raids1
at a home and shop located on the same piece of property in Pulaski County,
Arkansas. Officers found contraband in both locations, and, during the raid of the
shop, an officer shot and injured a ma

Granite City, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence claims.

This case was filed in the Circuit County, Madison County, Illinois, 2025LA168, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

* * *

In Illinois, a negligence claim requires proving four elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Duty refers to the legal obligation a

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Governmental Tort Claim Act auto negligence claims.

COMES NOW Plaintiff, Kevin Hahn, and for his cause of action against the Defendants,
Norman Police Department (herein after "Defendant Police Department") and City of Norman,
alleges and states:
THE PARTIES
1. Plaintifl: Kevin Hahn, was a citize

El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence claim.

COME NOW PEDI HOPKINS, Plaintiff, files this Original Petition complaining of
Defendants SJFITZJARRELL CONSTRUCTION, SJ FITZJARRELL LLC, SJ FITZJARRELL
INNOVATIVE CONSTRUCTION ("Defendants") and JOSHUA HARLEY FITZJARRELL
("Joshua"), and for cause of action would respectfully show th

Cleveland, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Receipt and Distribution of Visual Depictions of Real Minors Engaged in Sexually Explicit Conduct and Possession of Child Pornography.

In 2022, an Iowa Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force investigated the peer-to-peer file-sharing network BitTorrent and found Eloshway’s IP address associated with seve

Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence claim.

This case was filed in the County Court at Law No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas, CC-23-06164-B, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

In Texas, auto negligence law dictates that drivers have a duty to operate their vehicles safely and responsibly, adhering to traffic laws and exe

Lubbock, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

CONSPIRACY TO TRANSPORT AN UNDOCUMENTED ALIEN WITHIN THE UNITED STATES

* * *

8 U.S.C. § 1324, also known as the "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" law, is a federal statute that criminalizes various activities related to the entry and presence of unauthorized immigrants in the United

Lubbock, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with transportation of illegal aliens.

8 U.S.C. § 1324, also known as the "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" law, is a federal statute that criminalizes various activities related to the entry and presence of unauthorized immigrants in the United States. It prohibits actions like smuggling, transporting, con