Statute of Limitation Law
 
United States of America v. Marcos Monarrez-Mendoza

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violating the federal “Kingpin” statute for operating a continuing criminal enterprise

Mexican Man Pleads Guilty to Violating Federal Kingpin Statute and Money Laundering in Connection with Arizona-

More...   $0 (07-08-2025 - PA)

United States of America v. Dennis Birkley and Brian Fenner

Indianapolis, Indiana criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with fraud.

On January 31, 2023, a jury convicted Brian Fenner and Dennis Birkley of seventeen counts, all stemming from one overarching fraud.1 Like many fraud schemes, underlying the intricate machinations of this ploy is clear-cut malfeasance.

Under Indiana’s mechanic’s lien statute, an indiv

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - IN)

Antonio Lynn Fluker, jr. v. Ally Financial, Inc.

Detroit, Michigan consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory.

Antonio Lynn Fluker, Jr. allegee that Ally Financial called his cell phone hundreds of times, without his consent, while seeking to recover on a car loan debt. He also alleges that these calls were made using both a pre-recorded voice and an automatic telephon

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - OH)

United States of America v. Christopher Parrish

Amarillo, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Failure to Register as a Sex Offender.

The federal law concerning Failure to Register as a Sex Offender, primarily governed by
18 U.S.C. § 2250, focuses on individuals required to register under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA).

Key Points:


Who is requ

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - )

United States of America v. Antonio Tafolla, Jr.

Lubbock, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

CONSPIRACY TO TRANSPORT AN UNDOCUMENTED ALIEN WITHIN THE UNITED STATES

* * *

8 U.S.C. § 1324, also known as the "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" law, is a federal statute that criminalizes various activities related to the entry and presence of unauthorized immigrants in the United

More...   $0 (03-20-2025 - TX)

United States of America v. Robert Lee Delgado

Lubbock, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with transportation of illegal aliens.

8 U.S.C. § 1324, also known as the "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" law, is a federal statute that criminalizes various activities related to the entry and presence of unauthorized immigrants in the United States. It prohibits actions like smuggling, transporting, con

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - TX)

Kasi Sierra v. Collectech Diversified Inc and Equifax Information Services LLC

Lubbock, Texas consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory.

* * *

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law designed to protect consumers from abusive, unfair, and deceptive practices by debt collectors. It outlines what debt collectors can and cannot do when trying to collect debts. The FDCPA aim

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - TX)

United States of America v. Aleyda Medrano-Ramos

El Paso, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to transport aliens.

8 U.S.C. § 1324 outlines the federal crime of "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens." It addresses the illegal entry and presence of unauthorized aliens in the United States, making it a crime to bring them in, transport them, conceal them, or encourage their entry in violati

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - TX)

Commonwealth of Virginia v. Troy McGowan

Richmond, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violating a protective order.

On November 24, 2018, L.M. obtained a permanent protective order against appellant, with whom she had a young son. The protective order prohibited appellant from having "contact of any kind with" L.M. except as permitted by a custody or visitation order and from "commit[ting] ac

More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - VA)

John F. Johnson and Yolanda Johnson v. Town of Greece, et al.

Rochester, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a prisoner civil rights violation claim.

42 U.S.C. § 1983, often referred to as Section 1983, is a federal law that allows individuals to sue state and local government officials for civil rights violations. It's a crucial tool for holding these officials accountable when they violate a person's constitutional rights

More...   $1 (07-01-2025 - NY)

Gerald J. Kennedy, Jr. v. Rochester & Southern Railroad

Rochester, New York personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Railway Federal Employer's Liability Act negligence theory.

* * *

The Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) is a US federal law that provides compensation to railroad employees injured on the job due to their employer's negligence. Unlike typical workers' compensation, which is a n

More...   $1 (07-02-2025 - NY)

United States of America v. Cameron David Martin

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1349.

* * *

18 U.S.C. § 1349, which addresses Attempt and Conspiracy, makes it a federal crime to attempt or conspire to commit wire fraud. This means that if two or more people agree to carry out a fraudulent scheme involving electronic commu

More...   $0 (07-02-2025 - OK)

Michelle Hawkinson v. Chevron USA, Inc.

Las Cruces, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an negligence theory.

* * *

New Mexico operates under a "fault-based" or "tort" system for personal injury cases, meaning the person or entity responsible for causing the accident is liable for damages. New Mexico also employs a pure comparative negligence rule, meaning a plaintiff's damages can

More...   $0 (06-30-2025 - NM)

United States of America v. Tre Joseph Connor

Jefferson City, Missouri criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with bank robbery by force or violence, felony possession of a firearm, and felony transportation of a firearm.

* * *

Federal bank robbery, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2113, involves the taking or attempted taking of property from a bank by force, violence, or intimidation. This includes scenarios w

More...   $0 (06-27-2025 - MO)

United States of America v. J.T. Myore

Rapid City, South Dakota criminal defense lawyer represnted the Defendant charged with carjacking amd bramdosjomg a foredar, during a crime of violence.

* * *

Federal robbery and aiding and abetting laws, as defined under 18 U.S.C. § 2, hold individuals liable for the crimes of others if they assist in or encourage the commission of a federal offense. Essentially, anyone who aid

More...   $0 (06-27-2025 - SD)

Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Casa, Inc., et al. v.

Washington, DC - Civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff seeking enjoin President Trump’s Executive Order No. 14160. Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship, 90 Fed. Reg. 8449.

Universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable authority that
Congress has given to federal courts. The Court grants the Govern-
ment’s applications for a partial stay of the inju

More...   $0 (06-28-2025 - )

United States of America v. Paul D. Turner

Cleveland, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug trafficking, onspiracy to Possess with the Intent to Distribute Cocaine Base (Crack), Possession of a Firearm by Convicted Felon.

Paul Turner pleaded guilty to drug trafficking and firearms charges. Because he continued to sell cocaine while out on bond and refused to take responsibility for his violent p

More...   $0 (06-26-2025 - OH)

Robert Carbone v. Wulf Kaal, et al.

Columbus, Ohio personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a defamation claim.


Robert Carbone, who lives in Connecticut, sued two Swiss organizations and several individuals who live in California, Illinois, and Switzerland for defamation and other tortious conduct. Carbone was a member of the two Swiss organizations. He claims that the defendants used websites to publish de

More...   $0 (06-26-2025 - OH)

Shayla S. Davis, et al. v. Ahmed M. Adam and Kal Freight, Inc., et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence case.

* * *

In Oklahoma, truck accident claims are governed by fault-based rules with a modified comparative negligence standard. This means the party responsible for causing the accident is liable for damages, but if the injured party is also at fault, their compensation can be r

More...   $1 (06-25-2025 - OK)

United States of America v. Prit Patel

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud

* * *

8 U.S.C. § 1349, titled "Attempt and Conspiracy," makes it a federal crime to attempt or conspire to commit any offense under Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which includes wire fraud. This means that even if a wire fraud scheme is not fully s

More...   $0 (06-26-2025 - OK)

Alyssa Mann v. State of Oklahoma

Norman, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking expungement of criminal records.

¶6 "The right to expungement of criminal records is governed by statute." V.C.B. v. State, 2020 OK CIV APP 69, ¶6, 480 P.3d 919, 921 (citation omitted). To qualify for an expungement, Mann would have to fall within one of the fifteen categories in 22 O.S. Supp. 2019 §18(A). Mann

More...   $0 (03-23-2022 - OK)

Micayla Augustyn v. Wall Township Board of Education

Princeton, New Jersey civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a education law violation theory.

For all the years Augustyn attended Wall High School, she was eligible for and received special education services pursuant to an individualized education plan (IEP) that provided for a variety of accommodations, including additional time to complete tests and homework assignments wit

More...   $0 (06-23-2025 - NJ)

Clifford C. Bain v. City of Cheyenne and Edward Brookman

Cheyenne, Wyoming personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a governmental tort claimed negligence claim.

On November 5, 2021, a Cheyenne City Transit bus driven by Edward Brookman hit Mr. Bain, who was driving his motorcycle. Mr. Bain suffered extensive and permanent injuries as a result of the collision. On September 25, 2023, Mr. Bain submitted a governmental

More...   $250000 (06-23-2025 - WY)

United States of America v. Jean Morose Viliena

Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawful reentry of a deported alien

Honduran National Sentenced to Six Months in Prison for Illegal Reentry





Sponsored By
More...
   $0 (06-23-2025 - MA)

Elane Vega v. Walmart Stores East, L.P., et al.

Port Charlotte, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

* * *

Florida Premises liability law summary
Florida Premises Liability Law Summary:
1. General Principle:

Property owners in Florida have a legal duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition to prevent injuries to la

More...   $0 (06-20-2025 - FL)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher