New Haven, Connecticut civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1201, which provides, in part:

The Congress finds that—

(1) physical or mental disabilities in no way diminish a person's right to fully participate in all aspects of society, yet many people with physical or mental di... More...    $0 (04-16-2022 - CT)

Rutland, Vermont Civil Rights Job Discrimination Lawyer

Ferron Wamblod sued Roger Marcoux and Lamoille County Sheriff's Department on civil rights job discrmination (sex) theories under 42 U.S.C. 2000.... More...    $1 (12-29-2020 - CT)

New Have, Connecticut civil rights lawyer represented plaintiff, Juliann Gurge, who sued Wheels of Ct., inc. on an employment discrimination theory.... More...    $0 (12-12-2020 - CT)

New Haven, CT - The The United States sued Strand Theater claiming that it was violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) violation theory.

Strand Theater and the Government entered into a settlement resolving ADA complaint filed by an individual with disabilities alleging that the Strand Theater’s facility is not fully accessible for individuals with physical disabilities. The... More...    $0 (06-22-2020 - CT)

New Haven, CT - The United States of America sued Quality Inn Mystic-Groton on an Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) violation theory.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office has reached a settlement agreement with the Quality Inn Mystic-Groton in Stonington to resolve allegations that the hotel was not operating in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”).
... More...    $0 (06-02-2020 - CT)

New Haven, CT - Ricci Laterra sued GE Betz, Inc. and General Electric Company on job discrimination (age) theories.... More...    $0 (02-02-2018 - CT)

New Haven, CT - Curtis Pertillar sued Universal Protection Service, L.L.C. on a job discrimination theory.... More...    $0 (04-20-2018 - CT)

New Haven, CT - Peter Ernsky sued Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. on an employment discrimination.

03/16/2018 31 RESPONSE TO by Peter Ernsky filed by Peter Ernsky. (McMinn, Michael) (Entered: 03/16/2018)
03/16/2018 32 NOTICE by Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. re 27 Order,,,, Statement re Order to Show Cause (Curtin, Matthew) (Entered: 03/16/2018)
04/04/2018 33 ORDER. The Cour... More...    $0 (04-04-2018 - CT)

The plaintiffs‐appellants, Mr. and Mrs. P. (the “parents”), commenced this
action in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
(Bryant, J.) on behalf of themselves and their son, M.P., against the
defendants‐appellees, the West Hartford Board of Education (the “District” or
the “Board”) and two District officials in their official capacities,2 all... More...    $0 (04-02-2018 - CT)

1 Appeal by plaintiff from so much of a judgment of the United States
2 District Court for the District of Connecticut, Geoffrey W. Crawford, Judge, as granted
3 summary judgment dismissing his claims against defendant City of Hartford (the
4 "City"), brought principally under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for failing to supervise its police
5 officers with respect to appropriate use of force;... More...    $0 (03-13-2018 - CT)

New Haven, CT - U.S. Attorney's Office Settles ADA Case with North Canaan School District

Deirdre M. Daly, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, on October 27,l 2017 announced that the U.S. Attorney’s Office has reached an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) settlement with the North Canaan School District to ensure equal access for children with disabilities at the No... More...    $0 (11-02-2017 - CT)

Substitute information charging the defendant with two counts of the crime of threatening in the second degree and one count of the crime of breach of the peace in the second degree, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Tolland, geographical area number nineteen, and tried to the jury before Graham, J.; verdict and judgment of guilty of breach of the peace in the second degree... More...    $0 (07-07-2017 - CT)

. The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether a trial court’s purportedly improper exclusionofaprospectivejurorforcauseontheground that he was ‘‘not able to speak and understand the English language’’ within the meaning of General Statutes § 51-217 (a) (3) constitutes per se reversible error. The defendant, Jeffrey P. Gould, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming ... More...    $0 (09-07-2016 - CT)

After a trial to the court, the defendant, Aaron Brantley, was convicted of one count of bribery of a witness in violation of General Statutes § 53a-149. The defendant now appeals, claiming that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. At the conclusion of the defendant’s trial, the court, B.Fischer,J.,madethefollowingfindingsoffact:‘‘[T... More...    $0 (04-04-2016 - CT)

Harford, CT - Yosif Bakhit and Kiyada Miles sued Safety Marking on discrimination and hostile work environment theories.

Some Court Docket Entries:

03/05/2016 250 MOTION to Bifurcate by Safety Markings, Inc..Responses due by 3/26/2016 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support)(Brown, Dennis) (Entered: 03/05/2016)
03/08/2016 251 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Yosif Bakhi... More...    $1500000 (03-29-2016 - CT)

New Haven, CT - Meriden Hotel Agrees to Make Changes to Comply with Americans with Disabilities Act

The U.S. Attorney’s Office has reached a voluntary compliance agreement with the Comfort Inn & Suites of Meriden, Connecticut, to resolve allegations that the hotel was not being operated in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”).

Under federal law, pri... More...    $0 (08-26-2015 - CT)

Plaintiff‐appellant Aidan A. Smith appeals from a judgment of
the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
(Arterton, J.) dismissing his complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1)
and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because we
conclude that an affidavit attached as an exhibit to a complaint is not
a “written instrument” that is deemed part ... More...    $0 (07-22-2015 - CT)

2 The question in this case is whether a Connecticut rule restricting the
3 use of certain teeth‐whitening procedures to licenced dentists is unconstitutional
4 under the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses. Because we conclude that
5 there are any number of rational grounds for the rule, we affirm the judgment of
6 the District Court.
7 BACKGROUND
8 Under Connect... More...    $0 (07-17-2015 - CT)

Plaintiffs-appellees Daniel Golodner and Security Technology Systems (“STS�) brought
suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the City of New London (“the City�) and two City
officials, defendants-appellants Martin Berliner and Robert Myers (“Appellants�), retaliated
against Golodner for exercising his rights under the First Amendment when he filed an earlier
lawsuit ... More...    $0 (10-27-2014 - CT)

11 Plaintiffs�Appellees (the “plaintiffs�), two former and one
12 current female New Britain police officers, brought suit in the
13 United States District Court for the District of Connecticut against
14 the City of New Britain, its police department, the police union, and
15 five individual police supervisors under Title VII of the Civil Rights
16 Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.... More...    $0 (10-13-2014 - CT)

In this uncontested wrongful termination action, the plaintiff, Brian O’Toole, appeals from the trial court’s sua sponte dismissal of his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly dismissed his complaint because the court had (1) concurrent jurisdiction to decide his claim brought pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq., and (2) subje... More...    $0 (02-24-2014 - CT)

In a matter involving employment discrimination and First Amendment retaliation claims, Plaintiff-Appellant Edwin Garcia appeals from a September 27, 2011 final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Thompson, C.J.), granting summary judgment to the Defendants-Appellees. Garcia, a former sergeant with the City of Hartford Police Department (“Hartford PDâ€�)... More...    $0 (01-28-2013 - CT)

The plaintiff, Mireille Desrosiers, appeals from the partial summary judgment1 rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants Diageo North America, Inc. (Diageo) and Lawrence D. Levine.2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred in granting in part the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (1) on the claim alleging discrimination based on a perceived disability because it im... More...    $0 (08-21-2012 - CT)

The defendants, United Parcel Service, Inc., and Kevin Trudelle,1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Michael Tomick. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) denied their motions to direct and to set aside the verdict with respect to the plaintiff’s claims of negligent infliction of emotional distress and viol... More...    $0 (05-16-2012 - CT)

The plaintiff, Carmen I. Perez-Dickson, brought this action claiming that the defendants, the board of education of the city of Bridgeport (board), Henry R. Kelly, the former assistant superintendent of the Bridgeport public schools (school district), and Daniel Shamas,1 the former acting superintendent of the school district, disciplined her for exercising her rights guaranteed by the first amend... More...    $0 (05-01-2012 - CT)

The central issue presented by this appeal1 is whether General Statutes § 46a-81c (1)2 imposes liability on employers for failing to take reasonable steps to prevent their employees from being subjected to hostile work environments based on their sexual orientation. The plaintiff, Luis Patino, commenced this action against the defendant, his former employer, Birken Manufacturing Company, claiming... More...    $0 (05-15-2012 - CT)

The plaintiff, Richard Barry, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, the board of education of the city of New Britain, on the plaintiff’s claims of breach of the parties’ settlement agreement and breach of the parties’ employment contract. On appeal, the plaintiff argues that the court improperly determined that he was collaterally estopped ... More...    $0 (12-27-2011 - CT)

The plaintiff, John D. Watts, appeals, following our grant of his petition for certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which reversed the judgment of the trial court awarding the plaintiff damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress on the part of the defendant, Heather Chittenden. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the Appellate Court improperly reversed the judgme... More...    $0 (07-19-2011 - CT)