San Antonio, Texas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act) theory.

MoreLaw’s goal is to help people seeking legal assistance to find the best lawyers available to represent them in any county in the United States. Click the link above to see some lawyers available where this case was tried who might be available to represent you .Call ... More...   $0 (03-18-2024 - TX)

Indianapolis, Indiana civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in several areas, including employment, transportation, public accommodations, communications and access to state and local government’ programs and servic... More...   $1 (02-26-2024 - IN)

Chicago, Illinois civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discriminatory employment practices on the basis of disability. To establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination against an employer under the ADA requires an employee to show four elements: the em... More...   $0 (02-26-2024 - IL)

Chicago, Illinois civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a job discrimination in employment theory in violation of 21 U.S.C. 2000e.

It is an unlawful employment practice for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, or ... More...   $1 (02-26-2024 - IL)

Chicago, Illinois employment civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination in employment law theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e.... More...   $1 (02-26-2024 - IL)

Muskogee, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a 42 U.S.C. 2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)theory.... More...   $0 (02-26-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on 42 U.S.C. 2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) theories.

It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer—
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges ... More...   $0 (02-23-2024 - OK)

Indianapolis, Indiana civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendant on a Rehabilitation Act violation theory.

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation act of 1973, as amended, (29 U.S.C. 794 - PDF) prohibits discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals on the basis of disability. ... More...   $1 (02-23-2024 - IN)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers presented the Plaintiff who sued on a 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race) theory.

It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer—

(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of s... More...   $1 (02-22-2024 - OK)

McAllen, Texas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on am Americans with Disabilities Act employment discrimination theory.

"The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities and guarantees equal opportunities for individuals with disabilities in employment, transportation, public accommodations, state and local governmen... More...   $1 (02-22-2024 - TX)

McAllen, Texas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a sex discrimination theory.

Section 1981 applies only to intentional racial discrimination, while Title VII applies to intentional discrimination and disparate impact discrimination on race, color, national origin, sex, or religion. Title VII also requires an EEOC charge to be filed before bringing their claims in c... More...   $0 (02-22-2024 - TX)

Corpus Christi, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) theory.

"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
2000e et seq., makes it unlawful for a private employer
or a state or local government “to fail or refuse to hire
or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discrimi-
nate against any... More...   $0 (02-22-2024 - TX)

Anahuac, Texas lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking a declaratory judgment that it could punish a student for refusing to cut his hair.

The Plaintiff claimed that Darryl George’s long hair, which he wears in neatly tied and twisted dreadlocks on top of his head, violates a district dress code that limits hair length for boys. The district has said other stude... More...   $0 (02-22-2024 - TX)

Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Family and Medical Leave Act employment discrimination theory.

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provides certain employees with up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave per year. It also requires that their group health benefits be maintained during the leave.

FMLA is designed to help emplo... More...   $1 (02-19-2024 - OK)

Sacramento, California civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory.

"The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in several areas, including employment, transportation, public accommodations, communications and access to state and local government' programs and service... More...   $1 (02-16-2024 - CA)

St. Louis, Missouri civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an Americans With Disabilities Act violation theory.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in several areas, including employment, transportation, public accommodations, communications and access to state and local government' programs and services. U... More...   $1 (02-16-2024 - MO)

St. Louis, Missouri civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on job discrimination theory.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as amended, protects employees and job applicants from employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. EEOC... More...   $1 (02-16-2024 - MO)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Defendant who sued on a job discrimination theory.

2000e et seq., makes it unlawful for a private employer or a state or local government “to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discrimi- nate against any individual with respect to his compen- sation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, b... More...   $1 (02-16-2024 - OK)

Rutland, Vermont civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination theory.

Plaintiff sued defendants Dartmouth-Hitchcock2Medical Center et al. principally alleging discriminatory3termination of her employment (a) on account of her disability, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq.,the Rehabilitation5Act ... More...   $0 (02-15-2024 - VT)

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination theory.

Employment discrimination laws seek to prevent discrimination based on race, sex, sexual orientation, religion, national origin, physical disability, and age by employers. Discriminatory practices include bias in hiring, promotion, job assignment, termination, compensa... More...   $0 (02-14-2024 - PA)

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.

It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer—
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of suc... More...   $1 (02-14-2024 - PA)

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania civil right lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sue on a job discrmination theory.

42 U.S.C. Section 1981 bars all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in sale or rental or property. Also, the U.S. Supreme Court, in CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries ruled that Section 1981 extends to retaliation claims.... More...   $1 (02-14-2024 - PA)

Little Rock, Arkansas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful job discrimination theory.

42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., makes it unlawful for a private employer or a state or local government “to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discrimi- nate against any individual with respect to his compen- sation, terms, conditions, or pri... More...   $0 (02-12-2024 - AR)

Harrison, Arkansas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on age job discrimination theory.

"The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) protects certain applicants and employees 40 years of age and older from discrimination on the basis of age in hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, or terms, conditions or privileges of employment."

United Sta... More...   $1 (02-12-2024 - AR)

Syracuse, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory by “failing to interview and failing to ultimately hire” the applicant because of her disability.

A seven-person jury in Syracuse, New York returned a verdict this afternoon to resolve a disability discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equ... More...   $1700000 (02-10-2024 - )